From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"Wang, ShougangX" <shougangx.wang@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Wang, ShougangX" <shougangx.wang@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix incorrect hash look up table
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 12:53:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061154864F86@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB0017E2387CBB71123F8F74DFE5760@BN6PR11MB0017.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Yang, Qiming
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 9:57 AM
> To: Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.wang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang,
> ShougangX <shougangx.wang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix incorrect hash look up table
>
> I don't understand why you add new function and new function mostly do the
> same thing.
> Why don't add fix in original code.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Shougang Wang
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 16:16
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Guo, Jia
> > <jia.guo@intel.com>; Wang, ShougangX <shougangx.wang@intel.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix incorrect hash look up
> > table
> >
> > The hash look up table (LUT) is managed by global register but it is
> > not initialized when RSS is disabled. Once user wants to enable RSS
> > during runtime, the LUT will not be initialized.
> > This patch fixes the issue by initializing the LUT whether RSS enabled or not.
> >
> > Fixes: feaae285b342 ("net/i40e: support hash configuration in RSS
> > flow")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shougang Wang <shougangx.wang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > -Updated the time of initializing the look up table
> > ---
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 85
> > ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 05d5f2861..e35590d96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -8984,42 +8984,7 @@ i40e_pf_calc_configured_queues_num(struct
> > i40e_pf *pf) static int i40e_pf_config_rss(struct i40e_pf *pf) {
> > - struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > struct rte_eth_rss_conf rss_conf;
> > - uint32_t i, lut = 0;
> > - uint16_t j, num;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * If both VMDQ and RSS enabled, not all of PF queues are
> > configured.
> > - * It's necessary to calculate the actual PF queues that are configured.
> > - */
> > - if (pf->dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode &
> > ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_FLAG)
> > - num = i40e_pf_calc_configured_queues_num(pf);
> > - else
> > - num = pf->dev_data->nb_rx_queues;
> > -
> > - num = RTE_MIN(num, I40E_MAX_Q_PER_TC);
> > - PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "Max of contiguous %u PF queues are
> > configured",
> > - num);
> > -
> > - if (num == 0) {
> > - PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> > - "No PF queues are configured to enable RSS for port
> > %u",
> > - pf->dev_data->port_id);
> > - return -ENOTSUP;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (pf->adapter->rss_reta_updated == 0) {
> > - for (i = 0, j = 0; i < hw->func_caps.rss_table_size; i++, j++) {
> > - if (j == num)
> > - j = 0;
> > - lut = (lut << 8) | (j & ((0x1 <<
> > - hw->func_caps.rss_table_entry_width) - 1));
> > - if ((i & 3) == 3)
> > - I40E_WRITE_REG(hw, I40E_PFQF_HLUT(i >>
> > 2),
> > - rte_bswap32(lut));
> > - }
> > - }
> >
> > rss_conf = pf->dev_data->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf;
> > if ((rss_conf.rss_hf & pf->adapter->flow_types_mask) == 0) { @@ -
> > 9195,12 +9160,60 @@ i40e_tunnel_filter_handle(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Initialize the hash look up table */ static int
> > +i40e_pf_init_rss_lut(struct i40e_pf *pf) {
> > + struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_PF_TO_HW(pf);
> > + uint32_t lut = 0;
> > + uint16_t j, num;
> > + uint32_t i;
> > +
> > + /* If both VMDQ and RSS enabled, not all of PF queues are
> > configured.
> > + * It's necessary to calculate the actual PF queues that are configured.
> > + */
> > + if (pf->dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode &
> > ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_FLAG)
> > + num = i40e_pf_calc_configured_queues_num(pf);
> > + else
> > + num = pf->dev_data->nb_rx_queues;
> > +
> > + num = RTE_MIN(num, I40E_MAX_Q_PER_TC);
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "Max of contiguous %u PF queues are
> > configured",
> > + num);
> > +
> > + if (num == 0) {
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> > + "No PF queues are configured to enable RSS for port
> > %u",
> > + pf->dev_data->port_id);
> > + return -ENOTSUP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pf->adapter->rss_reta_updated == 0) {
> > + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < hw->func_caps.rss_table_size; i++, j++) {
> > + if (j == num)
> > + j = 0;
> > + lut = (lut << 8) | (j & ((0x1 <<
> > + hw->func_caps.rss_table_entry_width) - 1));
> > + if ((i & 3) == 3)
> > + I40E_WRITE_REG(hw, I40E_PFQF_HLUT(i >>
> > 2),
> > + rte_bswap32(lut));
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int
> > i40e_pf_config_mq_rx(struct i40e_pf *pf) {
> > - int ret = 0;
> > + int ret;
> > enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode mq_mode = pf->dev_data-
> > >dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode;
> >
> > + /* Initialize hash look up table */
> > + ret = i40e_pf_init_rss_lut(pf);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > /* RSS setup */
> > if (mq_mode & ETH_MQ_RX_RSS_FLAG)
I agree with Qiming, if we move this check into i40e_pf_config_rss, dose that looks we don't need to create a new function?
> > ret = i40e_pf_config_rss(pf);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 6:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-15 9:07 ` Chen, BoX C
2020-07-18 4:07 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-21 5:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-21 6:41 ` Xie, WeiX
2020-07-22 5:50 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-22 6:39 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-22 5:31 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-07-22 6:20 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-22 8:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-23 1:57 ` Yang, Qiming
2020-07-23 12:53 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2020-07-24 2:34 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-24 2:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-24 3:57 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-24 4:49 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-24 5:07 ` Yang, Qiming
2020-07-24 5:42 ` Wang, ShougangX
2020-07-24 8:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-24 9:00 ` Xie, WeiX
2020-07-24 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Shougang Wang
2020-07-24 9:54 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-24 9:58 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061154864F86@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=shougangx.wang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).