From: "Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"akhil.goyal@nxp.com" <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] app/bbdev: include explicit HARQ preloading
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:50:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB44517E6ABF75088F5D5EA4F9F8190@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6863b163-cab4-7c60-750b-d96c7d59172c@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:32 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] app/bbdev: include explicit HARQ preloading
>
>
> On 10/23/20 4:42 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > Run preloading explicitly for unit tests. Load each code block by
> > reusing existing input op then restore for the actual test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Liu Tianjiao <tianjiao.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-bbdev/main.h | 1 +
> > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 51
> > +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/main.h b/app/test-bbdev/main.h index
> > fb3dec8..dc10a50 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/main.h
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/main.h
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #define TEST_SKIPPED 1
> >
> > #define MAX_BURST 512U
> > +#define MAX_OPS 1024U
>
> This #define is not consistently used.
>
> ex/ see retrieve_harq_ddr, the old 1024 is still being used.
Thanks I missed it. I will change this now.
>
> > #define DEFAULT_BURST 32U
> > #define DEFAULT_OPS 64U
> > #define DEFAULT_ITER 6U
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index b62848e..f30cbdb 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -2513,20 +2513,20 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> > bool preload)
> > {
> > uint16_t j;
> > - int ret;
> > - uint32_t harq_offset = (uint32_t) queue_id * HARQ_INCR * 1024;
> > - struct rte_bbdev_op_data save_hc_in, save_hc_out;
> > - struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ops_deq[MAX_BURST];
> > + int deq;
> > + uint32_t harq_offset = (uint32_t) queue_id * HARQ_INCR *
> MAX_OPS;
> > + struct rte_bbdev_op_data save_hc_in[MAX_OPS],
> save_hc_out[MAX_OPS];
> > + struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ops_deq[MAX_OPS];
> > uint32_t flags = ops[0]->ldpc_dec.op_flags;
> > bool mem_in = flags &
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_INTERNAL_HARQ_MEMORY_IN_ENABLE;
> > bool hc_in = flags & RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
> > bool mem_out = flags &
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_INTERNAL_HARQ_MEMORY_OUT_ENABLE;
> > bool hc_out = flags &
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_OUT_ENABLE;
> > bool h_comp = flags &
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HARQ_6BIT_COMPRESSION;
> > - for (j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
> > - if ((mem_in || hc_in) && preload) {
> > - save_hc_in = ops[j]-
> >ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input;
> > - save_hc_out = ops[j]-
> >ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output;
> > + if ((mem_in || hc_in) && preload) {
> > + for (j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
> > + save_hc_in[j] = ops[j]-
> >ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input;
> > + save_hc_out[j] = ops[j]-
> >ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output;
> > ops[j]->ldpc_dec.op_flags =
> >
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_INTERNAL_HARQ_MEMORY_LOOPBACK +
> >
> RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_INTERNAL_HARQ_MEMORY_OUT_ENABLE;
>
> flags are usually handled with bit operators, not arithmetic.
>
> this seems to be a general issue.
This is keeping same coding style as rest of file. So keeping as is.
>
> > @@ -2536,16 +2536,23 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> > ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.offset =
> > harq_offset;
> > ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.offset = 0;
> > - rte_bbdev_enqueue_ldpc_dec_ops(dev_id, queue_id,
> > - &ops[j], 1);
> > - ret = 0;
> > - while (ret == 0)
> > - ret = rte_bbdev_dequeue_ldpc_dec_ops(
> > - dev_id, queue_id, &ops_deq[j], 1);
> > + harq_offset += HARQ_INCR;
> > + }
> > + rte_bbdev_enqueue_ldpc_dec_ops(dev_id, queue_id,
> &ops[0], n);
> Add check the return is 'n'
> > + deq = 0;
> > + while (deq != n)
> > + deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_ldpc_dec_ops(
> > + dev_id, queue_id, &ops_deq[deq],
> > + n - deq);
>
> Add check the return >= 0
This cannot be <0. uint16_t
>
> Tom
>
> > + /* Restore the operations */
> > + for (j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
> > ops[j]->ldpc_dec.op_flags = flags;
> > - ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input =
> save_hc_in;
> > - ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output =
> save_hc_out;
> > + ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input =
> save_hc_in[j];
> > + ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output =
> save_hc_out[j];
> > }
> > + }
> > + harq_offset = (uint32_t) queue_id * HARQ_INCR * MAX_OPS;
> > + for (j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
> > /* Adjust HARQ offset when we reach external DDR */
> > if (mem_in || hc_in)
> > ops[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.offset
> > @@ -3231,11 +3238,9 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> > mbuf_reset(
> > ops_enq[j]-
> >ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
> > }
> > - if (extDdr) {
> > - bool preload = i == (TEST_REPETITIONS - 1);
> > + if (extDdr)
> > preload_harq_ddr(tp->dev_id, queue_id, ops_enq,
> > - num_ops, preload);
> > - }
> > + num_ops, true);
> > start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> >
> > for (enq = 0, deq = 0; enq < num_ops;) { @@ -3362,11
> +3367,9 @@
> > typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> > mbuf_reset(
> > ops_enq[j]-
> >ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
> > }
> > - if (extDdr) {
> > - bool preload = i == (TEST_REPETITIONS - 1);
> > + if (extDdr)
> > preload_harq_ddr(tp->dev_id, queue_id, ops_enq,
> > - num_ops, preload);
> > - }
> > + num_ops, true);
> > start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> >
> > for (enq = 0, deq = 0; enq < num_ops;) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-23 23:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] BBDEV test updates Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] app/bbdev: add explicit ut for latency vs validation Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 12:55 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 17:30 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:37 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] app/bbdev: add explicit check for counters Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:05 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:29 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:31 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] app/bbdev: include explicit HARQ preloading Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:31 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:50 ` Chautru, Nicolas [this message]
2020-10-28 20:33 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] app/bbdev: define wait for offload Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:33 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:04 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:24 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] app/bbdev: skip bler ut when compression is used Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:35 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] app/bbdev: reduce duration of throughput test Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:39 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-23 23:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] app/bbdev: update offload test to dequeue full ring Nicolas Chautru
2020-10-26 13:55 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-26 16:27 ` Chautru, Nicolas
2020-10-28 20:28 ` Tom Rix
2020-10-24 7:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] BBDEV test updates David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB44517E6ABF75088F5D5EA4F9F8190@BY5PR11MB4451.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).