From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:29:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB44516D8F1DA0AD688B285831F8190@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <667e9f79-6461-0d45-a60a-480e452a9277@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:06 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters
>
>
> On 10/23/20 4:42 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Adding explicit check in ut that the stats counters have the expect
> > values. Was missing for coverage.
>
> missing from coverage
>
> ?
This was causing code coverage gap.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Aidan Goddard <aidan.goddard@accelercomm.com>
> > Acked-by: Dave Burley <dave.burley@accelercomm.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index 3554a77..b62848e 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -4840,6 +4840,23 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> > (double)(time_st.deq_max_time * 1000000) /
> > rte_get_tsc_hz());
> >
> > + struct rte_bbdev_stats stats = {0};
> Other calls to get_bbdev_queue_stats do not initialize stats and likely should
> > + get_bbdev_queue_stats(ad->dev_id, queue_id, &stats);
> Should check the return here.
> > + if (op_type != RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC) {
>
> This logic seems off.
>
> Do you mean to check only enc stats with an enc op ?
>
> Similar for dec.
No that is intentional. That check would not be relavent for the LDPC_DEC tests as this may run more operations for the sake of HARQ preloading/retrieve.
>
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.enqueued_count !=
> num_to_process,
> > + "Mismatch in enqueue count %10"PRIu64"
> %d",
> > + stats.enqueued_count, num_to_process);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.dequeued_count !=
> num_to_process,
> > + "Mismatch in dequeue count %10"PRIu64"
> %d",
> > + stats.dequeued_count, num_to_process);
> > + }
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.enqueue_err_count != 0,
> > + "Enqueue count Error %10"PRIu64"",
> > + stats.enqueue_err_count);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(stats.dequeue_err_count != 0,
> > + "Dequeue count Error (%10"PRIu64"",
> > + stats.dequeue_err_count);
> > +
> > return TEST_SUCCESS;
> > #endif
> > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-23 23:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] BBDEV test updates Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs validation Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 12:55 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 17:30 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:37 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:05 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:29 ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2020-10-28 20:31 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] app/bbdev: include explicit HARQ preloading Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:31 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:50 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:33 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] app/bbdev: define wait for offload Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:33 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:04 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:24 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] app/bbdev: skip bler ut when compression is used Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:35 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] app/bbdev: reduce duration of throughput test Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:39 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] app/bbdev: update offload test to dequeue full ring Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:55 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:27 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:28 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-24 7:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] BBDEV test updates David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB44516D8F1DA0AD688B285831F8190@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).