From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:45:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810CD5CA6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f19a12e-8768-a8a1-52b0-9cdcba20fbc7@intel.com>
> > +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IEEE1588
> > +#define I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST #else #define
> > +I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST 0 #endif
> > +
> > #define I40E_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK ( \
> > PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | \
> > PKT_TX_L4_MASK | \
> > @@ -87,7 +93,9 @@
> > PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM | \
> > PKT_TX_TCP_SEG | \
> > PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT | \
> > - PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT)
> > + PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT | \
> > + PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK | \
> > + I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST)
>
> PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST added into I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK, but not into
> PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK (patch 4/4)
>
> Shouldn't PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK be a super set of driver ones. Otherwise
> PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST will be marked as not supported according below
> XOR logic.
>
Yes, you are right. Should I send a new version patch set? Or just update the [4/4]?
Thanks
Jingjing
> >
> > #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \
> > (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK)
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-07 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 11:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-01-24 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-01-26 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-04 3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04 3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04 3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-05 10:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-06 3:02 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 10:28 ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-07 2:30 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 10:26 ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-07 2:30 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-04 3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-05 11:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-05 12:10 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-06 8:53 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 12:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-07 2:29 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-08 0:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-04 3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04 3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/fm10k: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/i40e: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 13:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-07 15:45 ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2017-02-07 16:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-07 3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 5:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 5:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] net/i40e: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 5:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 5:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 5:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 16:27 ` Olivier MATZ
2017-02-08 16:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-09 1:13 ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-08 16:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-09 14:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810CD5CA6@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).