DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stanislaw Kardach <kda@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] non-temporal memcpy
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:19:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bac1f67b-e189-fe5c-1dc9-9ec777b692e5@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D871D4@smartserver.smartshare.dk>

Hi Morten,

> This RFC proposes a set of functions optimized for non-temporal memory copy.
> 
> At this stage, I am asking for feedback on the concept.
> 
> Applications sometimes data to another memory location, which is only used
> much later.
> In this case, it is inefficient to pollute the data cache with the copied
> data.
> 
> An example use case (originating from a real life application):
> Copying filtered packets, or the first part of them, into a capture buffer
> for offline analysis.
> 
> The purpose of these functions is to achieve a performance gain by not
> polluting the cache when copying data.
> Although the throughput may be improved by further optimization, I do not
> consider througput optimization relevant initially.
> 
> The x86 non-temporal load instructions have 16 byte alignment
> requirements [1], while ARM non-temporal load instructions are available with
> 4 byte alignment requirements [2].
> Both platforms offer non-temporal store instructions with 4 byte alignment
> requirements.
> 
> In addition to the primary function without any alignment requirements, we
> also provide functions for respectivly 16 and 4 byte aligned access for
> performance purposes.
> 
> The function names resemble standard C library function names, but their
> signatures are intentionally different. No need to drag legacy into it.
> 
> NB: Don't comment on spaces for indentation; a patch will follow DPDK coding
> style and use TAB.


I think there were discussions in other direction - remove rte_memcpy() 
completely and use memcpy() instead...
But if we have a good use case for that, then I am positive in principle.
Though I think we need a clear use-case within dpdk for it
to demonstrate perfomance gain.
Probably copying packets within pdump lib, or examples/dma. or ...
Another thought - do we really need a separate inline function for each 
flavour?
Might be just one non-inline rte_memcpy_nt(dst, src, size, flags),
where flags could be combination of NT_SRC, NT_DST, and keep alignment
detection/decisions to particular implementation?


> [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/intrinsics-guide/index.html#text=_mm_stream_load
> [2] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100076/0100/A64-Instruction-Set-Reference/A64-Floating-point-Instructions/LDNP--SIMD-and-FP-
> 
> V2:
> - Only copy from non-temporal source to non-temporal destination.
>    I.e. remove the two variants with only source and/or destination being
>    non-temporal.
> - Do not require alignment.
>    Instead, offer additional 4 and 16 byte aligned functions for performance
>    purposes.
> - Implemented two of the functions for x86.
> - Remove memset function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> ---
> 
> /**
>   * @warning
>   * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>   *
>   * Copy data from non-temporal source to non-temporal destination.
>   *
>   * @param dst
>   *   Pointer to the non-temporal destination of the data.
>   *   Should be 4 byte aligned, for optimal performance.
>   * @param src
>   *   Pointer to the non-temporal source data.
>   *   No alignment requirements.
>   * @param len
>   *   Number of bytes to copy.
>   *   Should be be divisible by 4, for optimal performance.
>   */
> __rte_experimental
> static __rte_always_inline
> __attribute__((__nonnull__(1, 2), __access__(write_only, 1, 3), __access__(read_only, 2, 3)))
> void rte_memcpy_nt(void * __rte_restrict dst, const void * __rte_restrict src, size_t len)
> /* Implementation T.B.D. */
> 
> /**
>   * @warning
>   * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>   *
>   * Copy data in blocks of 16 byte from aligned non-temporal source
>   * to aligned non-temporal destination.
>   *
>   * @param dst
>   *   Pointer to the non-temporal destination of the data.
>   *   Must be 16 byte aligned.
>   * @param src
>   *   Pointer to the non-temporal source data.
>   *   Must be 16 byte aligned.
>   * @param len
>   *   Number of bytes to copy.
>   *   Must be divisible by 16.
>   */
> __rte_experimental
> static __rte_always_inline
> __attribute__((__nonnull__(1, 2), __access__(write_only, 1, 3), __access__(read_only, 2, 3)))
> void rte_memcpy_nt16a(void * __rte_restrict dst, const void * __rte_restrict src, size_t len)
> {
>      const void * const  end = RTE_PTR_ADD(src, len);
> 
>      RTE_ASSERT(rte_is_aligned(dst, sizeof(__m128i)));
>      RTE_ASSERT(rte_is_aligned(src, sizeof(__m128i)));
>      RTE_ASSERT(rte_is_aligned(len, sizeof(__m128i)));
> 
>      /* Copy large portion of data. */
>      while (RTE_PTR_DIFF(end, src) >= 4 * sizeof(__m128i)) {
>          register __m128i    xmm0, xmm1, xmm2, xmm3;
> 
> /* Note: Workaround for _mm_stream_load_si128() not taking a const pointer as parameter. */
> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
>          xmm0 = _mm_stream_load_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(src, 0 * sizeof(__m128i)));
>          xmm1 = _mm_stream_load_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(src, 1 * sizeof(__m128i)));
>          xmm2 = _mm_stream_load_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(src, 2 * sizeof(__m128i)));
>          xmm3 = _mm_stream_load_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(src, 3 * sizeof(__m128i)));
> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>          _mm_stream_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(__m128i)), xmm0);
>          _mm_stream_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 1 * sizeof(__m128i)), xmm1);
>          _mm_stream_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 2 * sizeof(__m128i)), xmm2);
>          _mm_stream_si128(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 3 * sizeof(__m128i)), xmm3);
>          src = RTE_PTR_ADD(src, 4 * sizeof(__m128i));
>          dst = RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 4 * sizeof(__m128i));
>      }
> 
>      /* Copy remaining data. */
>      while (src != end) {
>          register __m128i    xmm;
> 
> /* Note: Workaround for _mm_stream_load_si128() not taking a const pointer as parameter. */
> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
>          xmm = _mm_stream_load_si128(src);
> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>          _mm_stream_si128(dst, xmm);
>          src = RTE_PTR_ADD(src, sizeof(__m128i));
>          dst = RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, sizeof(__m128i));
>      }
> }
> 
> /**
>   * @warning
>   * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
>   *
>   * Copy data in blocks of 4 byte from aligned non-temporal source
>   * to aligned non-temporal destination.
>   *
>   * @param dst
>   *   Pointer to the non-temporal destination of the data.
>   *   Must be 4 byte aligned.
>   * @param src
>   *   Pointer to the non-temporal source data.
>   *   Must be 4 byte aligned.
>   * @param len
>   *   Number of bytes to copy.
>   *   Must be divisible by 4.
>   */
> __rte_experimental
> static __rte_always_inline
> __attribute__((__nonnull__(1, 2), __access__(write_only, 1, 3), __access__(read_only, 2, 3)))
> void rte_memcpy_nt4a(void * __rte_restrict dst, const void * __rte_restrict src, size_t len)
> {
>      int32_t             buf[sizeof(__m128i) / sizeof(int32_t)] __rte_aligned(sizeof(__m128i));
>      /** Address of source data, rounded down to achieve alignment. */
>      const void *        srca = RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR(src, sizeof(__m128i));
>      /** Address of end of source data, rounded down to achieve alignment. */
>      const void * const  srcenda = RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR(RTE_PTR_ADD(src, len), sizeof(__m128i));
>      const int           offset =  RTE_PTR_DIFF(src, srca) / sizeof(int32_t);
>      register __m128i    xmm0;
> 
>      RTE_ASSERT(rte_is_aligned(dst, sizeof(int32_t)));
>      RTE_ASSERT(rte_is_aligned(src, sizeof(int32_t)));
>      RTE_ASSERT(rte_is_aligned(len, sizeof(int32_t)));
> 
>      if (unlikely(len == 0)) return;
> 
>      /* Copy first, non-__m128i aligned, part of source data. */
>      if (offset) {
> /* Note: Workaround for _mm_stream_load_si128() not taking a const pointer as parameter. */
> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
>          xmm0 = _mm_stream_load_si128(srca);
>          _mm_store_si128((void *)buf, xmm0);
> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>          switch (offset) {
>              case 1:
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[1]);
>                  if (unlikely(len == 1 * sizeof(int32_t))) return;
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 1 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[2]);
>                  if (unlikely(len == 2 * sizeof(int32_t))) return;
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 2 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[3]);
>                  break;
>              case 2:
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[2]);
>                  if (unlikely(len == 1 * sizeof(int32_t))) return;
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 1 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[3]);
>                  break;
>              case 3:
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[3]);
>                  break;
>          }
>          srca = RTE_PTR_ADD(srca, (4 - offset) * sizeof(int32_t));
>          dst = RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, (4 - offset) * sizeof(int32_t));
>      }
> 
>      /* Copy middle, __m128i aligned, part of source data. */
>      while (srca != srcenda) {
> /* Note: Workaround for _mm_stream_load_si128() not taking a const pointer as parameter. */
> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
>          xmm0 = _mm_stream_load_si128(srca);
> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>          _mm_store_si128((void *)buf, xmm0);
>          _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[0]);
>          _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 1 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[1]);
>          _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 2 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[2]);
>          _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 3 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[3]);
>          srca = RTE_PTR_ADD(srca, sizeof(__m128i));
>          dst = RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 4 * sizeof(int32_t));
>      }
> 
>      /* Copy last, non-__m128i aligned, part of source data. */
>      if (RTE_PTR_DIFF(srca, src) != 4) {
> /* Note: Workaround for _mm_stream_load_si128() not taking a const pointer as parameter. */
> #pragma GCC diagnostic push
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
>          xmm0 = _mm_stream_load_si128(srca);
>          _mm_store_si128((void *)buf, xmm0);
> #pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>          switch (offset) {
>              case 1:
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[0]);
>                  break;
>              case 2:
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[0]);
>                  if (unlikely(RTE_PTR_DIFF(srca, src) == 1 * sizeof(int32_t))) return;
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 1 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[1]);
>                  break;
>              case 3:
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 0 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[0]);
>                  if (unlikely(RTE_PTR_DIFF(srca, src) == 1 * sizeof(int32_t))) return;
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 1 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[1]);
>                  if (unlikely(RTE_PTR_DIFF(srca, src) == 2 * sizeof(int32_t))) return;
>                  _mm_stream_si32(RTE_PTR_ADD(dst, 2 * sizeof(int32_t)), buf[2]);
>                  break;
>          }
>      }
> }
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-19 15:26 Morten Brørup
2022-07-19 18:00 ` David Christensen
2022-07-19 18:41   ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-19 18:51     ` Stanisław Kardach
2022-07-19 22:15       ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-21 23:19 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2022-07-22 10:44   ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-24 13:35     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-24 22:18       ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29 10:00         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-29 10:46           ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29 11:50             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-29 17:17               ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29 22:00                 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-30  9:51                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-02  9:05                     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-29 12:13             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-29 16:05               ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-29 17:29                 ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-07 20:40                 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-09  9:24                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-09 11:53                     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-09 16:16                       ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29 18:13               ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29 19:49                 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-07-29 20:26                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29 21:34                     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-07 20:20                     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-09  9:34                       ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-09 11:56                         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-10 21:05                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-08-11 11:50                       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-11 16:26                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-25  1:17       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-27 10:26         ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-27 17:37           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-27 18:49             ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-27 19:12               ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-28  9:00                 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-27 19:52               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-27 22:02                 ` Stanisław Kardach
2022-07-28 10:51                   ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-29  9:21                     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-08-07 20:25 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-09  9:46   ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-09 12:05     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-09 15:00       ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-10 11:47         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-09 15:26     ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-08-09 17:24       ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-10 11:59         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-10 12:12           ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-10 11:55       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-10 12:18         ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-10 21:20           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-08-11 11:53             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-08-11 22:24               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bac1f67b-e189-fe5c-1dc9-9ec777b692e5@yandex.ru \
    --to=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kda@semihalf.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).