DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alireza Sanaee <sarsanaee@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: Filip Janiszewski <contact@filipjaniszewski.com>,
	"users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Performance of rte_eth_stats_get
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:25:41 +0100
Message-ID: <596823fd-17b8-eb64-cafc-58bf9065115b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210519090650.5023ce00@hermes.local>

On 19/05/2021 17:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 15:14:38 +0000
> "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com> wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: users <users-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Filip Janiszewski
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 2:10 PM
>>> To: users@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: [dpdk-users] Performance of rte_eth_stats_get
>>> Hi,
>>> Is it safe to call rte_eth_stats_get while capturing from the port?
>>> I'm mostly concerned about performance, if rte_eth_stats_get will in any
>>> way impact the port performance, in the application I plan to call the
>>> function from a thread that is not directly involved in the capture,
>>> there's another worker responsible for rx bursting, but I wonder if the
>>> NIC might get upset if I call it too frequently (say 10 times per
>>> second) and potentially cause some performance issues.
>>> The question is really Nic agnostic, but if the Nic vendor is actually
>>> relevant then I'm running Intel 700 series nic and Mellanox ConnectX-4/5.
>> To understand what really goes on when getting stats, it might help to list the
>> steps involved in getting statistics from the NIC HW.
>> 1) CPU sends an MMIO read (Memory Mapped I/O, aka, sometimes referred
>> to as a "pci read") to the NIC.
>> 2) The PCI bus has to handle extra TLPs (pci transactions) to satisfy read
>> 3) NIC has to send a reply based on accessing its internal counters
>> 4) CPU gets a result from the PCI read.
>> Notice how elegantly this whole process is abstracted from SW? In code, reading
>> a stat value is just dereferencing a pointer that is mapped to the NIC HW address.
>> In practice from a CPU performance point of view, doing an MMIO-read is one of
>> the slowest things you can do. You say the stats-reads are occurring from a thread
>> that is not handling rx/datapath, so perhaps the CPU cycle cost itself isn't a concern.
>> Do note however, that when reading a full set of extended stats from the NIC, there
>> could be many 10's to 100's of MMIO reads (depending on the statistics requested,
>> and how the PMD itself is implemented to handle stats updates).
>> The PCI bus does become more busy with reads to the NIC HW when doing lots of
>> statistic updates, so there is some more contention/activity to be expected there.
>> The PCM tool can be very useful to see MMIO traffic, you could measure how many
>> extra PCI transactions are occurring due to reading stats every X ms?
>> https://github.com/opcm/pcm
>> I can recommend measuring pkt latency/jitter as a histogram, as then outliers in performance
>> can be identified. If you specifically want to identify if these are due stats reads, compare
>> with a "no stats reads" latency/jitter histogram, and graphically see the impact.
>> In the end if it doesn't affect packet latency/jitter, then it has no impact right?
>> Ultimately, I can't give a generic answer - best steps are to measure carefully and find out!
>>> Thanks
>> Hope the above helps and doesn't add confusion :)  Regards, -Harry
> Many drivers require transactions with the firmware via mailbox.
> And that transaction needs a spin wait for the shared area.

Thank you for explaining the steps quite nicely. I also noticed this 
problem too. Calling `rte_eth_stats_get` in the PMDport per batch almost
halves the throughput in a 10G setup IIRC, the cost is prohibitively 
HIGH. This, however, doesn't show up when DPDK connects a vhost-pmdport, 
since all of port statistics are probably somewhere in the shared

      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 13:10 Filip Janiszewski
2021-05-19 15:14 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2021-05-19 16:06   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-14 10:25     ` Alireza Sanaee [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=596823fd-17b8-eb64-cafc-58bf9065115b@gmail.com \
    --to=sarsanaee@gmail.com \
    --cc=contact@filipjaniszewski.com \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK usage discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/users/0 users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 users users/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/users \
	public-inbox-index users

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git