DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Kantecki, Tomasz" <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	 "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:23:01 +0800
Message-ID: <0d828361-15ae-6bb4-4d70-f25543b37f90@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB289030B612C25CDB01025AD5EF419@DM6PR11MB2890.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



在 2021/4/27 19:51, Iremonger, Bernard 写道:
> Hi Min,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 10:41 AM
>> To: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Iremonger,
>> Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; Kantecki, Tomasz
>> <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Burakov, Anatoly
>> <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; david.marchand@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] examples/flow_classify: fix check of
>> port and core
>>
>> 20/04/2021 04:26, Min Hu (Connor):
>>> 2021/4/20 9:08, Thomas Monjalon:
>>>> 27/03/2021 08:40, Min Hu (Connor):
>>>>> fix check of port and core in flow_classify example.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: bab16ddaf2c1 ("examples/flow_classify: add sample
>>>>> application")
>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(port)
>>>>> -		if (rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) > 0 &&
>>>>> +		if (rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) >= 0 &&
> 
> This fix works (I have tested it on my system)
> However a cleaner fix would be to drop the above line and add the if on the next line instead (also tested on my system).
> 
Hi, 'rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port)' may return -1,  we should avoid this
situation.

> If (rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) != (int)rte_socket_id())
> 
>>>>>    			rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) != (int)rte_socket_id())
>> {
>>>>>    			printf("\n\n");
>>>>>    			printf("WARNING: port %u is on remote NUMA
>> node\n",
>>>>
>>>> Please explain which case is broken and why.
>>>> If I understand well, we don't detect remote NUMA if not running on first
>> socket.
>>>>
>>> Hi, the code is this:
>>>
>> **********************************************************
>> ***************
>>> 	/*
>>> 	 * Check that the port is on the same NUMA node as the polling
>> thread
>>> 	 * for best performance.
>>> 	 */
>>> 	RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(port)
>>> 		if (rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) > 0 &&
>>> 			rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port) != (int)rte_socket_id())
>> {
>>> 			printf("\n\n");
>>> 			printf("WARNING: port %u is on remote NUMA
>> node\n",
>>> 			       port);
>>> 			printf("to polling thread.\n");
>>> 			printf("Performance will not be optimal.\n");
>>> 		}
>>> 	printf("\nCore %u forwarding packets. ", rte_lcore_id());
>>> 	printf("[Ctrl+C to quit]\n");
>>>
>> **********************************************************
>> ************
>>> ***
>>>
>>> According to the comments and logging, the author just hope user to
>>> use the core and device which are in the same numa node for optimal
>>> performance. If not, A warning gives out.
>>>
>>> For example in flow_classify:
>>> ./build/flow_classify -w 0000:7d:00.1  -l 93
>>> Here:
>>> 0000:7d:00.1 is on numa node 0.
>>> core 93  is on numa node 3.
>>>
>>> the two are not in same numa node, but no warning gives out in old codes.
>>>
>>> Well, using this patch, we can get the waring.
>>
>> You need to explain which case was broken in the commit log.
>> Thanks
>>
>>
> Regards,
> 
> Bernard.
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-27  7:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-03-27  7:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] examples/flow_classify: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20  1:08   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-20  2:26     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20  9:40       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-27 11:51         ` Iremonger, Bernard
2021-04-27 12:23           ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]
2021-04-27 13:06             ` Iremonger, Bernard
2021-04-28  9:26               ` Iremonger, Bernard
2021-03-27  7:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] examples/l2fwd-cat: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-03-27  7:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/skeleton: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-10  9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-19  7:44   ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21  7:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21  7:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/flow_classify: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-28 13:29     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2021-04-29  0:51       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21  7:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l2fwd-cat: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21  7:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/skeleton: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  0:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  0:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] examples/flow_classify: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  9:07     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2021-04-29  9:37       ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29 11:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-29 12:15           ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  0:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] examples/l2fwd-cat: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-29  0:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] examples/skeleton: " Min Hu (Connor)
2021-05-12 16:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-12 19:16     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0d828361-15ae-6bb4-4d70-f25543b37f90@huawei.com \
    --to=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=tomasz.kantecki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git