patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
Cc: "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
	 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	 Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable]  [dpdk-dev] 回复: [PATCH v2 1/1] app/test: collect perf data after worker threads exit
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 18:24:22 +0530
Message-ID: <CALBAE1NCjjr0zf4zEj-vECxxztCPaeRGfZrsg6MRqUOZc3C80g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBBPR08MB44118F42BD6C083B211CB4EAC8929@DBBPR08MB4411.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:36 PM Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Jerin
>
> Sorry to disturb you. Would you please help review this patch when you are free?

Sure. See below.

> Thanks very much.
>
> Best Regards
> Feifei
>
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > 发送时间: 2021年2月25日 17:32
> > 收件人: jerinj@marvell.com; Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>; David
> > Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Feifei Wang
> > <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> > 主题: [PATCH v2 1/1] app/test: collect perf data after worker threads exit
> >
> > The measure_perf function should be executed after worker threads exit to
> > collect correct perf data. Otherwise, while workers are running, the main
> > thread may get incomplete data from workers.
> >
> > In the meanwhile, remove unnecessary barrier in the test.
> > For signal variables "ldata.done" and "ldata.start", no operations should keep
> > the order that being executed after them. So the wmb after them can be
> > moved.
> >
> > Fixes: 16a277a24c9f ("test/trace: add performance test cases")
> > Cc: jerinj@marvell.com
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>


Please change to test/trace: ....
The rest looks good to me.

Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>



> > ---
> >  app/test/test_trace_perf.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_trace_perf.c b/app/test/test_trace_perf.c index
> > e1ad8e6f5..46ae7d807 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_trace_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_trace_perf.c
> > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ signal_workers_to_finish(struct test_data *data)
> >
> >       for (workers = 0; workers < data->nb_workers; workers++) {
> >               data->ldata[workers].done = 1;
> > -             rte_smp_wmb();
> >       }
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ worker_fn_##func(void *arg) \  { \
> >       struct lcore_data *ldata = arg; \
> >       ldata->started = 1; \
> > -     rte_smp_wmb(); \
> >       __worker_##func(ldata); \
> >       return 0; \
> >  }
> > @@ -137,11 +135,12 @@ run_test(const char *str, lcore_function_t f, struct
> > test_data *data, size_t sz)
> >
> >       wait_till_workers_are_ready(data);
> >       rte_delay_ms(100); /* Wait for some time to accumulate the stats */
> > -     measure_perf(str, data);
> >       signal_workers_to_finish(data);
> >
> >       RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(id)
> >               rte_eal_wait_lcore(id);
> > +
> > +     measure_perf(str, data);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210225093213.2811627-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>
2021-02-25  9:32 ` [dpdk-stable] " Feifei Wang
2021-03-09  9:06   ` [dpdk-stable] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-03-09 12:54     ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-03-09 10:27   ` [dpdk-stable] [EXT] [dpdk-dev] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALBAE1NCjjr0zf4zEj-vECxxztCPaeRGfZrsg6MRqUOZc3C80g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

patches for DPDK stable branches

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \
		stable@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index stable

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git