From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: add header check in dequeue offload
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:38:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB449184C89B13FDB1921B7E9C9A909@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311063827.55394-1-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
>
> When parsing the virtio net header and packet header for dequeue offload,
> we need to perform sanity check on the packet header to ensure:
> - No out-of-boundary memory access.
> - The packet header and virtio_net header are valid and aligned.
>
> Fixes: d0cf91303d73 ("vhost: add Tx offload capabilities")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> index 583bf379c6..0fba0053a3 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1821,44 +1821,64 @@ virtio_net_with_host_offload(struct virtio_net *dev)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void
> -parse_ethernet(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t *l4_proto, void **l4_hdr)
> +static int
> +parse_ethernet(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t *l4_proto, void **l4_hdr,
> + uint16_t *len)
> {
> struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
> struct rte_ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr;
> void *l3_hdr = NULL;
> struct rte_ether_hdr *eth_hdr;
> uint16_t ethertype;
> + uint16_t data_len = m->data_len;
>
> eth_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, struct rte_ether_hdr *);
>
> + if (data_len <= sizeof(struct rte_ether_hdr))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> m->l2_len = sizeof(struct rte_ether_hdr);
> ethertype = rte_be_to_cpu_16(eth_hdr->ether_type);
> + data_len -= sizeof(struct rte_ether_hdr);
>
> if (ethertype == RTE_ETHER_TYPE_VLAN) {
> + if (data_len <= sizeof(struct rte_vlan_hdr))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> struct rte_vlan_hdr *vlan_hdr =
> (struct rte_vlan_hdr *)(eth_hdr + 1);
>
> m->l2_len += sizeof(struct rte_vlan_hdr);
> ethertype = rte_be_to_cpu_16(vlan_hdr->eth_proto);
> + data_len -= sizeof(struct rte_vlan_hdr);
> }
>
> l3_hdr = (char *)eth_hdr + m->l2_len;
>
> switch (ethertype) {
> case RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4:
> + if (data_len <= sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr))
> + return -EINVAL;
> ipv4_hdr = l3_hdr;
> *l4_proto = ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id;
> m->l3_len = rte_ipv4_hdr_len(ipv4_hdr);
> + if (data_len <= m->l3_len) {
> + m->l3_len = 0;
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> *l4_hdr = (char *)l3_hdr + m->l3_len;
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV4;
> + data_len -= m->l3_len;
> break;
> case RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6:
> + if (data_len <= sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr))
> + return -EINVAL;
> ipv6_hdr = l3_hdr;
> *l4_proto = ipv6_hdr->proto;
> m->l3_len = sizeof(struct rte_ipv6_hdr);
> *l4_hdr = (char *)l3_hdr + m->l3_len;
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV6;
> + data_len -= m->l3_len;
> break;
> default:
> m->l3_len = 0;
> @@ -1866,6 +1886,9 @@ parse_ethernet(struct rte_mbuf *m, uint16_t *l4_proto, void **l4_hdr)
> *l4_hdr = NULL;
> break;
> }
> +
> + *len = data_len;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static __rte_always_inline void
> @@ -1874,24 +1897,30 @@ vhost_dequeue_offload(struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> uint16_t l4_proto = 0;
> void *l4_hdr = NULL;
> struct rte_tcp_hdr *tcp_hdr = NULL;
> + uint16_t len = 0;
>
> if (hdr->flags == 0 && hdr->gso_type == VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE)
> return;
>
> - parse_ethernet(m, &l4_proto, &l4_hdr);
> + if (parse_ethernet(m, &l4_proto, &l4_hdr, &len) < 0)
> + return;
> +
> if (hdr->flags == VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) {
> if (hdr->csum_start == (m->l2_len + m->l3_len)) {
> switch (hdr->csum_offset) {
> case (offsetof(struct rte_tcp_hdr, cksum)):
> - if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_TCP)
> + if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> + len > sizeof(struct rte_tcp_hdr))
Shouldn't it be '>=' here?
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM;
> break;
> case (offsetof(struct rte_udp_hdr, dgram_cksum)):
> - if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_UDP)
> + if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_UDP &&
> + len > sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr))
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM;
> break;
> case (offsetof(struct rte_sctp_hdr, cksum)):
> - if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_SCTP)
> + if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_SCTP &&
> + len > sizeof(struct rte_sctp_hdr))
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_SCTP_CKSUM;
> break;
> default:
> @@ -1904,12 +1933,20 @@ vhost_dequeue_offload(struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr, struct rte_mbuf *m)
> switch (hdr->gso_type & ~VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN) {
> case VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV4:
> case VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_TCPV6:
> + if (l4_proto != IPPROTO_TCP ||
> + len <= sizeof(struct rte_tcp_hdr))
> + break;
> tcp_hdr = l4_hdr;
> + if (len <= (tcp_hdr->data_off & 0xf0) >> 2)
> + break;
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_TCP_SEG;
> m->tso_segsz = hdr->gso_size;
> m->l4_len = (tcp_hdr->data_off & 0xf0) >> 2;
> break;
> case VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP:
> + if (l4_proto != IPPROTO_UDP ||
> + len <= sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr))
> + break;
> m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_SEG;
> m->tso_segsz = hdr->gso_size;
> m->l4_len = sizeof(struct rte_udp_hdr);
> --
> 2.15.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 6:38 [dpdk-stable] " Xiao Wang
2021-03-11 10:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2021-03-12 15:19 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Wang, Xiao W
2021-03-15 15:32 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Xiao Wang
2021-03-15 16:17 ` David Marchand
2021-03-15 18:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-16 9:13 ` Wang, Xiao W
2021-03-17 6:31 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Xiao Wang
2021-04-01 12:04 ` David Marchand
2021-04-02 8:38 ` Wang, Xiao W
2021-04-12 9:08 ` Wang, Xiao W
2021-04-12 9:33 ` David Marchand
2021-04-13 14:30 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-05-08 5:54 ` Wang, Xiao W
2021-06-15 6:35 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] vhost: check header for legacy " Xiao Wang
2021-06-15 7:57 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2021-06-16 14:33 ` Wang, Xiao W
2021-06-21 8:21 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5] " Xiao Wang
2021-07-13 9:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-07-20 2:43 ` Xia, Chenbo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB449184C89B13FDB1921B7E9C9A909@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).