DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: fix bitmask of supported	Tx flags
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:53:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810CD4FA3@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F111017@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 8:11 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: fix bitmask of supported
> Tx flags
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev,
> > Konstantin
> > Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 11:59 AM
> > To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: fix bitmask of
> > supported Tx flags
> >
> > Hi Jingjing,
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wu, Jingjing
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 3:36 AM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
> > >
> > > Add missed flags to bitmask of all supported packet Tx flags.
> > >
> > > CC: konstantin.ananyev@intel.com
> > > Fixes: 7829b8d52be0 ("net/ixgbe: add Tx preparation")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index 36f1c02..8454581 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > > @@ -81,13 +81,28 @@
> > >  #include "ixgbe_rxtx.h"
> > >
> > >  /* Bit Mask to indicate what bits required for building TX context
> > > */
> > > +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
> > >  #define IXGBE_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK (			 \
> > >  		PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT |		 \
> > >  		PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |		 \
> > > +		PKT_TX_IPV4 |			 \
> > >  		PKT_TX_L4_MASK |		 \
> > > +		PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST |		 \
> > >  		PKT_TX_TCP_SEG |		 \
> > >  		PKT_TX_MACSEC |			 \
> > > -		PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM)
> > > +		PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM |		 \
> > > +		PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4)
> > > +#else
> > > +#define IXGBE_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK (			 \
> > > +		PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT |		 \
> > > +		PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |		 \
> > > +		PKT_TX_IPV4 |			 \
> >
> > Wonder why ixgbe doesn't have PKT_TX_IPV6?
> 
> Same question for e1000 and fm10k.
> Also if you decided to go that way, you'll probably need to update
> TX_OFFLOAD_MASK for enic and vmxnet3.
> That's why I still think it would be much less hassle not to include these flags
> (PKT_TX_IPV4 and PKT_TX_IPV6)  into TX_OFFLOAD_MASK at all.
> Konstantin
> 
>
Thanks for pointing that. PKT_TX_IPV6 is missed.
About whether include these flags (PKT_TX_IPV4 and PKT_TX_IPV6)  into TX_OFFLOAD_MASK, I think they should be
Included. Think about one NIC may support IPV4 L4 checksum offload, but not support IPV6? Even I don't know who it is.

Thanks
Jingjing

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-06  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-24 11:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-01-24 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-01-26 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-04  3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-05 10:28     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-06  3:02       ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 10:28         ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-07  2:30           ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 10:26     ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-07  2:30       ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-05 11:59     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-05 12:10       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-06  8:53         ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2017-02-06 12:11           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-07  2:29             ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-08  0:34               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/fm10k: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/i40e: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 13:48       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-07 15:45         ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-07 16:01           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] net/i40e: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 16:27         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-02-08 16:32       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-09  1:13         ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-08 16:46       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-09 14:37         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810CD4FA3@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).