Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
>>>>
>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web page, it may
>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
> 
> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).

Looks good, thanks.

> Thanks for the report.
> 
> 
>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different location in
>> webpage:
>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
>>
>> Can we reduce it into single place?
>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
> 
> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of vendors.
> I think we don't need all the details here.
> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in core.dpdk.org.
> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and precisely with patches.
> 
> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and other HW,
> and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.

+1

> 
> 
>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is almost not
>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can we fix it?
> 
> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux Foundation.
> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on the name.
> Example:
> 	https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/

Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in support
page.

> 
> 
> ---------------------
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
>  - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571, 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
>  - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576, 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
>  - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599, X520, X540, X550)
> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722)
> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710, X722, XXV710)
>  - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
>  
>  {{% notice note %}}
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>  weight = "8"
>  +++
>  
> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet Processor v2)
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
>  +++
>  
>  - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3, ConnectX-3 Pro)
> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4, ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
> 
> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
>  weight = "13"
>  +++
>  
> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx)
> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx, SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
> 
> 
>