DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: "Feifei Wang" <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
	"Константин Ананьев" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	"Yuying Zhang" <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Beilei Xing" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 07:18:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be1562dc9282405dabe695bd06d49519@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR08MB7718CC0E3296731322F0FFF2C852A@AS8PR08MB7718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

> 
> Define specific function implementation for i40e driver.
> Currently, mbufs recycle mode can support 128bit
> vector path and avx2 path. And can be enabled both in
> fast free and no fast free mode.
> 
> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <mailto:feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <mailto:ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 1 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 2 +
>  .../net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 32 ++++
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h | 4 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/meson.build | 2 +
>  6 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index f9d8f9791f..d4eecd16cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops i40e_eth_dev_ops = {
>          .flow_ops_get = i40e_dev_flow_ops_get,
>          .rxq_info_get = i40e_rxq_info_get,
>          .txq_info_get = i40e_txq_info_get,
> + .recycle_rxq_info_get = i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get,
>          .rx_burst_mode_get = i40e_rx_burst_mode_get,
>          .tx_burst_mode_get = i40e_tx_burst_mode_get,
>          .timesync_enable = i40e_timesync_enable,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> index 9b806d130e..b5b2d6cf2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> @@ -1355,6 +1355,8 @@ void i40e_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>          struct rte_eth_rxq_info *qinfo);
>  void i40e_txq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>          struct rte_eth_txq_info *qinfo);
> +void i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> + struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info *recycle_rxq_info);
>  int i40e_rx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>                             struct rte_eth_burst_mode *mode);
>  int i40e_tx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..08d708fd7d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Arm Limited.
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <ethdev_driver.h>
> +
> +#include "base/i40e_prototype.h"
> +#include "base/i40e_type.h"
> +#include "i40e_ethdev.h"
> +#include "i40e_rxtx.h"
> +
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wcast-qual"
> +
> +void
> +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec(void *rx_queue, uint16_t nb_mbufs)
> +{
> + struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
> + struct i40e_rx_entry *rxep;
> + volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;
> + uint16_t rx_id;
> + uint64_t paddr;
> + uint64_t dma_addr;
> + uint16_t i;
> +
> + rxdp = rxq->rx_ring + rxq->rxrearm_start;
> + rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rxrearm_start];
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nb_mbufs; i++) {
> + /* Initialize rxdp descs. */
> + paddr = (rxep[i].mbuf)->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> + dma_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(paddr);
> + /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
> + rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = 0;
> + rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = dma_addr;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update the descriptor initializer index */
> + rxq->rxrearm_start += nb_mbufs;
> + rx_id = rxq->rxrearm_start - 1;
> +
> + if (unlikely(rxq->rxrearm_start >= rxq->nb_rx_desc)) {
> + rxq->rxrearm_start = 0;
> + rx_id = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;
> + }
> +
> + rxq->rxrearm_nb -= nb_mbufs;
> +
> + rte_io_wmb();
> + /* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
> + I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
> +}
> +
> +uint16_t
> +i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec(void *tx_queue,
> + struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info *recycle_rxq_info)
> +{
> + struct i40e_tx_queue *txq = tx_queue;
> + struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
> + struct rte_mbuf **rxep;
> + struct rte_mbuf *m[RTE_I40E_TX_MAX_FREE_BUF_SZ];
> + int i, j, n;
> + uint16_t avail = 0;
> + uint16_t mbuf_ring_size = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size;
> + uint16_t mask = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size - 1;
> + uint16_t refill_requirement = recycle_rxq_info->refill_requirement;
> + uint16_t refill_head = *recycle_rxq_info->refill_head;
> + uint16_t receive_tail = *recycle_rxq_info->receive_tail;
> +
> + /* Get available recycling Rx buffers. */
> + avail = (mbuf_ring_size - (refill_head - receive_tail)) & mask;
> +
> + /* Check Tx free thresh and Rx available space. */
> + if (txq->nb_tx_free > txq->tx_free_thresh || avail <= txq->tx_rs_thresh)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* check DD bits on threshold descriptor */
> + if ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> + rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE))
> + return 0;
> +
> + n = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> +
> + /* Mbufs recycle mode can only support no ring buffer wrapping around.
> + * Two case for this:
> + *
> + * case 1: The refill head of Rx buffer ring needs to be aligned with
> + * mbuf ring size. In this case, the number of Tx freeing buffers
> + * should be equal to refill_requirement.
> + *
> + * case 2: The refill head of Rx ring buffer does not need to be aligned
> + * with mbuf ring size. In this case, the update of refill head can not
> + * exceed the Rx mbuf ring size.
> + */
> + if (refill_requirement != n ||
> + (!refill_requirement && (refill_head + n > mbuf_ring_size)))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* First buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
> + * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1).
> + */
> + txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n - 1)];
> + rxep = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring;
> + rxep += refill_head;
> +
> + if (txq->offloads & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
> + /* Directly put mbufs from Tx to Rx. */
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++, rxep++, txep++)
> + *rxep = txep[0].mbuf;
> + } else {
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < n; i++) {
> + /* Avoid txq contains buffers from expected mempool. */
> + if (unlikely(recycle_rxq_info->mp
> + != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> + return 0;
> I don't think that it is possible to simply return 0 here:
> we might already have some mbufs inside rxep[], so we probably need
> to return that number (j).
> 
> No, here is just pre-free, not actually put mbufs into rxeq.
 
I understand that.
What I am saying: after you call pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf),
you can’t keep it in the txq anymore.
You have either to put it into rxep[], or back into mempool.
Also txq state (nb_tx_free, etc.) need to be updated.

> After run out of the loop, we call rte_memcpy to actually copy
> mbufs into rxep.
> +
> + m[j] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> +
> + /* In case 1, each of Tx buffers should be the
> + * last reference.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(m[j] == NULL && refill_requirement))
> + return 0;
> 
> same here, we can't simply return 0, it will introduce mbuf leakage.
> + /* In case 2, the number of valid Tx free
> + * buffers should be recorded.
> + */
> + j++;
> + }
> + rte_memcpy(rxep, m, sizeof(void *) * j);
> Wonder why do you need intermediate buffer for released mbufs?
> Why can't just:
> ...
> m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> ...
> rxep[j++] = m;
> ?
> Might save you few extra cycles.
> Sometimes ‘rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg’ can return NULL due to
> mbuf->refcnt > 1. So we should firstly ensure all ‘m’ are valid and
> then copy them into rxep.

I understand that, but you can check is it NULL or not.

> + }
> +
> + /* Update counters for Tx. */
> + txq->nb_tx_free = (uint16_t)(txq->nb_tx_free + txq->tx_rs_thresh);
> + txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_dd + txq->tx_rs_thresh);
> + if (txq->tx_next_dd >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
> + txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1);
> +
> + return n;
> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-24 16:46 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] net/i40e: enable direct re-arm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] ethdev: add API for " Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 19:38   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-12-26  9:49     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:31       ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] net/i40e: add direct re-arm mode internal API Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] examples/l3fwd: give an example for direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Morten Brørup
2021-12-28  6:55   ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-01-18 15:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 16:53       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-18 17:27         ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-27  5:24           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 16:45             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-02 19:46               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27  5:16         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-28  6:43       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-28  6:52         ` Feifei Wang
2022-01-27  4:06   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 17:13     ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-28 11:29     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 11:41     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-29  2:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  7:19     ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30  9:31       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:15         ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30 15:58         ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-26  6:59           ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26  7:29       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30  6:29   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26  7:36       ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:04   ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-03  2:48     ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:56   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-25  7:57     ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue to Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 15:08     ` Morten Brørup
2023-05-31  6:10       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 12:53     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  2:55       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  7:10         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06  7:31           ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  8:34             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-07  0:00               ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-12  3:25                 ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:02     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  3:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  7:18         ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2023-06-06  7:58           ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06  8:27             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-12  3:05               ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-05-25  9:45   ` [PATCH v6 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:08     ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06  6:32       ` Feifei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be1562dc9282405dabe695bd06d49519@huawei.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).