From: Subendu Santra <subendu@arista.com>
To: stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, maryam.tahhan@intel.com,
reshma.pattan@intel.com, Sriram Rajagopalan <sriramr@arista.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] app/proc-info: provide way to request info on owned ports
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:04:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3710E2E2-5CCC-41F3-A12A-E8B6A884CC40@arista.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 887 bytes --]
Hi Stephen,
We were going through the patch set: https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20200715212228.28010-7-stephen@networkplumber.org/ and hoping to get clarification on the behaviour if post mask is not specified in the input to `dpdk-proc-info` tool.
Specifically, In PATCH v3 6/7, we see this:
+ /* If no port mask was specified, one will be provided */
+ if (enabled_port_mask == 0) {
+ RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i) {
+ enabled_port_mask |= 1u << i;
However, in PATCH v4 8/8, we see this:
+ /* If no port mask was specified, then show non-owned ports */
+ if (enabled_port_mask == 0) {
+ RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i)
+ enabled_port_mask = 1ul << i;
+ }
Was there any specific reason to show just the last non-owned port in case the port mask was not specified?
Should we show all non-owned ports in case the user doesn’t specify any port mask?
Regards,
Subendu.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2119 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-24 5:34 Subendu Santra [this message]
2022-05-03 5:29 ` Subendu Santra
2022-05-03 8:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-04 17:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-10 9:09 ` Subendu Santra
2022-05-10 20:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-11 7:36 ` Subendu Santra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-06 19:37 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] proc-info enhancements Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-15 21:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] app/proc-info enhancments Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-15 21:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] app/proc-info: provide way to request info on owned ports Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-17 15:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-21 17:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-21 17:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-21 17:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3710E2E2-5CCC-41F3-A12A-E8B6A884CC40@arista.com \
--to=subendu@arista.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=maryam.tahhan@intel.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=sriramr@arista.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).