DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier_huwei@163.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	xavier.huwei@huawei.com, lihuisong@huawei.com,
	Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: update Rx RSS HASH offload when setting MQ RSS
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:35:31 +0100
Message-ID: <02fd6a3c-3810-fbb6-f51d-7c29fc26bfed@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <689cd203-fa42-bf2a-6821-6065cb760b0b@163.com>

On 9/23/2020 8:04 AM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> Hi, Ferruh Yigit
> On 2020/9/23 0:21, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 9/8/2020 3:16 AM, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>> Currently, when starting testpmd application without '--disable-rss' and
>>> the number of Rx queue configured is greater than 1, ETH_MQ_RX_RSS flag
>>> is set in port->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode in testpmd application, and
>>> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH flag is set in rx_offloads
>>> (dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads) according to the ETH_MQ_RX_RSS
>>> flag of rxmode.mq_mode in PMD drivers.
>>> However, DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH is not set to rx_offloads maintained
>>> in testpmd application, this will cause the inconsistent problem that
>>> rx_offloads is different for testpmd and PMD drivers.
>> Yes for DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH, application rx_offload config and PMD 
>> one diverges, for *some* PMDs.
>> This is done to have the backward compatibility of the PMD behavior.
>> The PMDs that would like to write the provide the calculated hash 
>> value back, overwrites the offload config to enable 
>> 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH'. And does more work than user requested, 
>> this shouldn't have any side affect.
>> Some doesn't provide the hash unless user explicitly requests it.
>> Applications shouldn't set it blindly, at least first check if PMD 
>> supports it but even that case, unless it is needed I think HASH 
>> offload shouldn't be requested by default.
> OK, we are going to do modification to add check if PMD support 
> DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH before setting it as below:
>   @@ -3356,11 +3356,13 @@ init_port_config(void)
>             }
>             if (port->dcb_flag == 0) {
>                if (port->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf != 0) {
>                     port->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode =
>                         (enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode)
>                             (rx_mq_mode & ETH_MQ_RX_RSS);
>             if (port->dev_info.rx_offload_capa &
>                DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH)
>               port->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads |=
>                          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH;
>               } else
>                     port->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_NONE;
>             }

Hi Xavier,

The capability check is correct thing to do, but even in that case I am 
not sure if we should set the config by default.

The reason to extract the 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_RSS_HASH' offload is to gain 
performance for some NICs, enabling it by default defeats the purpose.

The offload should be enabled when application needs the provided hash 

I can see you are trying to remove the divergence between PMD and 
application config, this can be fixed when all PMDs take this user 
offload request into account instead of overwriting, but for some PMDs 
it is cheaper to provide the hash value instead of checks, so this 
divergence is not easy to address.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-23  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-08  2:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] updates for testpmd Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-08  2:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: update Rx RSS HASH offload when setting MQ RSS Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-22 16:21   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-23  7:04     ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-23  9:35       ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-09-28 12:27         ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-08  2:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: retain original FDIR mode when configuring DCB Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-22  5:15   ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-09-23  7:14     ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-24  2:41       ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
2020-09-23  7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: update Rx RSS HASH offload when setting MQ RSS Wei Hu (Xavier)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02fd6a3c-3810-fbb6-f51d-7c29fc26bfed@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=xavier.huwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=xavier_huwei@163.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git