DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anoob <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
Cc: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
	Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Narayana Prasad <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:30:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d536158-7371-614d-a2ee-a3282fda2c65@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211082132.usggk5hfz3xy5usl@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com>

Hi Nelio,


On 12/11/2017 01:51 PM, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> Hi Anoob,
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:10:28PM +0530, Anoob Joseph wrote:
>> HI Nelio,
>>
>>
>> On 08-12-2017 20:10, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:30:03PM +0530, Anoob wrote:
>>>> Hi Nelio,
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [...]
>>>>> +					goto flow_create;
>>>>> +				/* Try Queue. */
>>>>> +				for (i = 0;
>>>>> +				     i < eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; ++i)
>>>>> +					if (eth_dev->data->rx_queues[i])
>>>>> +						break;
>>>> Is the following check correct?
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> For an application, it seems not necessary.  The application knows which
>>> queues are configured in the drivers has it has made the configuration.
>>>
>>> Removing it in the v3.
>> I think you misunderstood me here.
> Indeed, I misunderstood,
>
>> I was talking about the following line.
>>
>> +				if (i != eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues)
>> +					return -1;
>>
>> Shouldn't it be?
>>
>> +				if (i == eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues)
>> +					return -1;
> Yes it should.
>
> Anyway, I don't thing it is necessary to keep this check, from what I
> saw in the application source code, it initialise all Rx queues up to
> nb_rx_queues without leaving any hole.
> According to this, I'll just remove this verification,  is it okay for
> you?
I think you can just use Queue 0 here. So you can get rid of the checks 
etc. For real applications, we should have an entry in SA structure 
which will determine the Queue to be used. Even for RSS, something like 
that would be required.

Thanks,
Anoob

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-11  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-23 15:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-23 15:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-29 12:30   ` Anoob
2017-11-29 12:50     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-11-30 10:46       ` Anoob
2017-11-30 12:28         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-01 15:04           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-01 16:26             ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-04 14:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-11 11:50     ` Radu Nicolau
2017-12-04 14:11   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-07  9:47     ` Anoob
2017-12-07 12:22       ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-08 14:00     ` Anoob
2017-12-08 14:40       ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-08 16:40         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11  8:21           ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-11  9:00             ` Anoob [this message]
2017-12-11 14:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12  7:14       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-11 14:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12 12:43       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 13:44         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-12 14:04           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-12 14:38             ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13  6:41               ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 10:02                 ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13 11:38                   ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 12:53                     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-13 13:53                       ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-13 14:47                         ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-20 16:19                           ` Boris Pismenny
2017-12-21  8:06                             ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-21 10:12                               ` Boris Pismenny
2017-12-21 14:22                                 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-01-05  6:18                                   ` Anoob Joseph
2018-01-09 12:48                                     ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-10  6:21                                       ` Anoob Joseph
2018-01-05  5:52                                 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-18  8:23         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18  9:57           ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-12-14 15:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress " Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15  9:05         ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-15 13:53           ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15 15:39             ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-15 16:53               ` Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-15 17:01                 ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix missing ingress flow attribute Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-18 14:50           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add target queues in flow actions Nelio Laranjeiro
2017-12-19  6:22           ` Anoob Joseph
2017-12-18 10:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress " Nelio Laranjeiro
2018-01-08 16:13           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2018-01-16 16:12           ` Nicolau, Radu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d536158-7371-614d-a2ee-a3282fda2c65@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).