DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
To: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	Obrembski MichalX <michalx.obrembski@intel.com>,
	Stokes Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vhost: add support for large buffers
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 19:41:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1c9ccac-88c6-a8c2-7069-5bea2b548c38@ovn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191015161727.32570-1-fbl@sysclose.org>

Hi.
Not a full review.  Few comments inline.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

On 15.10.2019 18:17, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> The rte_vhost_dequeue_burst supports two ways of dequeuing data.
> If the data fits into a buffer, then all data is copied and a
> single linear buffer is returned. Otherwise it allocates
> additional mbufs and chains them together to return a multiple
> segments mbuf.
> 
> While that covers most use cases, it forces applications that
> need to work with larger data sizes to support multiple segments
> mbufs. The non-linear characteristic brings complexity and
> performance implications to the application.
> 
> To resolve the issue, add support to attach external buffer
> to a pktmbuf and let the host provide during registration if
> attaching an external buffer to pktmbuf is supported and if
> only linear buffer are supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
> ---
>   doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst |  35 +++++++++
>   lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h        |   4 +
>   lib/librte_vhost/socket.c           |  22 ++++++
>   lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c            |  22 ++++++
>   lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h            |   4 +
>   lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c       | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   6 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> - Changelog:
>    v4:
>      - allow to use pktmbuf if there is exact space
>      - removed log message if the buffer is too big
>      - fixed the length to include align padding
>      - free allocated buf if shinfo fails
>    v3:
>      - prevent the new features to be used with zero copy
>      - fixed sizeof() usage
>      - fixed log msg indentation
>      - removed/replaced asserts
>      - used the correct virt2iova function
>      - fixed the patch's title
>      - OvS PoC code:
>        https://github.com/fleitner/ovs/tree/rte_malloc-v3
>    v2:
>      - Used rte_malloc() instead of another mempool as suggested by Shahaf.
>      - Added the documentation section.
>      - Using driver registration to negotiate the features.
>      - OvS PoC code:
>        https://github.com/fleitner/ovs/commit/8fc197c40b1d4fda331686a7b919e9e2b670dda7
> 
> 
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst
> index fc3ee4353..07e40e3c5 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst
> @@ -117,6 +117,41 @@ The following is an overview of some key Vhost API functions:
>       Enabling this flag should only be done when the calling application does
>       not pre-fault the guest shared memory, otherwise migration would fail.
>   
> +  - ``RTE_VHOST_USER_LINEARBUF_SUPPORT``
> +
> +    Enabling this flag forces vhost dequeue function to only provide linear
> +    pktmbuf (no multi-segmented pktmbuf).
> +
> +    The vhost library by default provides a single pktmbuf for given a
> +    packet, but if for some reason the data doesn't fit into a single
> +    pktmbuf (e.g., TSO is enabled), the library will allocate additional
> +    pktmbufs from the same mempool and chain them together to create a
> +    multi-segmented pktmbuf.
> +
> +    However, the vhost application needs to support multi-segmented format.
> +    If the vhost application does not support that format and requires large
> +    buffers to be dequeue, this flag should be enabled to force only linear
> +    buffers (see RTE_VHOST_USER_EXTBUF_SUPPORT) or drop the packet.
> +
> +    It is disabled by default.
> +
> +  - ``RTE_VHOST_USER_EXTBUF_SUPPORT``
> +
> +    Enabling this flag allows vhost dequeue function to allocate and attach
> +    an external buffer to a pktmbuf if the pkmbuf doesn't provide enough
> +    space to store all data.
> +
> +    This is useful when the vhost application wants to support large packets
> +    but doesn't want to increase the default mempool object size nor to
> +    support multi-segmented mbufs (non-linear). In this case, a fresh buffer
> +    is allocated using rte_malloc() which gets attached to a pktmbuf using
> +    rte_pktmbuf_attach_extbuf().
> +
> +    See RTE_VHOST_USER_LINEARBUF_SUPPORT as well to disable multi-segmented
> +    mbufs for application that doesn't support chained mbufs.
> +
> +    It is disabled by default.
> +
>   * ``rte_vhost_driver_set_features(path, features)``
>   
>     This function sets the feature bits the vhost-user driver supports. The
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> index 19474bca0..b821b5df4 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ extern "C" {
>   #define RTE_VHOST_USER_DEQUEUE_ZERO_COPY	(1ULL << 2)
>   #define RTE_VHOST_USER_IOMMU_SUPPORT	(1ULL << 3)
>   #define RTE_VHOST_USER_POSTCOPY_SUPPORT		(1ULL << 4)
> +/* support mbuf with external buffer attached */
> +#define RTE_VHOST_USER_EXTBUF_SUPPORT	(1ULL << 5)
> +/* support only linear buffers (no chained mbufs) */
> +#define RTE_VHOST_USER_LINEARBUF_SUPPORT	(1ULL << 6)
>   
>   /** Protocol features. */
>   #ifndef VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_MQ
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c b/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c
> index 274988c4d..e546be2a8 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct vhost_user_socket {
>   	bool dequeue_zero_copy;
>   	bool iommu_support;
>   	bool use_builtin_virtio_net;
> +	bool extbuf;
> +	bool linearbuf;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * The "supported_features" indicates the feature bits the
> @@ -232,6 +234,12 @@ vhost_user_add_connection(int fd, struct vhost_user_socket *vsocket)
>   	if (vsocket->dequeue_zero_copy)
>   		vhost_enable_dequeue_zero_copy(vid);
>   
> +	if (vsocket->extbuf)
> +		vhost_enable_extbuf(vid);
> +
> +	if (vsocket->linearbuf)
> +		vhost_enable_linearbuf(vid);
> +
>   	RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "new device, handle is %d\n", vid);
>   
>   	if (vsocket->notify_ops->new_connection) {
> @@ -870,6 +878,8 @@ rte_vhost_driver_register(const char *path, uint64_t flags)
>   		goto out_free;
>   	}
>   	vsocket->dequeue_zero_copy = flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_DEQUEUE_ZERO_COPY;
> +	vsocket->extbuf = flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_EXTBUF_SUPPORT;
> +	vsocket->linearbuf = flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_LINEARBUF_SUPPORT;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Set the supported features correctly for the builtin vhost-user
> @@ -894,6 +904,18 @@ rte_vhost_driver_register(const char *path, uint64_t flags)
>   	 * not compatible with postcopy.
>   	 */
>   	if (vsocket->dequeue_zero_copy) {
> +		if (vsocket->extbuf) {
> +			RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
> +			"error: zero copy is incompatible with external buffers\n");
> +			ret = -1;
> +			goto out_free;

There should be 'out_mutex'.

> +		}
> +		if (vsocket->linearbuf) {
> +			RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
> +			"error: zero copy is incompatible with linear buffers\n");
> +			ret = -1;
> +			goto out_free;

Ditto.

> +		}
>   		vsocket->supported_features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER);
>   		vsocket->features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER);
>   
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> index cea44df8c..77457f538 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -605,6 +605,28 @@ vhost_set_builtin_virtio_net(int vid, bool enable)
>   		dev->flags &= ~VIRTIO_DEV_BUILTIN_VIRTIO_NET;
>   }
>   
> +void
> +vhost_enable_extbuf(int vid)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
> +
> +	if (dev == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	dev->extbuf = 1;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +vhost_enable_linearbuf(int vid)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_net *dev = get_device(vid);
> +
> +	if (dev == NULL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	dev->linearbuf = 1;
> +}
> +
>   int
>   rte_vhost_get_mtu(int vid, uint16_t *mtu)
>   {
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> index 5131a97a3..0346bd118 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -302,6 +302,8 @@ struct virtio_net {
>   	rte_atomic16_t		broadcast_rarp;
>   	uint32_t		nr_vring;
>   	int			dequeue_zero_copy;
> +	int			extbuf;
> +	int			linearbuf;
>   	struct vhost_virtqueue	*virtqueue[VHOST_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS * 2];
>   #define IF_NAME_SZ (PATH_MAX > IFNAMSIZ ? PATH_MAX : IFNAMSIZ)
>   	char			ifname[IF_NAME_SZ];
> @@ -476,6 +478,8 @@ void vhost_attach_vdpa_device(int vid, int did);
>   void vhost_set_ifname(int, const char *if_name, unsigned int if_len);
>   void vhost_enable_dequeue_zero_copy(int vid);
>   void vhost_set_builtin_virtio_net(int vid, bool enable);
> +void vhost_enable_extbuf(int vid);
> +void vhost_enable_linearbuf(int vid);
>   
>   struct vhost_device_ops const *vhost_driver_callback_get(const char *path);
>   
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> index 5b85b832d..da69ab1db 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1289,6 +1289,93 @@ get_zmbuf(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>   	return NULL;
>   }
>   
> +static void
> +virtio_dev_extbuf_free(void *addr __rte_unused, void *opaque)
> +{
> +	rte_free(opaque);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +virtio_dev_extbuf_alloc(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, uint32_t size)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info *shinfo = NULL;
> +	uint32_t total_len = RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + size;
> +	uint16_t buf_len;
> +	rte_iova_t iova;
> +	void *buf;
> +
> +	/* Try to use pkt buffer to store shinfo to reduce the amount of memory
> +	 * required, otherwise store shinfo in the new buffer.
> +	 */
> +	if (rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(pkt) >= sizeof(*shinfo))
> +		shinfo = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt,
> +					  struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info *);
> +	else {
> +		total_len += sizeof(*shinfo) + sizeof(uintptr_t);
> +		total_len = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(total_len, sizeof(uintptr_t));
> +	}
> +
> +	if (unlikely(total_len > UINT16_MAX))
> +		return -ENOSPC;
> +
> +	buf_len = total_len;
> +	buf = rte_malloc(NULL, buf_len, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> +	if (unlikely(buf == NULL))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Initialize shinfo */
> +	if (shinfo) {
> +		shinfo->free_cb = virtio_dev_extbuf_free;
> +		shinfo->fcb_opaque = buf;
> +		rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_set(shinfo, 1);
> +	} else {
> +		shinfo = rte_pktmbuf_ext_shinfo_init_helper(buf, &buf_len,
> +					      virtio_dev_extbuf_free, buf);
> +		if (unlikely(shinfo == NULL)) {
> +			rte_free(buf);
> +			RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_DATA, "Failed to init shinfo\n");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	iova = rte_malloc_virt2iova(buf);
> +	rte_pktmbuf_attach_extbuf(pkt, buf, iova, buf_len, shinfo);
> +	rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(pkt);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Allocate a host supported pktmbuf.
> + */
> +static __rte_always_inline struct rte_mbuf *
> +virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct rte_mempool *mp,
> +			 uint32_t data_len)
> +{
> +	struct rte_mbuf *pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(pkt == NULL))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(pkt) >= data_len)
> +		return pkt;
> +
> +	/* attach an external buffer if supported */
> +	if (dev->extbuf && !virtio_dev_extbuf_alloc(pkt, data_len))
> +		return pkt;
> +
> +	/* check if chained buffers are allowed */
> +	if (!dev->linearbuf)
> +		return pkt;

I guess, checking of the 'linearbuf' should go before checking the 'extbuf'.
The usecase is that allocation of several buffers from the memory pool is,
probably, faster than rte_malloc() + memory attaching.  So, if the 'linearbuf'
is not requested, it might be faster to use chained mbufs.

BTW, I'm not sure if we really need 2 separate options for this.
i.e. 1. +linear +extbuf --> extbuf allocated
      2. +linear -extbuf --> buffer dropped (is this case is useful at all?)
      3. -linear +extbuf --> chained mbufs might be preferred (see above)
      4. -linear -extbuf --> chained mbufs

Case 4 is a default case. Case 1 is our target case for supporting large buffers.
Case 3 might makes no much sense as the result is equal to case 4.
Case 2 might be not interesting for as at all, because it will lead to random
packet drops depending on their size.

But, if only cases 1 and 4 are valid and interesting to us, we could easily merge
both flags.

Thoughts?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-16 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-01 22:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: add support to large linear mbufs Flavio Leitner
2019-10-01 23:10 ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-02  4:45 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-02  8:04   ` David Marchand
2019-10-02  9:00     ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-02 12:58       ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-02 17:50         ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-02 18:15           ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-03 16:57             ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-03 21:25               ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-02  7:51 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-04 20:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add support for large buffers Flavio Leitner
2019-10-06  4:47   ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-10  5:12   ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-10 12:12     ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-11 17:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Flavio Leitner
2019-10-14  2:44     ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-15 16:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Flavio Leitner
2019-10-15 17:41       ` Ilya Maximets [this message]
2019-10-15 18:44         ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-15 18:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Flavio Leitner
2019-10-16 10:02         ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-16 11:13         ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-16 13:32           ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-16 13:46             ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-16 14:02               ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-16 14:08                 ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-16 14:14                   ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-16 14:05               ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-29  9:02         ` David Marchand
2019-10-29 12:21           ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-29 16:19             ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d1c9ccac-88c6-a8c2-7069-5bea2b548c38@ovn.org \
    --to=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fbl@sysclose.org \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=michalx.obrembski@intel.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).