From: Trishan de Lanerolle <tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
web@dpdk.org, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, qiming.yang@intel.com,
Jill Lovato <jlovato@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] supported hardware list
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 07:23:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFXL6f986XcVXg4by_jTe7B=DL_WnQgdQgjeTpnhG0tW5W88cA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec900ada-c8f6-fe06-c785-1d3d236511b9@intel.com>
Hi Ferruh,
Thanks for your mail. The ecosystem page points to
http://core.dpdk.org/supported/ which is the page of reference for the
hardware. The ecosystem page is not meant to be exhaustive list and just a
sample to show diversity of available hardware, the URLs point to the
respective pages in core. Ie. Intel page goes to
http://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/ .
We will be simplifying the Ecosystem page in the future to make it clearer.
Trishan
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:15 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> On 7/2/2018 11:32 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 6/28/2018 9:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 28/06/2018 18:45, Ferruh Yigit:
> >>> On 5/29/2018 9:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>>> 29/05/2018 04:19, Wenzhuo Lu:
> >>>>> From: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> XXV710 is pre-enabled on v16.11 and be validated on v17.02.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reference commit: 75d133dd32963c6897f97077c270082f1b4fef4e
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Applied, thanks
> >>>
> >>> Hi Thomas,
> >>>
> >>> I can't see this information (XXV710 as supported NIC) in the web
> page, it may
> >>> be lost somehow, how can we add it back?
> >>
> >> Yes it has been lost with other NICs recent update when migrating.
> >> I have fixed it for core.dpdk.org (see the patch below).
> >
> > Looks good, thanks.
> >
> >> Thanks for the report.
> >>
> >>
> >>> And supported hardware information is presented in two different
> location in
> >>> webpage:
> >>> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/
> >>> https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware
> >>>
> >>> Can we reduce it into single place?
> >>> Is ecosystem good place for listing hardware support?
> >>
> >> I think the intent of the ecosystem page was to show a diversity of
> vendors.
> >> I think we don't need all the details here.
> >> As it is more a technical DPDK info, I think it should be in
> core.dpdk.org.
> >> And it will be easier to update the device models regularly and
> precisely with patches.
> >>
> >> I suggest to limit the ecosystem page at vendor names, add CPU and
> other HW,
> >> and point to the core.dpdk.org page for details.
> >
> > +1
>
> "https://www.dpdk.org/ecosystem/#hardware" is still there and XXV710 is
> still
> missing!
>
> What is the process of updating LF managed web pages? Is someone tracking
> this
> mail list?
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> And as last, formatting of multiple device listing is not good, it is
> almost not
> >>> readable for Intel ones on https://core.dpdk.org/supported/, how can
> we fix it?
> >>
> >> Yes, this the format proposed in the first version drafted by the Linux
> Foundation.
> >> I have not changed it because I am not sure what is better.
> >> There is a nice page well formatted for each vendor when clicking on
> the name.
> >> Example:
> >> https://core.dpdk.org/supported/nics/intel/
> >
> > Yes this page look better, I think it is better to have similar view in
> support
> > page.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/intel.md
> >> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ weight = "7"
> >> - [e1000e](http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/drivers/net/e1000/) (82571,
> 82572, 82573, 82574, 82583, ICH8, ICH9, ICH10, PCH, PCH2, I217, I218, I219)
> >> - [igb](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/igb.html) (82575, 82576,
> 82580, I210, I211, I350, I354, DH89xx)
> >> - [ixgbe](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ixgbe.html) (82598, 82599,
> X520, X540, X550)
> >> -- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710,
> X722)
> >> +- [i40e](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/i40e.html) (X710, XL710,
> X722, XXV710)
> >> - [fm10k](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/fm10k.html) (FM10420)
> >>
> >> {{% notice note %}}
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/marvell.md
> >> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
> >> weight = "8"
> >> +++
> >>
> >> -- [mrvl](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet
> Processor v2)
> >> +- [mvpp2](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mvpp2.html) (Marvell Packet
> Processor v2)
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/mellanox.md
> >> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ weight = "9"
> >> +++
> >>
> >> - [mlx4](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx4.html) (ConnectX-3,
> ConnectX-3 Pro)
> >> -- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4,
> ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5)
> >> +- [mlx5](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/mlx5.html) (ConnectX-4,
> ConnectX-4 Lx, ConnectX-5, Bluefield)
> >>
> >> --- a/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> >> +++ b/content/supported/NICs/solarflare.md
> >> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ type = "nic"
> >> weight = "13"
> >> +++
> >>
> >> -- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx,
> SFN8xxx)
> >> +- [sfc_efx](http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/sfc_efx.html) (SFN7xxx,
> SFN8xxx, XtremeScale X2)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Trishan R. de Lanerolle
Program Manager, Networking
Linux Foundation
voice: +1.203.699.6401
skype: tdelanerolle
email: tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-21 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 2:32 [dpdk-web] [PATCH] add XXV710 to i40e suppported NICs Wenzhuo Lu
2018-05-16 5:50 ` Zhang, Helin
2018-05-16 8:26 ` Mcnamara, John
2018-05-17 13:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-29 2:19 ` [dpdk-web] [PATCH v2] " Wenzhuo Lu
2018-05-29 8:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-06-28 16:45 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-28 20:11 ` [dpdk-web] supported hardware list Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-02 10:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-08-21 11:15 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-08-21 11:23 ` Trishan de Lanerolle [this message]
2018-08-21 11:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-03 7:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFXL6f986XcVXg4by_jTe7B=DL_WnQgdQgjeTpnhG0tW5W88cA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tdelanerolle@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jlovato@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=web@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).