* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix invalid packet length
[not found] <20190527184448.21264-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
@ 2019-05-27 18:44 ` Konstantin Ananyev
[not found] ` <20190606115151.27805-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2019-05-27 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: akhil.goyal, Konstantin Ananyev, stable
for packets smaller then 64B some NICs reports pkt_len=64B.
As ipsec-secgw (and librte_ipsec) relies on pkt_len value to determine
payload length, that causes problems for small packets.
To fix the issue, check that pkt_len matches values in IPv4/IPv6 header
and re-adjust pkt_len if necessary.
Fixes: 906257e965b7 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support IPv6")
Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample application")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
index 478dd80c2..1d1855f50 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
@@ -229,35 +229,68 @@ static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
static struct socket_ctx socket_ctx[NB_SOCKETS];
+static inline void
+adjust_ipv4_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct ipv4_hdr *iph,
+ uint32_t l2_len)
+{
+ uint32_t plen, trim;
+
+ plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->total_length) + l2_len;
+ if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
+ trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
+ rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void
+adjust_ipv6_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct ipv6_hdr *iph,
+ uint32_t l2_len)
+{
+ uint32_t plen, trim;
+
+ plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->payload_len) + sizeof(*iph) + l2_len;
+ if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
+ trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
+ rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
+ }
+}
+
static inline void
prepare_one_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct ipsec_traffic *t)
{
- uint8_t *nlp;
- struct ether_hdr *eth;
+ const struct ether_hdr *eth;
+ const struct ipv4_hdr *iph4;
+ const struct ipv6_hdr *iph6;
- eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, struct ether_hdr *);
+ eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, const struct ether_hdr *);
if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_IPv4)) {
- nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, ETHER_HDR_LEN);
- nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip, ip_p));
- if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
+
+ iph4 = (const struct ipv4_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
+ ETHER_HDR_LEN);
+ adjust_ipv4_pktlen(pkt, iph4, 0);
+
+ if (iph4->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_ESP)
t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
else {
- t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = nlp;
+ t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = &iph4->next_proto_id;
t->ip4.pkts[(t->ip4.num)++] = pkt;
}
pkt->l2_len = 0;
- pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip);
+ pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph4);
} else if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_IPv6)) {
- nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, ETHER_HDR_LEN);
- nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_nxt));
- if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
+
+ iph6 = (const struct ipv6_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
+ ETHER_HDR_LEN);
+ adjust_ipv6_pktlen(pkt, iph6, 0);
+
+ if (iph6->proto == IPPROTO_ESP)
t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
else {
- t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = nlp;
+ t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = &iph6->proto;
t->ip6.pkts[(t->ip6.num)++] = pkt;
}
pkt->l2_len = 0;
- pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip6_hdr);
+ pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph6);
} else {
/* Unknown/Unsupported type, drop the packet */
RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC, "Unsupported packet type 0x%x\n",
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix invalid packet length
[not found] ` <20190606115151.27805-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
@ 2019-06-06 11:51 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2019-06-25 13:04 ` Akhil Goyal
[not found] ` <20190625231649.22560-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2019-06-06 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: akhil.goyal, Konstantin Ananyev, stable
for packets smaller then 64B some NICs reports pkt_len=64B.
As ipsec-secgw (and librte_ipsec) relies on pkt_len value to determine
payload length, that causes problems for small packets.
To fix the issue, check that pkt_len matches values in IPv4/IPv6 header
and re-adjust pkt_len if necessary.
Fixes: 906257e965b7 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support IPv6")
Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample application")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
index 6c626fa5f..4004f2bc2 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
@@ -229,35 +229,68 @@ static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
static struct socket_ctx socket_ctx[NB_SOCKETS];
+static inline void
+adjust_ipv4_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph,
+ uint32_t l2_len)
+{
+ uint32_t plen, trim;
+
+ plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->total_length) + l2_len;
+ if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
+ trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
+ rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void
+adjust_ipv6_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *iph,
+ uint32_t l2_len)
+{
+ uint32_t plen, trim;
+
+ plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->payload_len) + sizeof(*iph) + l2_len;
+ if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
+ trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
+ rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
+ }
+}
+
static inline void
prepare_one_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct ipsec_traffic *t)
{
- uint8_t *nlp;
- struct rte_ether_hdr *eth;
+ const struct rte_ether_hdr *eth;
+ const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph4;
+ const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *iph6;
- eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, struct rte_ether_hdr *);
+ eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, const struct rte_ether_hdr *);
if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4)) {
- nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
- nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip, ip_p));
- if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
+
+ iph4 = (const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
+ RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
+ adjust_ipv4_pktlen(pkt, iph4, 0);
+
+ if (iph4->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_ESP)
t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
else {
- t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = nlp;
+ t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = &iph4->next_proto_id;
t->ip4.pkts[(t->ip4.num)++] = pkt;
}
pkt->l2_len = 0;
- pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip);
+ pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph4);
} else if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6)) {
- nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
- nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_nxt));
- if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
+
+ iph6 = (const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
+ RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
+ adjust_ipv6_pktlen(pkt, iph6, 0);
+
+ if (iph6->proto == IPPROTO_ESP)
t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
else {
- t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = nlp;
+ t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = &iph6->proto;
t->ip6.pkts[(t->ip6.num)++] = pkt;
}
pkt->l2_len = 0;
- pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip6_hdr);
+ pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph6);
} else {
/* Unknown/Unsupported type, drop the packet */
RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC, "Unsupported packet type 0x%x\n",
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix invalid packet length
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/5] " Konstantin Ananyev
@ 2019-06-25 13:04 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-06-25 13:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2019-06-25 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Ananyev, dev; +Cc: stable
Hi Konstantin,
Could you please rebase this patchset. There are some conflicting changes because of Marcin's patches.
Also could you please squash your doc patch with " examples/ipsec-secgw: support packet fragmentation and reassembly "
As per convention followed, there should not be separate doc patches.
Thanks,
Akhil
>
> for packets smaller then 64B some NICs reports pkt_len=64B.
> As ipsec-secgw (and librte_ipsec) relies on pkt_len value to determine
> payload length, that causes problems for small packets.
> To fix the issue, check that pkt_len matches values in IPv4/IPv6 header
> and re-adjust pkt_len if necessary.
>
> Fixes: 906257e965b7 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support IPv6")
> Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample application")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-
> secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> index 6c626fa5f..4004f2bc2 100644
> --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
> @@ -229,35 +229,68 @@ static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
>
> static struct socket_ctx socket_ctx[NB_SOCKETS];
>
> +static inline void
> +adjust_ipv4_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph,
> + uint32_t l2_len)
> +{
> + uint32_t plen, trim;
> +
> + plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->total_length) + l2_len;
> + if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
> + trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
> + rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +adjust_ipv6_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *iph,
> + uint32_t l2_len)
> +{
> + uint32_t plen, trim;
> +
> + plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->payload_len) + sizeof(*iph) + l2_len;
> + if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
> + trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
> + rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> prepare_one_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct ipsec_traffic *t)
> {
> - uint8_t *nlp;
> - struct rte_ether_hdr *eth;
> + const struct rte_ether_hdr *eth;
> + const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph4;
> + const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *iph6;
>
> - eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, struct rte_ether_hdr *);
> + eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, const struct rte_ether_hdr *);
> if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4)) {
> - nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
> - nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip, ip_p));
> - if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
> +
> + iph4 = (const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
> + RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
> + adjust_ipv4_pktlen(pkt, iph4, 0);
> +
> + if (iph4->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_ESP)
> t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
> else {
> - t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = nlp;
> + t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = &iph4->next_proto_id;
> t->ip4.pkts[(t->ip4.num)++] = pkt;
> }
> pkt->l2_len = 0;
> - pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip);
> + pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph4);
> } else if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6))
> {
> - nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
> - nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_nxt));
> - if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
> +
> + iph6 = (const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
> + RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
> + adjust_ipv6_pktlen(pkt, iph6, 0);
> +
> + if (iph6->proto == IPPROTO_ESP)
> t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
> else {
> - t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = nlp;
> + t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = &iph6->proto;
> t->ip6.pkts[(t->ip6.num)++] = pkt;
> }
> pkt->l2_len = 0;
> - pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip6_hdr);
> + pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph6);
> } else {
> /* Unknown/Unsupported type, drop the packet */
> RTE_LOG(ERR, IPSEC, "Unsupported packet type 0x%x\n",
> --
> 2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/5] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix invalid packet length
2019-06-25 13:04 ` Akhil Goyal
@ 2019-06-25 13:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2019-06-25 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Akhil Goyal, dev; +Cc: stable
Hi Akhil,
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Could you please rebase this patchset. There are some conflicting changes because of Marcin's patches.
> Also could you please squash your doc patch with " examples/ipsec-secgw: support packet fragmentation and reassembly "
> As per convention followed, there should not be separate doc patches.
Sure, will do.
Konstantin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/4] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix invalid packet length
[not found] ` <20190625231649.22560-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
@ 2019-06-25 23:16 ` Konstantin Ananyev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2019-06-25 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: akhil.goyal, Konstantin Ananyev, stable
for packets smaller then 64B some NICs reports pkt_len=64B.
As ipsec-secgw (and librte_ipsec) relies on pkt_len value to determine
payload length, that causes problems for small packets.
To fix the issue, check that pkt_len matches values in IPv4/IPv6 header
and re-adjust pkt_len if necessary.
Fixes: 906257e965b7 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support IPv6")
Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample application")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
index 3911e6a60..33c438964 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c
@@ -230,34 +230,65 @@ static struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
static struct socket_ctx socket_ctx[NB_SOCKETS];
+static inline void
+adjust_ipv4_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph,
+ uint32_t l2_len)
+{
+ uint32_t plen, trim;
+
+ plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->total_length) + l2_len;
+ if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
+ trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
+ rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline void
+adjust_ipv6_pktlen(struct rte_mbuf *m, const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *iph,
+ uint32_t l2_len)
+{
+ uint32_t plen, trim;
+
+ plen = rte_be_to_cpu_16(iph->payload_len) + sizeof(*iph) + l2_len;
+ if (plen < m->pkt_len) {
+ trim = m->pkt_len - plen;
+ rte_pktmbuf_trim(m, trim);
+ }
+}
+
static inline void
prepare_one_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct ipsec_traffic *t)
{
- uint8_t *nlp;
- struct rte_ether_hdr *eth;
+ const struct rte_ether_hdr *eth;
+ const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *iph4;
+ const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *iph6;
- eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, struct rte_ether_hdr *);
+ eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkt, const struct rte_ether_hdr *);
if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4)) {
- nlp = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt, RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
- nlp = RTE_PTR_ADD(nlp, offsetof(struct ip, ip_p));
- if (*nlp == IPPROTO_ESP)
+
+ iph4 = (const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
+ RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
+ adjust_ipv4_pktlen(pkt, iph4, 0);
+
+ if (iph4->next_proto_id == IPPROTO_ESP)
t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
else {
- t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = nlp;
+ t->ip4.data[t->ip4.num] = &iph4->next_proto_id;
t->ip4.pkts[(t->ip4.num)++] = pkt;
}
pkt->l2_len = 0;
- pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ip);
+ pkt->l3_len = sizeof(*iph4);
} else if (eth->ether_type == rte_cpu_to_be_16(RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6)) {
int next_proto;
size_t l3len, ext_len;
- struct rte_ipv6_hdr *v6h;
uint8_t *p;
/* get protocol type */
- v6h = (struct rte_ipv6_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
+ iph6 = (const struct rte_ipv6_hdr *)rte_pktmbuf_adj(pkt,
RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN);
- next_proto = v6h->proto;
+ adjust_ipv6_pktlen(pkt, iph6, 0);
+
+ next_proto = iph6->proto;
/* determine l3 header size up to ESP extension */
l3len = sizeof(struct ip6_hdr);
@@ -276,9 +307,7 @@ prepare_one_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt, struct ipsec_traffic *t)
if (next_proto == IPPROTO_ESP)
t->ipsec.pkts[(t->ipsec.num)++] = pkt;
else {
- t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkt,
- uint8_t *,
- offsetof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr, proto));
+ t->ip6.data[t->ip6.num] = &iph6->proto;
t->ip6.pkts[(t->ip6.num)++] = pkt;
}
pkt->l2_len = 0;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-25 23:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190527184448.21264-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
2019-05-27 18:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix invalid packet length Konstantin Ananyev
[not found] ` <20190606115151.27805-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
2019-06-06 11:51 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/5] " Konstantin Ananyev
2019-06-25 13:04 ` Akhil Goyal
2019-06-25 13:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
[not found] ` <20190625231649.22560-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
2019-06-25 23:16 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/4] " Konstantin Ananyev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).