DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Alex Markuze (alex@weka.io)" <alex@weka.io>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:07:57 +0000
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EDA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EC5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 5:04 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Subject: FW: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
> 
> 
> 
> From: Alex Markuze [mailto:alex@weka.io]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:27 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
> 
> I was setting both ip and udp scum fields to 0. PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM == PKT_TX_L4_MASK = 0x6000.
> 
> I was not aware of the get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
> And I'm quite frankly surprised the HW doesn't already do this. Farther more I don't remember kernel drivers messing with
> L3 Headers(bnx2x/mlx4). Is this true for all PMDs that do scum offloads?

I suppose it depends on HW implementation.
All Intel NICs I am aware about (e1000, ixgbe, i40e) expect that SW provides the pseudo IP header checksum in the L4 header.
Not sure what is the story with NICs from other manufactures.

> 
> I will give it a try now.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alex Markuze
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:05 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] UDP Checksum
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm seeing "UDP: bad checksum." messages(dmesg) for packets sent by my dpdk
> > app to a socket on a remote machine.
> > Looking at the packets the scum value is set, its just not what wireshark
> > expects.
> >
> > When sending I'm setting these fields in the egress packets.
> >
> >         pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l2_len = sizeof(struct ether_hdr);
> >
> >         pkt->pkt.vlan_macip.f.l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
> >
> >         pkt->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK);
> > //PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
> >
> >
> > I'm working with a 82599 VF.
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts? I'm not sure what else to check.
> As I remember, you have to setup  IPV4 header checksum to 0 and
> calculate and setup pseudo-header checksum for UDP.
> From app/test-pmd/csumonly.c:
> ...
> if (pkt_ol_flags & (PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR | PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV4_HDR)) {
> 
>                         /* Do not support ipv4 option field */
>                         l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr) ;
> 
>                         ...
> 
>                         /* Do not delete, this is required by HW*/
>                         ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
> 
>                        ...
> 
>                       if (l4_proto == IPPROTO_UDP) {
>                                 udp_hdr = (struct udp_hdr*) (rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb,
>                                                 unsigned char *) + l2_len + l3_len);
>                                 if (tx_ol_flags & 0x2) {
>                                         /* HW Offload */
>                                         ol_flags |= PKT_TX_UDP_CKSUM;
>                                         if (ipv4_tunnel)
>                                                 udp_hdr->dgram_cksum = 0;
>                                         else
>                                                 /* Pseudo header sum need be set properly */
>                                                 udp_hdr->dgram_cksum =
>                                                         get_ipv4_psd_sum(ipv4_hdr);
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-06 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-06 16:05 Alex Markuze
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-06 16:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-06 16:26   ` Alex Markuze
     [not found]     ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EC5@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2014-11-06 17:07       ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-09-24 15:11 [dpdk-dev] udp checksum Khoussi, Siham (IntlAssoc)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213A2EDA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=alex@weka.io \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git