[PATCH v5 01/29] baseband/acc100: fix ring availability calculation

[PATCH v5 01/29] baseband/acc100: fix ring availability calculation

[Hernan Vargas]

Refactor of the queue availability computation to prevent the
application to dequeue more than what may have been enqueued.

Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index e5384223d1..3b0c8e41dc 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -2861,7 +2861,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_enc_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i;
 	union acc_dma_desc *desc;
 	int ret;
@@ -2899,7 +2899,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_enc_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i = 0;
 	union acc_dma_desc *desc;
 	int ret, desc_idx = 0;
@@ -2949,7 +2949,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_enc_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i, enqueued_cbs = 0;
 	uint8_t cbs_in_tb;
 	int ret;
@@ -3011,7 +3011,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_dec_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i;
 	union acc_dma_desc *desc;
 	int ret;
@@ -3050,7 +3050,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i, enqueued_cbs = 0;
 	uint8_t cbs_in_tb;
 	int ret;
@@ -3083,7 +3083,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i;
 	union acc_dma_desc *desc;
 	int ret;
@@ -3132,7 +3132,7 @@ acc100_enqueue_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t avail = q->sw_ring_depth + q->sw_ring_tail - q->sw_ring_head;
+	int32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_enq(q);
 	uint16_t i, enqueued_cbs = 0;
 	uint8_t cbs_in_tb;
 	int ret;
@@ -3495,12 +3495,13 @@ acc100_dequeue_enc(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
 	uint16_t dequeue_num;
-	uint32_t avail = q->sw_ring_head - q->sw_ring_tail;
+	uint32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_deq(q);
 	uint32_t aq_dequeued = 0;
 	uint16_t i, dequeued_cbs = 0;
 	struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op;
 	int ret;
-
+	if (avail == 0)
+		return 0;
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 	if (unlikely(ops == NULL || q == NULL)) {
 		rte_bbdev_log_debug("Unexpected undefined pointer");
@@ -3539,7 +3540,7 @@ acc100_dequeue_ldpc_enc(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	uint32_t avail = q->sw_ring_head - q->sw_ring_tail;
+	uint32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_deq(q);
 	uint32_t aq_dequeued = 0;
 	uint16_t dequeue_num, i, dequeued_cbs = 0, dequeued_descs = 0;
 	int ret;
@@ -3579,7 +3580,7 @@ acc100_dequeue_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
 	uint16_t dequeue_num;
-	uint32_t avail = q->sw_ring_head - q->sw_ring_tail;
+	uint32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_deq(q);
 	uint32_t aq_dequeued = 0;
 	uint16_t i;
 	uint16_t dequeued_cbs = 0;
@@ -3623,7 +3624,7 @@ acc100_dequeue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 {
 	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
 	uint16_t dequeue_num;
-	uint32_t avail = q->sw_ring_head - q->sw_ring_tail;
+	uint32_t avail = acc_ring_avail_deq(q);
 	uint32_t aq_dequeued = 0;
 	uint16_t i;
 	uint16_t dequeued_cbs = 0;
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 02/29] baseband/acc100: add function to check AQ availability

[Hernan Vargas]

It is possible for some corner case to run more batch enqueue than
supported. A protection is required to avoid that corner case.
Enhance all ACC100 enqueue operations with check to see if there is room
in the atomic queue for enqueueing batches into the queue manager
Check room in AQ for the enqueues batches into Qmgr

Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 3b0c8e41dc..7fec2283eb 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -2983,7 +2983,8 @@ static uint16_t
 acc100_enqueue_enc(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
-	if (unlikely(num == 0))
+	int32_t aq_avail = acc_aq_avail(q_data, num);
+	if (unlikely((aq_avail <= 0) || (num == 0)))
 		return 0;
 	if (ops[0]->turbo_enc.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
 		return acc100_enqueue_enc_tb(q_data, ops, num);
@@ -2996,7 +2997,8 @@ static uint16_t
 acc100_enqueue_ldpc_enc(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
-	if (unlikely(num == 0))
+	int32_t aq_avail = acc_aq_avail(q_data, num);
+	if (unlikely((aq_avail <= 0) || (num == 0)))
 		return 0;
 	if (ops[0]->ldpc_enc.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
 		return acc100_enqueue_enc_tb(q_data, ops, num);
@@ -3164,8 +3166,11 @@ static uint16_t
 acc100_enqueue_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
-	if (unlikely(num == 0))
+	int32_t aq_avail = acc_aq_avail(q_data, num);
+
+	if (unlikely((aq_avail <= 0) || (num == 0)))
 		return 0;
+
 	if (ops[0]->turbo_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
 		return acc100_enqueue_dec_tb(q_data, ops, num);
 	else
@@ -3177,11 +3182,9 @@ static uint16_t
 acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, uint16_t num)
 {
-	struct acc_queue *q = q_data->queue_private;
-	int32_t aq_avail = q->aq_depth +
-			(q->aq_dequeued - q->aq_enqueued) / 128;
+	int32_t aq_avail = acc_aq_avail(q_data, num);
 
-	if (unlikely((aq_avail == 0) || (num == 0)))
+	if (unlikely((aq_avail <= 0) || (num == 0)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (ops[0]->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
@@ -3190,7 +3193,6 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 		return acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_cb(q_data, ops, num);
 }
 
-
 /* Dequeue one encode operations from ACC100 device in CB mode */
 static inline int
 dequeue_enc_one_op_cb(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ref_op,
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 03/29] baseband/acc100: memory leak fix

[Hernan Vargas]

Move check for undefined device before allocating queue data structure.

Coverity issue: 375803, 375813, 375819, 375827, 375831
Fixes: 060e7672930 ("baseband/acc100: add queue configuration")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 7fec2283eb..7500ef6eb5 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -663,6 +663,10 @@ acc100_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
 	struct acc_queue *q;
 	int16_t q_idx;
 
+	if (d == NULL) {
+		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Undefined device");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
 	/* Allocate the queue data structure. */
 	q = rte_zmalloc_socket(dev->device->driver->name, sizeof(*q),
 			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, conf->socket);
@@ -670,10 +674,6 @@ acc100_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Failed to allocate queue memory");
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	if (d == NULL) {
-		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Undefined device");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
 
 	q->d = d;
 	q->ring_addr = RTE_PTR_ADD(d->sw_rings, (d->sw_ring_size * queue_id));
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 04/29] baseband/acc100: add LDPC encoder padding function

[Hernan Vargas]

LDPC Encoder input may need to be padded to avoid small beat for ACC100.
Padding 5GDL input buffer length (BLEN) to avoid case (BLEN % 64) <= 8.
Adding protection for corner case to avoid for 5GDL occurrence of last
beat within the ACC100 fabric with <= 8B which might trigger a fabric
corner case hang issue.

Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 7500ef6eb5..577c107e9a 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1017,14 +1017,13 @@ acc100_fcw_td_fill(const struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_td *fcw)
 			RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_HALF_ITERATION_EVEN);
 }
 
-#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
-
 static inline bool
 is_acc100(struct acc_queue *q)
 {
 	return (q->d->device_variant == ACC100_VARIANT);
 }
 
+#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_DEBUG
 static inline bool
 validate_op_required(struct acc_queue *q)
 {
@@ -1355,12 +1354,28 @@ acc100_dma_fill_blk_type_in(struct acc_dma_req_desc *desc,
 	return next_triplet;
 }
 
+/* May need to pad LDPC Encoder input to avoid small beat for ACC100. */
+static inline uint16_t
+pad_le_in(uint16_t blen, struct acc_queue *q)
+{
+	uint16_t last_beat;
+
+	if (!is_acc100(q))
+		return blen;
+
+	last_beat = blen % 64;
+	if ((last_beat > 0) && (last_beat <= 8))
+		blen += 8;
+
+	return blen;
+}
+
 static inline int
 acc100_dma_desc_le_fill(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
 		struct acc_dma_req_desc *desc, struct rte_mbuf **input,
 		struct rte_mbuf *output, uint32_t *in_offset,
 		uint32_t *out_offset, uint32_t *out_length,
-		uint32_t *mbuf_total_left, uint32_t *seg_total_left)
+		uint32_t *mbuf_total_left, uint32_t *seg_total_left, struct acc_queue *q)
 {
 	int next_triplet = 1; /* FCW already done */
 	uint16_t K, in_length_in_bits, in_length_in_bytes;
@@ -1384,8 +1399,7 @@ acc100_dma_desc_le_fill(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
 	}
 
 	next_triplet = acc100_dma_fill_blk_type_in(desc, input, in_offset,
-			in_length_in_bytes,
-			seg_total_left, next_triplet);
+			pad_le_in(in_length_in_bytes, q), seg_total_left, next_triplet);
 	if (unlikely(next_triplet < 0)) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
 				"Mismatch between data to process and mbuf data length in bbdev_op: %p",
@@ -2035,7 +2049,7 @@ enqueue_ldpc_enc_n_op_cb(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops,
 	acc_header_init(&desc->req);
 	desc->req.numCBs = num;
 
-	in_length_in_bytes = ops[0]->ldpc_enc.input.data->data_len;
+	in_length_in_bytes = pad_le_in(ops[0]->ldpc_enc.input.data->data_len, q);
 	out_length = (enc->cb_params.e + 7) >> 3;
 	desc->req.m2dlen = 1 + num;
 	desc->req.d2mlen = num;
@@ -2102,7 +2116,7 @@ enqueue_ldpc_enc_one_op_cb(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
 
 	ret = acc100_dma_desc_le_fill(op, &desc->req, &input, output,
 			&in_offset, &out_offset, &out_length, &mbuf_total_left,
-			&seg_total_left);
+			&seg_total_left, q);
 
 	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
 		return ret;
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 05/29] baseband/acc100: check turbo dec/enc input

[Hernan Vargas]

Add NULL check for the turbo decoder and encoder input length.

Fixes: 3bfc5f60403 ("baseband/acc100: add debug function to validate input")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 577c107e9a..eba70654e8 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1764,6 +1764,11 @@ validate_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(turbo_enc->input.length == 0)) {
+		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "input length null");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	if (turbo_enc->code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK) {
 		tb = &turbo_enc->tb_params;
 		if ((tb->k_neg < RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MIN_CB_SIZE
@@ -1783,11 +1788,12 @@ validate_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
 					RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CB_SIZE);
 			return -1;
 		}
-		if (tb->c_neg > (RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS - 1))
+		if (unlikely(tb->c_neg > 0)) {
 			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
-					"c_neg (%u) is out of range 0 <= value <= %u",
-					tb->c_neg,
-					RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS - 1);
+					"c_neg (%u) expected to be null",
+					tb->c_neg);
+			return -1;
+		}
 		if (tb->c < 1 || tb->c > RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS) {
 			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
 					"c (%u) is out of range 1 <= value <= %u",
@@ -2281,6 +2287,11 @@ validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(turbo_dec->input.length == 0)) {
+		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "input length null");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	if (turbo_dec->code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK) {
 		tb = &turbo_dec->tb_params;
 		if ((tb->k_neg < RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MIN_CB_SIZE
@@ -2301,11 +2312,13 @@ validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
 					RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CB_SIZE);
 			return -1;
 		}
-		if (tb->c_neg > (RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS - 1))
+		if (unlikely(tb->c_neg > (RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS - 1))) {
 			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
 					"c_neg (%u) is out of range 0 <= value <= %u",
 					tb->c_neg,
 					RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS - 1);
+					return -1;
+		}
 		if (tb->c < 1 || tb->c > RTE_BBDEV_TURBO_MAX_CODE_BLOCKS) {
 			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
 					"c (%u) is out of range 1 <= value <= %u",
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 06/29] baseband/acc100: check for unlikely operation vals

[Hernan Vargas]

Add unlikely checks for NULL operation values.

Fixes: f404dfe35cc ("baseband/acc100: support 4G processing")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index eba70654e8..e8ec70d954 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -2180,6 +2180,10 @@ enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
 	r = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.r;
 
 	while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
+		if (unlikely(input == NULL)) {
+			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Not enough input segment");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 		seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) - in_offset;
 		/* Set up DMA descriptor */
 		desc = acc_desc(q, total_enqueued_cbs);
@@ -3097,6 +3101,8 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 			break;
 		enqueued_cbs += ret;
 	}
+	if (unlikely(enqueued_cbs == 0))
+		return 0; /* Nothing to enqueue */
 
 	acc_dma_enqueue(q, enqueued_cbs, &q_data->queue_stats);
 
@@ -3625,6 +3631,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) {
 		op = acc_op_tail(q, dequeued_cbs);
+		if (unlikely(op == NULL))
+			break;
 		if (op->turbo_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
 			ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs,
 					&aq_dequeued);
@@ -3670,6 +3678,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
 	for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) {
 		op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs)
 			& q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr;
+		if (unlikely(op == NULL))
+			break;
 		if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
 			ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs,
 					&aq_dequeued);
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 07/29] baseband/acc100: enforce additional check on FCW

[Hernan Vargas]

Enforce additional check on Frame Control Word validity and add stronger
alignment for decompression mode.

Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h     |  1 +
 drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     |  1 +
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h
index 9486e98521..eb6349c85a 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
 #define ACC100_HARQ_DDR         (512 * 1)
 #define ACC100_PRQ_DDR_VER       0x10092020
 #define ACC100_DDR_TRAINING_MAX (5000)
+#define ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP   256
 
 struct acc100_registry_addr {
 	unsigned int dma_ring_dl5g_hi;
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
index 6f141c95ce..97d10b8b40 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@
 
 #define ACC_ALGO_SPA                0
 #define ACC_ALGO_MSA                1
+#define ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B          64
 
 /* Helper macro for logging */
 #define rte_acc_log(level, fmt, ...) \
diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index e8ec70d954..13a762cb80 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1040,6 +1040,7 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 	uint16_t harq_index;
 	uint32_t l;
 	bool harq_prun = false;
+	uint32_t max_hc_in;
 
 	fcw->qm = op->ldpc_dec.q_m;
 	fcw->nfiller = op->ldpc_dec.n_filler;
@@ -1089,13 +1090,22 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 		harq_in_length = op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.length;
 		if (fcw->hcin_decomp_mode > 0)
 			harq_in_length = harq_in_length * 8 / 6;
-		harq_in_length = RTE_ALIGN(harq_in_length, 64);
-		if ((harq_layout[harq_index].offset > 0) & harq_prun) {
+
+		harq_in_length = RTE_MIN(harq_in_length, op->ldpc_dec.n_cb
+				- op->ldpc_dec.n_filler);
+
+		/* Alignment on next 64B - Already enforced from HC output */
+		harq_in_length = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(harq_in_length, ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B);
+
+		/* Stronger alignment requirement when in decompression mode */
+		if (fcw->hcin_decomp_mode > 0)
+			harq_in_length = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(harq_in_length, ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP);
+
+		if ((harq_layout[harq_index].offset > 0) && harq_prun) {
 			rte_bbdev_log_debug("HARQ IN offset unexpected for now\n");
 			fcw->hcin_size0 = harq_layout[harq_index].size0;
 			fcw->hcin_offset = harq_layout[harq_index].offset;
-			fcw->hcin_size1 = harq_in_length -
-					harq_layout[harq_index].offset;
+			fcw->hcin_size1 = harq_in_length - harq_layout[harq_index].offset;
 		} else {
 			fcw->hcin_size0 = harq_in_length;
 			fcw->hcin_offset = 0;
@@ -1107,6 +1117,21 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 		fcw->hcin_size1 = 0;
 	}
 
+	/* Enforce additional check on FCW validity */
+	max_hc_in = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(fcw->ncb - fcw->nfiller, ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B);
+	if ((fcw->hcin_size0 > max_hc_in) ||
+			(fcw->hcin_size1 + fcw->hcin_offset > max_hc_in) ||
+			((fcw->hcin_size0 > fcw->hcin_offset) &&
+			(fcw->hcin_size1 != 0))) {
+		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, " Invalid FCW : HCIn %d %d %d, Ncb %d F %d",
+				fcw->hcin_size0, fcw->hcin_size1,
+				fcw->hcin_offset,
+				fcw->ncb, fcw->nfiller);
+		/* Disable HARQ input in that case to carry forward */
+		op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
+		fcw->hcin_en = 0;
+	}
+
 	fcw->itmax = op->ldpc_dec.iter_max;
 	fcw->itstop = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
 			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_ITERATION_STOP_ENABLE);
@@ -1131,15 +1156,27 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 	if (fcw->hcout_en > 0) {
 		parity_offset = (op->ldpc_dec.basegraph == 1 ? 20 : 8)
 			* op->ldpc_dec.z_c - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler;
-		k0_p = (fcw->k0 > parity_offset) ?
-				fcw->k0 - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler : fcw->k0;
+		k0_p = (fcw->k0 > parity_offset) ? fcw->k0 - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler : fcw->k0;
 		ncb_p = fcw->ncb - op->ldpc_dec.n_filler;
-		l = k0_p + fcw->rm_e;
+		l = RTE_MIN(k0_p + fcw->rm_e, INT16_MAX);
 		harq_out_length = (uint16_t) fcw->hcin_size0;
-		harq_out_length = RTE_MIN(RTE_MAX(harq_out_length, l), ncb_p);
-		harq_out_length = (harq_out_length + 0x3F) & 0xFFC0;
-		if ((k0_p > fcw->hcin_size0 + ACC_HARQ_OFFSET_THRESHOLD) &&
-				harq_prun) {
+		harq_out_length = RTE_MAX(harq_out_length, l);
+
+		/* Stronger alignment when in compression mode */
+		if (fcw->hcout_comp_mode > 0)
+			harq_out_length = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(harq_out_length, ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP);
+
+		/* Cannot exceed the pruned Ncb circular buffer */
+		harq_out_length = RTE_MIN(harq_out_length, ncb_p);
+
+		/* Alignment on next 64B */
+		harq_out_length = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(harq_out_length, ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B);
+
+		/* Stronger alignment when in compression mode enforced again */
+		if (fcw->hcout_comp_mode > 0)
+			harq_out_length = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(harq_out_length, ACC100_HARQ_ALIGN_COMP);
+
+		if ((k0_p > fcw->hcin_size0 + ACC_HARQ_OFFSET_THRESHOLD) && harq_prun) {
 			fcw->hcout_size0 = (uint16_t) fcw->hcin_size0;
 			fcw->hcout_offset = k0_p & 0xFFC0;
 			fcw->hcout_size1 = harq_out_length - fcw->hcout_offset;
@@ -1148,6 +1185,14 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 			fcw->hcout_size1 = 0;
 			fcw->hcout_offset = 0;
 		}
+
+		if (fcw->hcout_size0 == 0) {
+			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, " Invalid FCW : HCout %d",
+				fcw->hcout_size0);
+			op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_OUT_ENABLE;
+			fcw->hcout_en = 0;
+		}
+
 		harq_layout[harq_index].offset = fcw->hcout_offset;
 		harq_layout[harq_index].size0 = fcw->hcout_size0;
 	} else {
@@ -1188,6 +1233,10 @@ acc101_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 		/* Disable HARQ input in that case to carry forward */
 		op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
 	}
+	if (unlikely(fcw->rm_e == 0)) {
+		rte_bbdev_log(WARNING, "Null E input provided");
+		fcw->rm_e = 2;
+	}
 
 	fcw->hcin_en = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
 			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE);
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 08/29] baseband/acc100: allocate ring/queue mem when NULL

[Hernan Vargas]

Allocate info ring, tail pointers and HARQ layout memory for a device
only if it hasn't already been allocated.

Fixes: 06531464151 ("baseband/acc100: support interrupt")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 13a762cb80..b737374d71 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -408,9 +408,9 @@ allocate_info_ring(struct rte_bbdev *dev)
 		reg_addr = &vf_reg_addr;
 	/* Allocate InfoRing */
 	d->info_ring = rte_zmalloc_socket("Info Ring",
-			ACC_INFO_RING_NUM_ENTRIES *
-			sizeof(*d->info_ring), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
-			dev->data->socket_id);
+		ACC_INFO_RING_NUM_ENTRIES *
+		sizeof(*d->info_ring), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
+		dev->data->socket_id);
 	if (d->info_ring == NULL) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
 				"Failed to allocate Info Ring for %s:%u",
@@ -499,7 +499,8 @@ acc100_setup_queues(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t num_queues, int socket_id)
 	acc_reg_write(d, reg_addr->ring_size, value);
 
 	/* Configure tail pointer for use when SDONE enabled */
-	d->tail_ptrs = rte_zmalloc_socket(
+	if (d->tail_ptrs == NULL)
+		d->tail_ptrs = rte_zmalloc_socket(
 			dev->device->driver->name,
 			ACC100_NUM_QGRPS * ACC100_NUM_AQS * sizeof(uint32_t),
 			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
@@ -507,8 +508,8 @@ acc100_setup_queues(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t num_queues, int socket_id)
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Failed to allocate tail ptr for %s:%u",
 				dev->device->driver->name,
 				dev->data->dev_id);
-		rte_free(d->sw_rings);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_sw_rings;
 	}
 	d->tail_ptr_iova = rte_malloc_virt2iova(d->tail_ptrs);
 
@@ -531,15 +532,16 @@ acc100_setup_queues(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t num_queues, int socket_id)
 		/* Continue */
 	}
 
-	d->harq_layout = rte_zmalloc_socket("HARQ Layout",
+	if (d->harq_layout == NULL)
+		d->harq_layout = rte_zmalloc_socket("HARQ Layout",
 			ACC_HARQ_LAYOUT * sizeof(*d->harq_layout),
 			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
 	if (d->harq_layout == NULL) {
 		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Failed to allocate harq_layout for %s:%u",
 				dev->device->driver->name,
 				dev->data->dev_id);
-		rte_free(d->sw_rings);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_tail_ptrs;
 	}
 
 	/* Mark as configured properly */
@@ -548,8 +550,16 @@ acc100_setup_queues(struct rte_bbdev *dev, uint16_t num_queues, int socket_id)
 	rte_bbdev_log_debug(
 			"ACC100 (%s) configured  sw_rings = %p, sw_rings_iova = %#"
 			PRIx64, dev->data->name, d->sw_rings, d->sw_rings_iova);
-
 	return 0;
+
+free_tail_ptrs:
+	rte_free(d->tail_ptrs);
+	d->tail_ptrs = NULL;
+free_sw_rings:
+	rte_free(d->sw_rings_base);
+	d->sw_rings = NULL;
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 09/29] baseband/acc100: reduce input length for CRC24B

[Hernan Vargas]

Input length should be reduced only for CRC24B.

Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index b737374d71..7ec63dc470 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1444,8 +1444,7 @@ acc100_dma_desc_le_fill(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
 
 	K = (enc->basegraph == 1 ? 22 : 10) * enc->z_c;
 	in_length_in_bits = K - enc->n_filler;
-	if ((enc->op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_CRC_24A_ATTACH) ||
-			(enc->op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_CRC_24B_ATTACH))
+	if (enc->op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_CRC_24B_ATTACH)
 		in_length_in_bits -= 24;
 	in_length_in_bytes = in_length_in_bits >> 3;
 
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 10/29] baseband/acc100: fix clearing PF IR outside handler

[Hernan Vargas]

Clearing of PF info ring outside of handler may cause interrupt to be
missed.
A condition in the ACC100 PMD implementation may cause an interrupt
functional handler call to be missed due to related bit being cleared
when checking PF info ring status.

Fixes: 06531464151 ("baseband/acc100: support interrupt")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 7ec63dc470..3bb93a1e07 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -262,11 +262,12 @@ acc100_check_ir(struct acc_device *acc100_dev)
 	while (ring_data->valid) {
 		if ((ring_data->int_nb < ACC100_PF_INT_DMA_DL_DESC_IRQ) || (
 				ring_data->int_nb >
-				ACC100_PF_INT_DMA_DL5G_DESC_IRQ))
+				ACC100_PF_INT_DMA_DL5G_DESC_IRQ)) {
 			rte_bbdev_log(WARNING, "InfoRing: ITR:%d Info:0x%x",
 				ring_data->int_nb, ring_data->detailed_info);
-		/* Initialize Info Ring entry and move forward */
-		ring_data->val = 0;
+			/* Initialize Info Ring entry and move forward */
+			ring_data->val = 0;
+		}
 		info_ring_head++;
 		ring_data = acc100_dev->info_ring +
 				(info_ring_head & ACC_INFO_RING_MASK);
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 11/29] baseband/acc100: set device min alignment to 1

[Hernan Vargas]

Historical mistakes, there should be no 64B alignment requirement for
the buffer being processed. Any 1B alignment is sufficient.

Fixes: 9200ffa5cd5 ("baseband/acc100: add info get function")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 3bb93a1e07..600a10b9fb 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ acc100_dev_info_get(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
 			d->acc_conf.q_ul_4g.num_qgroups - 1;
 	dev_info->default_queue_conf = default_queue_conf;
 	dev_info->cpu_flag_reqs = NULL;
-	dev_info->min_alignment = 64;
+	dev_info->min_alignment = 1;
 	dev_info->capabilities = bbdev_capabilities;
 #ifdef ACC100_EXT_MEM
 	dev_info->harq_buffer_size = d->ddr_size;
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 12/29] baseband/acc100: add protection for NULL HARQ input

[Hernan Vargas]

It is possible to cause an invalid HW operation in case the user
provides the BBDEV API and HARQ operation with input enabled and zero
input. Adding protection for that case.

Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index 600a10b9fb..a711862892 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -1068,6 +1068,14 @@ acc100_fcw_ld_fill(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_fcw_ld *fcw,
 						op->ldpc_dec.tb_params.ea :
 						op->ldpc_dec.tb_params.eb;
 
+	if (unlikely(check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
+			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE) &&
+			(op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.length == 0))) {
+		rte_bbdev_log(WARNING, "Null HARQ input size provided");
+		/* Disable HARQ input in that case to carry forward. */
+		op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
+	}
+
 	fcw->hcin_en = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
 			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE);
 	fcw->hcout_en = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
-- 
2.37.1

[PATCH v5 13/29] baseband/acc100: reset pointer after rte_free

[Hernan Vargas]

Set local pointer to NULL after rte_free.
This needs to be set explicitly since logic may check for null pointers.

Fixes: 060e7672930 ("baseband/acc100: add queue configuration")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
index a711862892..ad815ed76a 100644
--- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
@@ -618,6 +618,9 @@ acc100_dev_close(struct rte_bbdev *dev)
 		rte_free(d->info_ring);
 		rte_free(d->sw_rings_base);
 		d->sw_rings_base = NULL;
+		d->tail_ptrs = NULL;
+		d->info_ring = NULL;
+		d->harq_layout = NULL;
 	}
 	/* Ensure all in flight HW transactions are completed */
 	usleep(ACC_LONG_WAIT);
-- 
2.37.1

Re: [PATCH v5 01/29] baseband/acc100: fix ring availability calculation

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 10/21/22 07:20, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Refactor of the queue availability computation to prevent the
> application to dequeue more than what may have been enqueued.
> 
> Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Re: [PATCH v5 02/29] baseband/acc100: add function to check AQ availability

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 10/21/22 07:20, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> It is possible for some corner case to run more batch enqueue than
> supported. A protection is required to avoid that corner case.
> Enhance all ACC100 enqueue operations with check to see if there is room
> in the atomic queue for enqueueing batches into the queue manager
> Check room in AQ for the enqueues batches into Qmgr
> 
> Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Re: [PATCH v5 07/29] baseband/acc100: enforce additional check on FCW

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 10/21/22 07:20, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Enforce additional check on Frame Control Word validity and add stronger
> alignment for decompression mode.
> 
> Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc100_pmd.h     |  1 +
>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     |  1 +
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime

Re: [PATCH v5 08/29] baseband/acc100: allocate ring/queue mem when NULL

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 10/21/22 07:20, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Allocate info ring, tail pointers and HARQ layout memory for a device
> only if it hasn't already been allocated.
> 
> Fixes: 06531464151 ("baseband/acc100: support interrupt")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime