From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Yoan Picchi <yoan.picchi@arm.com>,
Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <nd@arm.com>, Harjot Singh <harjot.singh@arm.com>,
Nathan Brown <nathan.brown@arm.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:57:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba747ce-eeab-5ad5-9e38-596584c73ad0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311232112.736613-5-yoan.picchi@arm.com>
Hi Yoan,
On 2024/3/12 7:21, Yoan Picchi wrote:
> - Implemented SVE code for comparing signatures in bulk lookup.
> - Added Defines in code for SVE code support.
> - Optimise NEON code
This commit does not include this part. Pls only describe the content in this commit.
> - New SVE code is ~5% slower than optimized NEON for N2 processor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoan Picchi <yoan.picchi@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harjot Singh <harjot.singh@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Brown <nathan.brown@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
> lib/hash/arch/arm/compare_signatures.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 2 +
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/hash/arch/arm/compare_signatures.h b/lib/hash/arch/arm/compare_signatures.h
> index b5a457f936..8a0627e119 100644
> --- a/lib/hash/arch/arm/compare_signatures.h
> +++ b/lib/hash/arch/arm/compare_signatures.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,64 @@ compare_signatures_dense(uint16_t *hitmask_buffer,
> *hitmask_buffer = vaddvq_u16(hit2);
> }
> break;
> +#endif
> +#if defined(RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE)
> + case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SVE: {
...
> #endif
> default:
> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) {
> diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> index e41f03270a..7a474267f0 100644
> --- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> +++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> @@ -452,6 +452,8 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params)
> #elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON)) {
> h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON;
> + if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE))
> + h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SVE;
The RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SVE was defined in "PATCH v6 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup",
but its first use is in this commit, so I think it should defined in this commit.
If RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE and RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE both set, then SVE impl will be chosen.
If RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE defined, but RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE was not, then scalar will be chosen. --- in this case we could back to NEON impl.
So I suggest direct use "#if defined(RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE)" here.
> }
> else
> #endif
>
Plus:
I notice the commit log said the SVE performance is slower than NEON.
And I also notice other platform SVE also lower than NEON,
1. b4ee9c07bd config/arm: disable SVE ACLE for CN10K
2. 4eea7c6461 config/arm: add SVE ACLE control flag
So maybe we should disable RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE default by:
diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build
index 9d6fb87d7f..a5b890d100 100644
--- a/config/arm/meson.build
+++ b/config/arm/meson.build
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ endif
if cc.get_define('__ARM_FEATURE_SVE', args: machine_args) != ''
compile_time_cpuflags += ['RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE']
- if (cc.check_header('arm_sve.h') and soc_config.get('sve_acle', true))
+ if (cc.check_header('arm_sve.h') and soc_config.get('sve_acle', false))
dpdk_conf.set('RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE', 1)
endif
endif
If the platform verify SVE has higher performance, then it could enable SVE by add "sve_acle: true" in soc_xxx config.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 16:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-02-28 10:56 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-02-28 14:48 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-04 13:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-03-05 15:36 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 3:57 ` fengchengwen [this message]
2024-03-12 15:08 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-03-19 10:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-03-19 13:09 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-19 13:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-03-19 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-03-20 7:37 ` [EXTERNAL] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2024-04-11 13:32 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 18:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ba747ce-eeab-5ad5-9e38-596584c73ad0@huawei.com \
--to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harjot.singh@arm.com \
--cc=nathan.brown@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yoan.picchi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).