DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
To: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] net/i40e: enable direct re-arm mode
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 00:46:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211224164613.32569-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211224164613.32569-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>

For i40e driver, enable direct re-arm mode. This patch supports the
case of mapping Rx/Tx queues from the same single lcore.

Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h          |   4 +
 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
index 5e6eecc501..1fdf4305f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ struct i40e_rx_queue {
 
 	uint16_t rxrearm_nb;	/**< number of remaining to be re-armed */
 	uint16_t rxrearm_start;	/**< the idx we start the re-arming from */
+	uint16_t direct_rxrearm_port; /** device TX port ID for direct re-arm mode */
+	uint16_t direct_rxrearm_queue; /** TX queue index for direct re-arm mode */
 	uint64_t mbuf_initializer; /**< value to init mbufs */
 
 	uint16_t port_id; /**< device port ID */
@@ -121,6 +123,8 @@ struct i40e_rx_queue {
 	uint16_t rx_using_sse; /**<flag indicate the usage of vPMD for rx */
 	uint8_t dcb_tc;         /**< Traffic class of rx queue */
 	uint64_t offloads; /**< Rx offload flags of RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_* */
+	/**<  0 if direct re-arm mode disabled, 1 when enabled */
+	bool direct_rxrearm_enable;
 	const struct rte_memzone *mz;
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
index b951ea2dc3..72bac3fb40 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
@@ -77,6 +77,147 @@ i40e_rxq_rearm(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
 	I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
 }
 
+static inline void
+i40e_rxq_rearm_direct_single(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
+{
+	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
+	struct i40e_tx_queue *txq;
+	volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;
+	struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
+	struct i40e_rx_entry *rxep;
+	uint16_t tx_port_id, tx_queue_id;
+	uint16_t rx_id;
+	struct rte_mbuf *mb0, *mb1, *m;
+	uint64x2_t dma_addr0, dma_addr1;
+	uint64x2_t zero = vdupq_n_u64(0);
+	uint64_t paddr;
+	uint16_t i, n;
+	uint16_t nb_rearm = 0;
+
+	rxdp = rxq->rx_ring + rxq->rxrearm_start;
+	rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rxrearm_start];
+
+	tx_port_id = rxq->direct_rxrearm_port;
+	tx_queue_id = rxq->direct_rxrearm_queue;
+	dev = &rte_eth_devices[tx_port_id];
+	txq = dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id];
+
+	/* tx_rs_thresh must be equal to
+	 * RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH in
+	 * direct re-arm mode due to
+	 * tx_next_dd update based on the
+	 * number of free buffers in the
+	 * next time
+	 */
+	n = RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH;
+
+	if (txq->nb_tx_free < txq->tx_free_thresh) {
+		/* check DD bits on threshold descriptor */
+		if ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
+				rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
+				rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE)) {
+			goto mempool_bulk;
+		}
+
+		/* first buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
+		 * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1)
+		 */
+		txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n - 1)];
+
+		if (txq->offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
+			/* directly put mbufs from Tx to Rx,
+			 * and initialize the mbufs in vector,
+			 * process 2 mbufs in one loop
+			 */
+			for (i = 0; i < n; i += 2, rxep += 2, txep += 2) {
+				rxep[0].mbuf = txep[0].mbuf;
+				rxep[1].mbuf = txep[1].mbuf;
+
+				/* Initialize rxdp descs */
+				mb0 = txep[0].mbuf;
+				mb1 = txep[1].mbuf;
+
+				paddr = mb0->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+				dma_addr0 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+				/* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+				vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr0);
+
+				paddr = mb1->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+				dma_addr1 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+				/* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+				vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr1);
+			}
+		} else {
+			for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+				m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
+				if (m != NULL) {
+					rxep[i].mbuf = m;
+
+					/* Initialize rxdp descs */
+					paddr = m->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+					dma_addr0 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+					/* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+					vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr0);
+					nb_rearm++;
+				}
+			}
+			n = nb_rearm;
+		}
+
+		/* update counters for Tx */
+		txq->nb_tx_free = (uint16_t)(txq->nb_tx_free + RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH);
+		txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_dd + RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH);
+		if (txq->tx_next_dd >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
+			txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH - 1);
+	} else {
+mempool_bulk:
+		/* if TX did not free bufs into Rx sw-ring,
+		 * get new bufs from mempool
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(rte_mempool_get_bulk(rxq->mp, (void *)rxep, n) < 0)) {
+			if (rxq->rxrearm_nb + n >= rxq->nb_rx_desc) {
+				for (i = 0; i < RTE_I40E_DESCS_PER_LOOP; i++) {
+					rxep[i].mbuf = &rxq->fake_mbuf;
+					vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp[i].read, zero);
+				}
+			}
+			rte_eth_devices[rxq->port_id].data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed += n;
+			return;
+		}
+
+		/* Initialize the mbufs in vector, process 2 mbufs in one loop */
+		for (i = 0; i < n; i += 2, rxep += 2) {
+			mb0 = rxep[0].mbuf;
+			mb1 = rxep[1].mbuf;
+
+			paddr = mb0->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+			dma_addr0 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+			/* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+			vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr0);
+
+			paddr = mb1->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+			dma_addr1 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+			/* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+			vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr1);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* Update the descriptor initializer index */
+	rxq->rxrearm_start += n;
+	rx_id = rxq->rxrearm_start - 1;
+
+	if (unlikely(rxq->rxrearm_start >= rxq->nb_rx_desc)) {
+		rxq->rxrearm_start = 0;
+		rx_id = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;
+	}
+
+	rxq->rxrearm_nb -= n;
+
+	rte_io_wmb();
+	/* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
+	I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
+}
+
 static inline void
 desc_to_olflags_v(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq, uint64x2_t descs[4],
 		  struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
@@ -244,8 +385,12 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct i40e_rx_queue *__rte_restrict rxq,
 	/* See if we need to rearm the RX queue - gives the prefetch a bit
 	 * of time to act
 	 */
-	if (rxq->rxrearm_nb > RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH)
-		i40e_rxq_rearm(rxq);
+	if (rxq->rxrearm_nb > RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH) {
+		if (rxq->direct_rxrearm_enable)
+			i40e_rxq_rearm_direct_single(rxq);
+		else
+			i40e_rxq_rearm(rxq);
+	}
 
 	/* Before we start moving massive data around, check to see if
 	 * there is actually a packet available
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-24 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-24 16:46 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] ethdev: add API for direct re-arm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 19:38   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-12-26  9:49     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:31       ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] net/i40e: add direct re-arm mode internal API Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] examples/l3fwd: give an example for direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Morten Brørup
2021-12-28  6:55   ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-01-18 15:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 16:53       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-18 17:27         ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-27  5:24           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 16:45             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-02 19:46               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27  5:16         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-28  6:43       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-28  6:52         ` Feifei Wang
2022-01-27  4:06   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 17:13     ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-28 11:29     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 11:41     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-29  2:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  7:19     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30  9:31       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:15         ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30 15:58         ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-26  6:59           ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26  7:29       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26  7:36       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:04   ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-03  2:48     ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:56   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-25  7:57     ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue to Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 15:08     ` Morten Brørup
2023-05-31  6:10       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 12:53     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  2:55       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  7:10         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06  7:31           ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  8:34             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-07  0:00               ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-12  3:25                 ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:02     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  3:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  7:18         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06  7:58           ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  8:27             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-12  3:05               ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:08     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  6:32       ` Feifei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211224164613.32569-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).