From: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
To: "Xu, Rosen" <rosen.xu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/flow_filtering: add rte_fdir_conf initialization
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 05:58:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR05MB34255A07CD5BA94D85D2666FDB590@AM4PR05MB3425.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E78D399C70DA940A335608C6ED296D73A13DA82@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi,
PSB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Rosen [mailto:rosen.xu@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 8:27 AM
> To: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/flow_filtering: add rte_fdir_conf
> initialization
>
> Hi Ori,
>
> examples/flow_filtering sample app fails on i40e [1] because i40e requires
> explicit FDIR configuration.
>
> But rte_flow in and hardware independent ways of describing flow-action, it
> shouldn't require specific config options for specific hardware.
>
I don't understand why using rte flow require the use of fdir.
it doesn't make sense to me, that new API will need old one.
> Is there any chance driver select the FDIR config automatically based on
> rte_flow rule, unless explicitly a FDIR config set by user?
I don't know how the i40e driver is implemented but I know
that Mellanox convert the other way around, if fdir is given it is
converted to rte_flow.
>
> [1]
> Flow can't be created 1 message: Check the mode in fdir_conf.
> EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ori Kam [mailto:orika@mellanox.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 13:17
> > To: Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> > <orika@mellanox.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/flow_filtering: add
> rte_fdir_conf
> > initialization
> >
> > Hi Rosen,
> >
> > Why do the fdir_conf must be initialized?
> >
> > What is the issue you are seeing?
> >
> > Best,
> > Ori
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Rosen Xu
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:10 AM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: rosen.xu@intel.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com; Ori Kam
> > > <orika@mellanox.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/flow_filtering: add rte_fdir_conf
> > > initialization
> > >
> > > Rte_fdir_conf of rte_eth_conf should be initialized before port
> > > initialization.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4a3ef59a10c8 ("examples/flow_filtering: add simple demo of flow
> > > API")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Xu <rosen.xu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > examples/flow_filtering/main.c | 6 ++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/examples/flow_filtering/main.c
> > > b/examples/flow_filtering/main.c index f595034..aa03e23 100644
> > > --- a/examples/flow_filtering/main.c
> > > +++ b/examples/flow_filtering/main.c
> > > @@ -132,6 +132,12 @@
> > > DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM |
> > > DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO,
> > > },
> > > + .fdir_conf = {
> > > + .mode = RTE_FDIR_MODE_PERFECT,
> > > + .pballoc = RTE_FDIR_PBALLOC_64K,
> > > + .status = RTE_FDIR_REPORT_STATUS,
> > > + .drop_queue = 127,
> > > + },
> > > };
> > > struct rte_eth_txconf txq_conf;
> > > struct rte_eth_rxconf rxq_conf;
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-12 2:09 Rosen Xu
2018-07-12 5:17 ` Ori Kam
2018-07-12 5:26 ` Xu, Rosen
2018-07-12 5:58 ` Ori Kam [this message]
2018-07-12 6:22 ` Xu, Rosen
2018-07-17 5:15 ` Ori Kam
2018-07-17 9:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-17 13:04 ` Ori Kam
2018-07-17 15:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-21 7:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Rosen Xu
2018-07-22 6:33 ` Ori Kam
2018-07-22 10:37 ` Xu, Rosen
2018-07-22 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Rosen Xu
2018-07-23 20:32 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-26 17:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-31 12:55 ` Xu, Rosen
2018-07-31 12:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Rosen Xu
2018-08-05 20:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM4PR05MB34255A07CD5BA94D85D2666FDB590@AM4PR05MB3425.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=rosen.xu@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).