DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Adrien Mazarguil" <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ethdev: add port speed capability bitmap
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:24:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC358AF3C3@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150915100443.GA4924@6wind.com>

Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com] on 15. september 2015 12:05:

> A given link cannot be simultaneously at 10 Gbps and 1 Gbps right? Using a bit-field for the current link speed is confusing at best. Output values do not need to be included in the unified API, they are never converted back into enum values.

A given link can only use one speed at any given time, correct. However, other link properties must be output too, such as link status, duplex status, auto negotiation status, flow control status, media status, etc..  Using a bitfield provides all this information in an atomic operation.

> I'm stressing again the fact that doing so would require a changes in all applications that use the current speed and in PMDs for no good reason.

Correct, it requires a lot of changes in all the PMDs. I think a good PHY API with the appropriate features is a good reason. If there is no consensus to put in the work to update the PHY API and PMDs accordingly, just leave it at its former state.


I recently saw an interesting presentation about TCP optimization, and the last slide has a very good point. It says (slightly paraphrased): "You can't sell just the traffic handling, you need the support infrastructure for O&M, such as CLI, Web UI, Historical counter database, SNMP, RADIUS, Analytics and so on." So related to our PHY API discussion, I would add that proper handling of the physical interfaces is one of those things that just need to be in order when you sell network appliances.


Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
- Morten Brørup

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-15 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-11 23:45 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH " Marc Sune
2015-05-11 23:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/2] Added ETH_SPEED_CAP bitmap in rte_eth_dev_info Marc Sune
2015-05-25 17:46   ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-26  8:41     ` Marc Sune
2015-05-26 15:03   ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-26 15:09     ` Marc Sune
2015-05-11 23:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/2] Filling speed capability bitmaps in the PMDs Marc Sune
2015-05-25 16:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ethdev: add port speed capability bitmap Marc Sune
2015-05-26 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Marc Sune
2015-05-26 19:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] Added ETH_SPEED_CAP bitmap in rte_eth_dev_info Marc Sune
2015-05-27  4:02     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-27  9:15       ` Marc Sune
2015-05-29 18:23         ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-08  8:50           ` Marc Sune
2015-06-11  9:08             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-06-11 14:35               ` Marc Sune
2015-05-26 19:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Filling speed capability bitmaps in the PMDs Marc Sune
2015-05-26 21:20     ` Igor Ryzhov
2015-05-27  8:59       ` Marc Sune
2015-08-28 23:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev: add port speed capability bitmap Marc Sune
2015-08-28 23:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] Added ETH_SPEED_ bitmap in rte_eth_dev_info Marc Sune
2015-08-28 23:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] Filling speed capability bitmaps in the PMDs Marc Sune
2015-08-29  0:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ethdev: add port speed capability bitmap Marc Sune
2015-08-29  0:16       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] Added ETH_SPEED_ bitmap in rte_eth_dev_info Marc Sune
2015-08-29  0:16       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] Filling speed capability bitmaps in the PMDs Marc Sune
2015-09-07 20:52       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ethdev: add port speed capability bitmap Marc Sune
2015-09-08 10:03         ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2015-09-08 20:26           ` Marc Sune
2015-09-09 13:10           ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2015-09-09 13:33             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-13 19:14               ` Marc Sune
2015-09-13 21:18                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-14 10:02                   ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2015-09-14 10:52                   ` Morten Brørup
2015-09-14 21:33                     ` Marc Sune
2015-09-14 22:50                       ` Morten Brørup
2015-09-15  8:25                         ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2015-09-15  8:48                           ` Marc Sune
2015-09-15  9:39                             ` Morten Brørup
2015-09-15 10:04                             ` Adrien Mazarguil
2015-09-15 10:24                               ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2015-09-15 21:20                               ` Marc Sune
2015-09-16 14:41                                 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2015-09-15  7:05                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-15  7:33                         ` Morten Brørup
2015-09-15  9:06                       ` Morten Brørup
2015-10-04 21:12       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] ethdev: add speed capabilities and refactor link API Marc Sune
2015-10-04 21:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] ethdev: Added ETH_SPEED_CAP bitmap for ports Marc Sune
2015-10-04 21:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] ethdev: Fill speed capability bitmaps in the PMDs Marc Sune
2015-10-04 21:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] ethdev: redesign link speed config API Marc Sune
2015-10-05 10:59           ` Neil Horman
2015-10-07 13:31             ` Marc Sune
2015-10-06 13:48           ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2015-10-07 13:37             ` Marc Sune
2016-01-28 17:33           ` Harish Patil
2016-02-02  2:20             ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-02-02 22:30               ` Marc
2016-02-11 15:27                 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2016-02-11 23:23                   ` Marc
2015-10-04 21:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] doc: update with link changes Marc Sune
2015-10-04 21:21         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] ethdev: add speed capabilities and refactor link API Marc Sune

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC358AF3C3@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).