From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 10:16:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1114e227-69ba-19b2-16d2-48be5399fb04@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb2bb929-4cdc-c76b-dc2a-3bdddcfbb9b0@yandex.ru>
Hi, Konstantin,
fixed in v4, thanks.
在 2022/5/11 5:48, Konstantin Ananyev 写道:
>
> Hi Ferruh,
>
>> On 5/6/2022 9:16 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>>> Hi, Konstantin,
>>>
>>> 在 2022/5/4 7:39, Konstantin Ananyev 写道:
>>>> 03/05/2022 11:02, Min Hu (Connor) пишет:
>>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Starting or stopping a bonded port also starts or stops all active
>>>>> slaves
>>>>> under the bonded port. If this port is a bonded device, we need to
>>>>> modify
>>>>> the port status of all slaves.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 0e545d3047fe ("app/testpmd: check stopping port is not in
>>>>> bonding")
>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>>>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 74
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 3 +-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> index 6ffea8e21a..d9fc7a88bd 100644
>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>>> @@ -6671,6 +6671,7 @@ static void
>>>>> cmd_create_bonded_device_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>>> "Failed to enable promiscuous mode for port %u:
>>>>> %s - ignore\n",
>>>>> port_id, rte_strerror(-ret));
>>>>> + ports[port_id].bond_flag = 1;
>>>>> ports[port_id].need_setup = 0;
>>>>> ports[port_id].port_status = RTE_PORT_STOPPED;
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>>> index fe2ce19f99..dc90600787 100644
>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
>>>>> #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
>>>>> #include <process.h>
>>>>> #endif
>>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>>> +#include <rte_eth_bond.h>
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> #include "testpmd.h"
>>>>> @@ -597,11 +600,57 @@ eth_dev_configure_mp(uint16_t port_id,
>>>>> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>>> +static int
>>>>> +change_bonding_slave_port_status(portid_t bond_pid, bool is_stop)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + portid_t slave_pids[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
>>>>> + struct rte_port *port;
>>>>> + int num_slaves;
>>>>> + portid_t slave_pid;
>>>>> + int i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + num_slaves = rte_eth_bond_slaves_get(bond_pid, slave_pids,
>>>>> + RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS);
>>>>> + if (num_slaves < 0) {
>>>>> + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get slave list for port = %u\n",
>>>>> + bond_pid);
>>>>> + return num_slaves;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_slaves; i++) {
>>>>> + slave_pid = slave_pids[i];
>>>>> + port = &ports[slave_pid];
>>>>> + port->port_status =
>>>>> + is_stop ? RTE_PORT_STOPPED : RTE_PORT_STARTED;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int
>>>>> eth_dev_start_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - if (is_proc_primary())
>>>>> - return rte_eth_dev_start(port_id);
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (is_proc_primary()) {
>>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_start(port_id);
>>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>>> + struct rte_port *port = &ports[port_id];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Starting a bonded port also starts all slaves under the
>>>>> bonded
>>>>> + * device. So if this port is bond device, we need to
>>>>> modify the
>>>>> + * port status of these slaves.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (port->bond_flag == 1)
>>>>> + return change_bonding_slave_port_status(port_id, false);
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> + }
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -609,8 +658,25 @@ eth_dev_start_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>>> static int
>>>>> eth_dev_stop_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - if (is_proc_primary())
>>>>> - return rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id);
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (is_proc_primary()) {
>>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id);
>>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>>
>>>> Here and in other places - probably no need to pollute the code
>>>> with all these 'ifdef RTE_NET_BOND'.
>>>> I suppose this logic (for checking is bonding API present or not)
>>>> can be hidden inside change_bonding_slave_port_status() itself.
>>>>
>>> I think it does not pollute the code. anyone can tell according to
>>> the flag 'ifdef RTE_NET_BOND'.
>>> if hiddle inside 'change_bonding_slave_port_status', it will be weird.
>>> For example, if the port is not bonding port, It will also invoke
>>> 'change_bonding_slave_port_status'. That is unreasonable.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Konstantin,
>>
>> I also was not happy to have bonding (or any PMD) ifdef in the generic
>> (start()/stop()) functions, but the ifdef blocks updates testpmd
>> (application) level status. So that can't be handled in the PMD and
>> need to be in the application level.
>> Which is enforcing to have same PMD specific code in the testpmd level,
>> if you have any suggestion to prevent this, I am for it.
>
>
> I am not aking to move it to PMD.
> What I am saying that this ifdef logic could be grouped in one place
> (inside change_bonding_slave_port_status()) instead of spreading it
> around multiple places.
>
>>
>> I will proceed with first two patch of this set, which fixes bonding
>> PMD issues, I will hold the testpmd ones for more comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ferruh
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + struct rte_port *port = &ports[port_id];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Stopping a bonded port also stops all slaves under the
>>>>> bonded
>>>>> + * device. So if this port is bond device, we need to
>>>>> modify the
>>>>> + * port status of these slaves.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (port->bond_flag == 1)
>>>>> + return change_bonding_slave_port_status(port_id, true);
>>>>> +#endif
>>>>> + }
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
>>>>> index 31f766c965..67f253b30e 100644
>>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
>>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
>>>>> @@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ struct rte_port {
>>>>> uint32_t mc_addr_nb; /**< nb. of addr. in
>>>>> mc_addr_pool */
>>>>> queueid_t queue_nb; /**< nb. of queues for flow
>>>>> rules */
>>>>> uint32_t queue_sz; /**< size of a queue for
>>>>> flow rules */
>>>>> - uint8_t slave_flag; /**< bonding slave port */
>>>>> + uint8_t slave_flag : 1, /**< bonding slave
>>>>> port */
>>>>> + bond_flag : 1; /**< port is bond device */
>>>>> struct port_template *pattern_templ_list; /**< Pattern
>>>>> templates. */
>>>>> struct port_template *actions_templ_list; /**< Actions
>>>>> templates. */
>>>>> struct port_table *table_list; /**< Flow tables. */
>>>>
>>>> .
>>
>
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211025063922.34066-1-humin29@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20220324030036.4761-1-humin29@huawei.com>
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] net/bonding: fix non-active slaves aren't stopped Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-26 18:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-04-29 6:45 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-29 13:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-03 6:54 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 19:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-05 1:16 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] net/bonding: fix non-terminable while loop Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-26 18:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-04-29 6:52 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-29 13:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device Min Hu (Connor)
2022-03-24 3:00 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] app/testpmd: fix slave device isn't released Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-30 6:01 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-30 10:21 ` Singh, Aman Deep
[not found] ` <20220503100217.46203-1-humin29@huawei.com>
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] net/bonding: fix non-active slaves aren't stopped Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] net/bonding: fix non-terminable while loop Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-03 23:39 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-06 8:16 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-08 11:28 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-10 16:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-10 21:48 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-11 2:16 ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]
2022-05-11 10:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-11 2:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-11 22:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-19 7:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] app/testpmd: fix slave device isn't released Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-01 17:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-06-07 8:15 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-07 8:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Dongdong Liu
2022-06-07 14:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-06-09 7:50 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-09 8:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-06-09 11:20 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-09 11:49 ` [PATCH v5] " Dongdong Liu
2022-06-10 8:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-03 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ethdev: fix dev state when stop Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-25 17:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-26 10:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-30 12:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1114e227-69ba-19b2-16d2-48be5399fb04@huawei.com \
--to=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).