DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sexton, Rory" <rory.sexton@intel.com>
To: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	"Jagus, DariuszX" <dariuszx.jagus@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add L2TPv3 header to flow API
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:31:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB36719A3007A83C26E474E949EC5A0@BYAPR11MB3671.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR05MB34258D823BAECCCFC29CED8ADB5A0@AM4PR05MB3425.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Ori,

See comments below.

Regards,
Rory

> > > > > > +/**
> > > > > > + * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_L2TPV3.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Matches a L2TPv3 header.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv3 {
> > > > > > +	rte_be32_t session_id; /**< Session ID. */ };
> > > > >
> > > > >Does it make sense that in future we will want to match on the T / 
> > > > >L / ver /
> > > > Ns / Nr?
> > > > >
> > > > >Please also consider that any change will be ABI / API breakage, 
> > > > >which will
> > > > >be allowed only next year.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't foresee us wanting to match on any of the other fields, T / 
> > > > L / ver / Ns/ Nr.
> > > > The session id would typically be the only field of interest in the
> > > > l2tpv3 header.
> > >
> > > I think that adding all fields to the structure will solve the 
> > > possible issue
> > with adding matching later.
> > > Also and even more important you will be able to use it for creating 
> > > the
> > raw_encap / raw_decap buffers.
> > >
> > >What do you think?
> > 
> > Based on the differences between v2 and v3 the only field of interest 
> > in
> > l2tpv3 over IP is the Session ID.
> > I agree it would make sense to add all fields if we were implementing 
> > l2tpv2 however v2 would require a different implementation to v3 due 
> > to the differences between both Protocols.
>
> Even if we just support v3, I think that it is a good idea to add all fields of v3. 
> This will allow the use of the raw_encap / raw_decap actions.
> Please also note that you didn't add the new item to  cmd_set_raw_parsed function.
> this function is used in order to create raw_encap/ raw_decap encapsulations.

I think the confusion here is based on the fact that there are 2 separate types of l2tpv3.
- l2tpv3 over UDP, which is very similar to l2tpv2 with only change being 16 bit Tunnel ID 
  and 16 bit Session ID changing to 32 bit Session ID. All other fields remain (T/L/Ver/Ns/Nr).
- l2tpv3 over IP is another type of l2tpv3 that is carried over IP rather than UDP and as such
  the message format is entirely different and consists of just a 32 bit Session ID. The other
  fields mentioned above do not exist at all in this l2tpv3 header.

This patch was targeted at creating a flow to handle l2tpv3 over IP exclusively. This is why
the Session ID is the only field in the flow item.

I can add the item to cmd_set_raw_parsed function.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-04 14:10 Rory Sexton
2019-12-04 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: Add new customized pctype for l2tpv3 Rory Sexton
2019-12-11 22:51   ` Xing, Beilei
2019-12-13 11:17     ` Sexton, Rory
2019-12-13 17:33       ` Xing, Beilei
2019-12-16 10:13         ` Sexton, Rory
2019-12-10 10:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add L2TPv3 header to flow API Ori Kam
2019-12-10 14:52   ` Sexton, Rory
2019-12-10 20:32     ` Ori Kam
2019-12-11 11:36       ` Sexton, Rory
2019-12-11 13:30         ` Ori Kam
2019-12-11 16:31           ` Sexton, Rory [this message]
2019-12-12 13:38             ` Sexton, Rory

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB36719A3007A83C26E474E949EC5A0@BYAPR11MB3671.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=rory.sexton@intel.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dariuszx.jagus@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).