From: "Kobylinski, MichalX" <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "viktorin@rehivetech.com" <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:27:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F02C6E3@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455280123-9311-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:29 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: viktorin@rehivetech.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
>
> - This patch enables lpm for ARM
> - Used architecture agnostic xmm_t to represent 128 bit SIMD variable in
> rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition
> - Tested on Juno and Thunderx boards
> - Tested and verified the changes with following DPDK unit test cases
> --lpm_autotest
> --lpm6_autotest
> v1..v2
> - make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic
> - vect_* abstraction scope reduce to only app/test as this abstraction used only
> to load/store and set vectors in test application which is the consumer of
> rte_lpm_lookupx4 like API
> - support for armv7 apart from armv8
> - taken changes from Jianbo's lpm patches
>
> v2..v3
> - add Acked-by for 0001-lpm-make-rte_lpm_lookupx4-API-definition-
> architectur.patch
> - re-based to DPDK 2.2
> -- fixed the conflict in config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc and
> MAINTAINERS file
>
> v3..v4
> -Instead of defaulting the lpm implementation to SSE, SSE implementation kept
> under RTE_ARCH_X86 conditional compilation check as suggested by Thomas
>
> Jerin Jacob (3):
> lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic
> lpm: add support for NEON
> maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and
> lpm
>
> MAINTAINERS | 3 +
> app/test/test_lpm.c | 21 ++--
> app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h | 67 +++++++++++++
> config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc | 3 -
> config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc | 3 -
> lib/librte_lpm/Makefile | 6 ++
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 99 ++-----------------
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h create mode 100644 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h
> create mode 100644 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h
>
> --
> 2.1.0
Hi Jerin,
Are you planning increase next_hop field for ARM? I extended next_hop field from 8 bits to 24 bits and created structure to configure LPM for x86.
Please look at my patchset with proposal increase next_hop field and structure to configure.
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/
Best Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 17:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Jerin Jacob
2015-11-30 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal: introduce rte_vect_* abstractions Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:51 ` Jerin Jacob
2015-11-30 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:56 ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 15:00 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-30 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:57 ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-04 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Jerin Jacob
2015-12-04 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2015-12-07 6:15 ` Jianbo Liu
2015-12-07 6:57 ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-07 14:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-12-04 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2015-12-04 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2016-01-29 4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-01-29 4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2016-01-29 4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-02-11 11:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-12 6:47 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 8:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-29 4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2016-02-08 9:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2016-03-01 17:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 6:28 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-03-01 17:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 6:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2016-03-01 17:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 6:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-16 13:27 ` Kobylinski, MichalX [this message]
2016-02-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-02-18 10:26 ` Kobylinski, MichalX
2016-02-19 0:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11 3:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11 3:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11 3:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11 3:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] Maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11 14:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F02C6E3@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=michalx.kobylinski@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).