From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: "Akihiko Odaki" <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>,
"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: Do not require processor information
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:10:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR08MB70801A9B86FB53B781DE4EA59E639@AS8PR08MB7080.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a88e7efb-57e7-9297-fee6-ad2271269de1@daynix.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 9:40 AM
> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>;
> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: Do not require processor information
>
> On 2023/04/17 16:41, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 8:42 PM
> >> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Bruce Richardson
> >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: Do not require processor information
> >>
> >> DPDK can be built even without exact processor information for x86
> >> and ppc so allow to build for Arm even if we don't know the targeted processor is
> unknown.
> >
> > Hi Akihiko,
> >
> > The design idea was to require an explicit generic build.
> > Default/native build doesn't fall back to generic build when SoC info is not on the list.
> > So the user has less chance to generate a suboptimal binary by accident.
>
> Hi,
>
> It is true that the suboptimal binary can result, but the rationale here is that we
> tolerate that for x86 and ppc so it should not really matter for Arm too. On x86 and ppc
> you don't need to modify meson.build just to run dts on a development machine.
What modification do you need for a development machine?
I suppose "meson setup build -Dplatform=generic" will generate a binary that can run
on your development machine.
>
> Regards,
> Akihiko Odaki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-14 12:41 [PATCH 0/2] Enable generic Arm build Akihiko Odaki
2023-04-14 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: Do not require processor information Akihiko Odaki
2023-04-17 7:41 ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-04-20 1:40 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-04-20 7:10 ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2023-04-20 7:12 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-05-04 7:47 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-05-04 9:43 ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-05-04 15:08 ` Akihiko Odaki
2023-05-29 7:37 ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-04-14 12:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] config/arm: Enable NUMA for generic Arm build Akihiko Odaki
2023-04-20 7:20 ` Ruifeng Wang
2023-04-22 5:26 ` Akihiko Odaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AS8PR08MB70801A9B86FB53B781DE4EA59E639@AS8PR08MB7080.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).