DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ola Liljedahl <Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 14:21:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <085B3F9C-FCB5-47C9-9FB3-B56211FD5FED@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772580102FE2951@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>



On 05/10/2018, 15:45, "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:

    We all know that 32bit load/store on cpu we support - are atomic.
Well, not necessarily true for unaligned loads and stores. But the "problem" here is that we are not directly generating 32-bit load and store instructions (that would require inline assembly), we are performing C-level reads and writes and trust the compiler to generate the machine instructions.

    If it wouldn't be the case - DPDK would be broken in dozen places.
And maybe it is, if you compile for a new architecture or with a new compiler (which are getting more and more aggressive with regards to utilising e.g. undefined behavior in order to optimise the generated code).

    So what the point to pretend that "it might be not atomic" if we do know for sure that it is?
Any argument that includes the words "for sure" is surely suspect.

    I do understand that you want to use atomic_load(relaxed) here for consistency,
    and to conform with C11 mem-model and I don't see any harm in that.
    But argument that we shouldn't assume 32bit load/store ops as atomic sounds a bit flaky to me.
    Konstantin
I prefer to declare intent and requirements to the compiler, not to depend on assumptions even if I can be reasonably sure my assumptions are correct right here right now. Compilers will find new ways to break non-compliant code if that means it can improve the execution time of compliant code.

Someone may modify the code or follow the model for some similar thing but change that 32-bit variable to a 64-bit variable. Now for a 32-bit target, the plain C read from a volatile 64-bit variable will not be atomic but there will be no warning from the compiler, it will happily generate a sequence of non-atomic loads. If you instead use __atomic_load_n() to read the variable, you would get a compiler or linker error (unless you link with -latomic which will actually provide an atomic load, e.g. by using a lock to protect the access).



  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-05 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 131+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-06  1:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ring: fix c11 memory ordering issue Gavin Hu
2018-08-06  9:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-08-08  1:39   ` Gavin Hu
2018-08-07  3:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gavin Hu
2018-08-07  5:56   ` He, Jia
2018-08-07  7:56     ` Gavin Hu
2018-08-08  3:07       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-08  7:23         ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-17  7:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] app/testpmd: show errno along with flow API errors Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  7:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/i40e: remove invalid comment Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  8:25       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17  7:47     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: add cross compile part for sample applications Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  9:48       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-17 10:28         ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17 10:34           ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-17 10:55             ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17 10:49       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-17 10:53         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-18 11:00           ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-19  0:33           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  8:11     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] bus/fslmc: fix undefined reference of memsegs Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  8:11       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] ring: read tail using atomic load Gavin Hu
2018-09-20  6:41         ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-25  9:26           ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-17  8:11       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  8:11       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-27 14:21         ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-17  8:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load Gavin Hu
2018-09-17  8:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-09-26  9:29       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-26  9:59         ` Justin He
2018-09-29 10:57       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-17  6:29       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Gavin Hu
2018-10-17  6:29         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-17  6:35         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-27 14:39           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-27 15:00             ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-27 15:13               ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-27 15:34                 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-27 15:48                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29  2:51                   ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-29  2:57                   ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-29 10:16                     ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-29 10:47                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-29 11:10                         ` Jerin Jacob
2018-11-03 20:12                 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-05 21:51                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-06 11:03                     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-10-31  3:35         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] rte ring c11 bug fix and optimization Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 10:26           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ring library with c11 memory model " Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 16:58             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-01  9:53             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-11-01  9:53             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-11-01 17:26               ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-02  0:53                 ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-02  4:30                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-02  7:15                     ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-02  9:36                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-02 11:23                         ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-31 10:26           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-10-31 22:07             ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-11-01  9:56               ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-31 10:26           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-31  3:35         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-10-31  3:35         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-10-31  9:36           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-31 10:27             ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-01  9:53         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ring library with c11 memory model bug fix and optimization Gavin Hu
2018-11-02 11:21           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Gavin Hu
2018-11-02 11:21           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ring: synchronize the load and store of the tail Gavin Hu
2018-11-05  9:30             ` Olivier Matz
2018-11-02 11:21           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] ring: move the atomic load of head above the loop Gavin Hu
2018-11-02 11:43             ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-03  1:19               ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-03  9:34                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-11-05 13:17                   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-05 13:41                     ` Jerin Jacob
2018-11-05  9:44                 ` [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
2018-11-05 13:36                   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-17  8:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] " Gavin Hu
2018-09-26  9:29       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-26 10:06         ` Justin He
2018-09-29  7:19           ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-29 10:59       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-09-26  9:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-09-26 10:09       ` Justin He
2018-09-29 10:48     ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-05  0:47       ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-05  8:21         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-10-05 11:15           ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 11:36             ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 13:44               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-10-05 14:21                 ` Ola Liljedahl [this message]
2018-10-05 15:11                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-05 17:07                   ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-05 18:05                     ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 20:06                       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-05 20:17                         ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-05 20:29                           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-05 20:34                             ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-06  7:41                               ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-06 19:44                                 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-06 19:59                                   ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-07  4:02                                   ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-07 20:11                                     ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-07 20:44                                     ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08  6:06                                       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08  9:22                                         ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 10:00                                           ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 10:25                                             ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 10:33                                               ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-08 10:39                                                 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 10:41                                                   ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-08 10:49                                                 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-10  6:28                                                   ` Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
2018-10-10 19:26                                                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-08 10:46                                               ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 11:21                                                 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 11:50                                                   ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 11:59                                                     ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 12:05                                                       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 12:20                                                         ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-08 12:30                                                           ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-09  8:53                                                             ` Olivier Matz
2018-10-09  3:16                                             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-08 14:43                                           ` Bruce Richardson
2018-10-08 14:46                                             ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08 15:45                                               ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-08  5:27                               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-10-08 10:01                                 ` Ola Liljedahl
2018-10-27 14:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=085B3F9C-FCB5-47C9-9FB3-B56211FD5FED@arm.com \
    --to=ola.liljedahl@arm.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).