From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
To: Yoan Picchi <yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com>,
Yoan Picchi <yoan.picchi@arm.com>,
Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>,
Harjot Singh <harjot.singh@arm.com>,
Nathan Brown <nathan.brown@arm.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:35:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ede8330c0b4c2cb213cdc7102d4e86@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8d11023-773b-4676-a6d9-25869f3e4b24@foss.arm.com>
> >> - Implemented SVE code for comparing signatures in bulk lookup.
> >> - Added Defines in code for SVE code support.
> >> - Optimise NEON code
> >> - New SVE code is ~5% slower than optimized NEON for N2 processor.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yoan Picchi <yoan.picchi@arm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Harjot Singh <harjot.singh@arm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Nathan Brown <nathan.brown@arm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >> lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> >> index a07dd3a28d..231d6d6ded 100644
> >> --- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> >> +++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> >> @@ -442,8 +442,11 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params)
> >> h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE;
> >> else
> >> #elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> >> - if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON))
> >> + if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON)) {
> >> h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON;
> >> + if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE))
> >> + h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SVE;
> >> + }
> >> else
> >> #endif
> >> h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR;
> >> @@ -1860,37 +1863,103 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h,
> >> #if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >>
> >> static inline void
> >> -compare_signatures_dense(uint32_t *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
> >> - const struct rte_hash_bucket *prim_bkt,
> >> - const struct rte_hash_bucket *sec_bkt,
> >> +compare_signatures_dense(uint16_t *hitmask_buffer,
> >> + const uint16_t *prim_bucket_sigs,
> >> + const uint16_t *sec_bucket_sigs,
> >> uint16_t sig,
> >> enum rte_hash_sig_compare_function sig_cmp_fn)
> >> {
> >> unsigned int i;
> >>
> >> + static_assert(sizeof(*hitmask_buffer) >= 2*(RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES/8),
> >> + "The hitmask must be exactly wide enough to accept the whole hitmask if it is dense");
> >> +
> >> /* For match mask every bits indicates the match */
> >> switch (sig_cmp_fn) {
> >
> > Can I ask to move arch specific comparison code into some arch-specific headers or so?
> > It is getting really hard to read and understand the generic code with all these ifdefs and arch specific instructions...
> >
Hi, apologies for long delay in response.
> I can easily enough move the compare_signatures into an arm/x86
> directory, and have a default version in the code.
Yes, that's what I thought about.
> The problem would be for bulk lookup. The function is already duplicated
> 2 times (the l and lf version). If I remove the #ifdefs, I'll need to
> duplicate them again into 4 nearly identical versions (dense and
> sparse). The only third options I see would be some preprocessor macro
> to patch the function, but that looks even dirtier to me.
Not sure I understood you here: from looking at the code I don't see any
arch specific ifdefs in bulk_lookup() routines.
What I am missing here?
> I think duplicating the code would be bad, but I can do it if you want.
> Unless you have a better solution?
>
> >> +#if RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES <= 8
> >> case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON: {
> >> - uint16x8_t vmat, x;
> >> + uint16x8_t vmat, hit1, hit2;
> >> const uint16x8_t mask = {0x1, 0x2, 0x4, 0x8, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80};
> >> const uint16x8_t vsig = vld1q_dup_u16((uint16_t const *)&sig);
> >>
> >> /* Compare all signatures in the primary bucket */
> >> - vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig, vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)prim_bkt->sig_current));
> >> - x = vandq_u16(vmat, mask);
> >> - *prim_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vaddvq_u16(x));
> >> + vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig, vld1q_u16(prim_bucket_sigs));
> >> + hit1 = vandq_u16(vmat, mask);
> >> +
> >> /* Compare all signatures in the secondary bucket */
> >> - vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig, vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)sec_bkt->sig_current));
> >> - x = vandq_u16(vmat, mask);
> >> - *sec_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vaddvq_u16(x));
> >> + vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig, vld1q_u16(sec_bucket_sigs));
> >> + hit2 = vandq_u16(vmat, mask);
> >> +
> >> + hit2 = vshlq_n_u16(hit2, RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES);
> >> + hit2 = vorrq_u16(hit1, hit2);
> >> + *hitmask_buffer = vaddvq_u16(hit2);
> >> + }
> >> + break;
> >> +#endif
> >> +#if defined(RTE_HAS_SVE_ACLE)
> >> + case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SVE: {
> >> + svuint16_t vsign, shift, sv_matches;
> >> + svbool_t pred, match, bucket_wide_pred;
> >> + int i = 0;
> >> + uint64_t vl = svcnth();
> >> +
> >> + vsign = svdup_u16(sig);
> >> + shift = svindex_u16(0, 1);
> >> +
> >> + if (vl >= 2 * RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES && RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES <= 8) {
> >> + svuint16_t primary_array_vect, secondary_array_vect;
> >> + bucket_wide_pred = svwhilelt_b16(0, RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES);
> >> + primary_array_vect = svld1_u16(bucket_wide_pred, prim_bucket_sigs);
> >> + secondary_array_vect = svld1_u16(bucket_wide_pred, sec_bucket_sigs);
> >> +
> >> + /* We merged the two vectors so we can do both comparison at once */
> >> + primary_array_vect = svsplice_u16(bucket_wide_pred,
> >> + primary_array_vect,
> >> + secondary_array_vect);
> >> + pred = svwhilelt_b16(0, 2*RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES);
> >> +
> >> + /* Compare all signatures in the buckets */
> >> + match = svcmpeq_u16(pred, vsign, primary_array_vect);
> >> + if (svptest_any(svptrue_b16(), match)) {
> >> + sv_matches = svdup_u16(1);
> >> + sv_matches = svlsl_u16_z(match, sv_matches, shift);
> >> + *hitmask_buffer = svorv_u16(svptrue_b16(), sv_matches);
> >> + }
> >> + } else {
> >> + do {
> >> + pred = svwhilelt_b16(i, RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES);
> >> + uint16_t lower_half = 0;
> >> + uint16_t upper_half = 0;
> >> + /* Compare all signatures in the primary bucket */
> >> + match = svcmpeq_u16(pred, vsign, svld1_u16(pred,
> >> + &prim_bucket_sigs[i]));
> >> + if (svptest_any(svptrue_b16(), match)) {
> >> + sv_matches = svdup_u16(1);
> >> + sv_matches = svlsl_u16_z(match, sv_matches, shift);
> >> + lower_half = svorv_u16(svptrue_b16(), sv_matches);
> >> + }
> >> + /* Compare all signatures in the secondary bucket */
> >> + match = svcmpeq_u16(pred, vsign, svld1_u16(pred,
> >> + &sec_bucket_sigs[i]));
> >> + if (svptest_any(svptrue_b16(), match)) {
> >> + sv_matches = svdup_u16(1);
> >> + sv_matches = svlsl_u16_z(match, sv_matches, shift);
> >> + upper_half = svorv_u16(svptrue_b16(), sv_matches)
> >> + << RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES;
> >> + }
> >> + hitmask_buffer[i/8] = upper_half | lower_half;
> >> + i += vl;
> >> + } while (i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES);
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> break;
> >> +#endif
> >> default:
> >> for (i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) {
> >> - *prim_hash_matches |=
> >> - ((sig == prim_bkt->sig_current[i]) << i);
> >> - *sec_hash_matches |=
> >> - ((sig == sec_bkt->sig_current[i]) << i);
> >> + *hitmask_buffer |=
> >> + ((sig == prim_bucket_sigs[i]) << i);
> >> + *hitmask_buffer |=
> >> + ((sig == sec_bucket_sigs[i]) << i) << RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> @@ -1908,7 +1977,7 @@ compare_signatures_sparse(uint32_t *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matche
> >>
> >> /* For match mask the first bit of every two bits indicates the match */
> >> switch (sig_cmp_fn) {
> >> -#if defined(__SSE2__)
> >> +#if defined(__SSE2__) && RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES <= 8
> >> case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE:
> >> /* Compare all signatures in the bucket */
> >> *prim_hash_matches = _mm_movemask_epi8(_mm_cmpeq_epi16(
> >> @@ -1948,14 +2017,18 @@ __bulk_lookup_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> uint64_t hits = 0;
> >> int32_t i;
> >> int32_t ret;
> >> - uint32_t prim_hitmask[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> - uint32_t sec_hitmask[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, *next_bkt;
> >>
> >> #if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >> const int hitmask_padding = 0;
> >> + uint16_t hitmask_buffer[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> +
> >> + static_assert(sizeof(*hitmask_buffer)*8/2 == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES,
> >> + "The hitmask must be exactly wide enough to accept the whole hitmask when it is dense");
> >> #else
> >> const int hitmask_padding = 1;
> >> + uint32_t prim_hitmask_buffer[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> + uint32_t sec_hitmask_buffer[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> __hash_rw_reader_lock(h);
> >> @@ -1963,18 +2036,24 @@ __bulk_lookup_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> /* Compare signatures and prefetch key slot of first hit */
> >> for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
> >> #if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >> - compare_signatures_dense(&prim_hitmask[i], &sec_hitmask[i],
> >> - primary_bkt[i], secondary_bkt[i],
> >> + uint16_t *hitmask = &hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + compare_signatures_dense(hitmask,
> >> + primary_bkt[i]->sig_current,
> >> + secondary_bkt[i]->sig_current,
> >> sig[i], h->sig_cmp_fn);
> >> + const unsigned int prim_hitmask = *(uint8_t *)(hitmask);
> >> + const unsigned int sec_hitmask = *((uint8_t *)(hitmask)+1);
> >> #else
> >> - compare_signatures_sparse(&prim_hitmask[i], &sec_hitmask[i],
> >> + compare_signatures_sparse(&prim_hitmask_buffer[i], &sec_hitmask_buffer[i],
> >> primary_bkt[i], secondary_bkt[i],
> >> sig[i], h->sig_cmp_fn);
> >> + const unsigned int prim_hitmask = prim_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + const unsigned int sec_hitmask = sec_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> - if (prim_hitmask[i]) {
> >> + if (prim_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t first_hit =
> >> - rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> primary_bkt[i]->key_idx[first_hit];
> >> @@ -1986,9 +2065,9 @@ __bulk_lookup_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> continue;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (sec_hitmask[i]) {
> >> + if (sec_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t first_hit =
> >> - rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> secondary_bkt[i]->key_idx[first_hit];
> >> @@ -2003,9 +2082,17 @@ __bulk_lookup_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */
> >> for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
> >> positions[i] = -ENOENT;
> >> - while (prim_hitmask[i]) {
> >> +#if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >> + uint16_t *hitmask = &hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + unsigned int prim_hitmask = *(uint8_t *)(hitmask);
> >> + unsigned int sec_hitmask = *((uint8_t *)(hitmask)+1);
> >> +#else
> >> + unsigned int prim_hitmask = prim_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + unsigned int sec_hitmask = sec_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> +#endif
> >> + while (prim_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t hit_index =
> >> - rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> primary_bkt[i]->key_idx[hit_index];
> >> @@ -2028,12 +2115,12 @@ __bulk_lookup_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> positions[i] = key_idx - 1;
> >> goto next_key;
> >> }
> >> - prim_hitmask[i] &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> + prim_hitmask &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> }
> >>
> >> - while (sec_hitmask[i]) {
> >> + while (sec_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t hit_index =
> >> - rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> secondary_bkt[i]->key_idx[hit_index];
> >> @@ -2057,7 +2144,7 @@ __bulk_lookup_l(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> positions[i] = key_idx - 1;
> >> goto next_key;
> >> }
> >> - sec_hitmask[i] &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> + sec_hitmask &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> }
> >> next_key:
> >> continue;
> >> @@ -2107,15 +2194,18 @@ __bulk_lookup_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> uint64_t hits = 0;
> >> int32_t i;
> >> int32_t ret;
> >> - uint32_t prim_hitmask[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> - uint32_t sec_hitmask[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, *next_bkt;
> >> uint32_t cnt_b, cnt_a;
> >>
> >> #if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >> const int hitmask_padding = 0;
> >> + uint16_t hitmask_buffer[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> + static_assert(sizeof(*hitmask_buffer)*8/2 == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES,
> >> + "The hitmask must be exactly wide enough to accept the whole hitmask chen it is dense");
> >> #else
> >> const int hitmask_padding = 1;
> >> + uint32_t prim_hitmask_buffer[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> + uint32_t sec_hitmask_buffer[RTE_HASH_LOOKUP_BULK_MAX] = {0};
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++)
> >> @@ -2132,18 +2222,24 @@ __bulk_lookup_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> /* Compare signatures and prefetch key slot of first hit */
> >> for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
> >> #if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >> - compare_signatures_dense(&prim_hitmask[i], &sec_hitmask[i],
> >> - primary_bkt[i], secondary_bkt[i],
> >> + uint16_t *hitmask = &hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + compare_signatures_dense(hitmask,
> >> + primary_bkt[i]->sig_current,
> >> + secondary_bkt[i]->sig_current,
> >> sig[i], h->sig_cmp_fn);
> >> + const unsigned int prim_hitmask = *(uint8_t *)(hitmask);
> >> + const unsigned int sec_hitmask = *((uint8_t *)(hitmask)+1);
> >> #else
> >> - compare_signatures_sparse(&prim_hitmask[i], &sec_hitmask[i],
> >> + compare_signatures_sparse(&prim_hitmask_buffer[i], &sec_hitmask_buffer[i],
> >> primary_bkt[i], secondary_bkt[i],
> >> sig[i], h->sig_cmp_fn);
> >> + const unsigned int prim_hitmask = prim_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + const unsigned int sec_hitmask = sec_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> - if (prim_hitmask[i]) {
> >> + if (prim_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t first_hit =
> >> - rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> primary_bkt[i]->key_idx[first_hit];
> >> @@ -2155,9 +2251,9 @@ __bulk_lookup_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> continue;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (sec_hitmask[i]) {
> >> + if (sec_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t first_hit =
> >> - rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> secondary_bkt[i]->key_idx[first_hit];
> >> @@ -2171,9 +2267,17 @@ __bulk_lookup_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >>
> >> /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */
> >> for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) {
> >> - while (prim_hitmask[i]) {
> >> +#if defined(__ARM_NEON)
> >> + uint16_t *hitmask = &hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + unsigned int prim_hitmask = *(uint8_t *)(hitmask);
> >> + unsigned int sec_hitmask = *((uint8_t *)(hitmask)+1);
> >> +#else
> >> + unsigned int prim_hitmask = prim_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> + unsigned int sec_hitmask = sec_hitmask_buffer[i];
> >> +#endif
> >> + while (prim_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t hit_index =
> >> - rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(prim_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> rte_atomic_load_explicit(
> >> @@ -2200,12 +2304,12 @@ __bulk_lookup_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> positions[i] = key_idx - 1;
> >> goto next_key;
> >> }
> >> - prim_hitmask[i] &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> + prim_hitmask &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> }
> >>
> >> - while (sec_hitmask[i]) {
> >> + while (sec_hitmask) {
> >> uint32_t hit_index =
> >> - rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask[i])
> >> + rte_ctz32(sec_hitmask)
> >> >> hitmask_padding;
> >> uint32_t key_idx =
> >> rte_atomic_load_explicit(
> >> @@ -2233,7 +2337,7 @@ __bulk_lookup_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >> positions[i] = key_idx - 1;
> >> goto next_key;
> >> }
> >> - sec_hitmask[i] &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> + sec_hitmask &= ~(1 << (hit_index << hitmask_padding));
> >> }
> >> next_key:
> >> continue;
> >> diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> >> index 8ea793c66e..ed18e1f41e 100644
> >> --- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> >> +++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> >> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ enum rte_hash_sig_compare_function {
> >> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR = 0,
> >> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE,
> >> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON,
> >> + RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SVE,
> >> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NUM
> >> };
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 16:51 [PATCH v2 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2023-10-20 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-02-27 17:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-02-28 10:56 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-02-28 14:48 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-04 13:35 ` Konstantin Ananyev [this message]
2024-03-05 15:36 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-03-11 23:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 3:57 ` fengchengwen
2024-03-12 15:08 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-03-19 10:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-03-19 13:09 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-19 13:25 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-03-19 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-03-20 7:37 ` [EXTERNAL] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2024-04-11 13:32 ` Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-03-12 15:42 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 18:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-04-17 16:08 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] " Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] hash: pack the hitmask for hash in bulk lookup Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] hash: optimize compare signature for NEON Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] test/hash: check bulk lookup of keys after collision Yoan Picchi
2024-04-30 16:27 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] hash: add SVE support for bulk key lookup Yoan Picchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26ede8330c0b4c2cb213cdc7102d4e86@huawei.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harjot.singh@arm.com \
--cc=nathan.brown@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yoan.picchi@arm.com \
--cc=yoan.picchi@foss.arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).