DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>,
	Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kni: fix build with Linux 6.3
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:10:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8x-n=i2aVmZdxSuxaLH1WDPSX3Lym=Qwrduk-prGDueGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zB91-L9X5UWgCO_Opv7+2kwAGfSa7m2e5gSR9yMkVsMA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:45 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 6:29 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > KNI calls `get_user_pages_remote()` API which is using `FOLL_TOUCH`
> > flag, but `FOLL_TOUCH` is no more in public headers since v6.3,
> > causing a build error.
>
> Something looks strange with what kni was doing.
>
> Looking at get_user_pages_remote implementation, I see it internally
> passes FOLL_TOUCH in addition to passed gup_flags.
> And looking at FOLL_TOUCH definition, it seems natural (to me) that
> this flag would be handled internally.
>
> Maybe it changed over time... but then the question is when did
> passing FOLL_TOUCH become unneeded?

Here is some more info.

get_user_pages_remote() was added in kernel commit 1e9877902dc7
("mm/gup: Introduce get_user_pages_remote()").
At this time, it was passing the FOLL_TOUCH flag internally.

+long get_user_pages_remote(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
+               unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
+               int write, int force, struct page **pages,
+               struct vm_area_struct **vmas)
 {
        return __get_user_pages_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, write, force,
-                                      pages, vmas, NULL, false, FOLL_TOUCH);
+                                      pages, vmas, NULL, false,
+                                      FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_REMOTE);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages_remote);

get_user_pages_remote() later gained the ability to pass gup flags in
kernel commit 9beae1ea8930 ("mm: replace get_user_pages_remote()
write/force parameters with gup_flags").
But FOLL_TOUCH was still added internally.

 long get_user_pages_remote(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
                unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
-               int write, int force, struct page **pages,
+               unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages,
                struct vm_area_struct **vmas)
 {
-       unsigned int flags = FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_REMOTE;
-
-       if (write)
-               flags |= FOLL_WRITE;
-       if (force)
-               flags |= FOLL_FORCE;
-
        return __get_user_pages_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, pages, vmas,
-                                      NULL, false, flags);
+                                      NULL, false,
+                                      gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_REMOTE);
 }


There were other changes in this area of the kernel code, but I did
not notice a change in relation with FOLL_TOUCH.

So I think the dpdk commit e73831dc6c26 ("kni: support userspace VA")
uselessly introduced call to this flag and we can remove it.
Adding author and reviewers of this change.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-28 17:29 Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-28 20:45 ` David Marchand
2023-03-20 12:10   ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-03-20 13:01     ` David Marchand
2023-03-24  3:04       ` [EXT] " Vamsi Krishna Attunuru
2023-04-13  7:22         ` David Marchand
2023-04-14 15:29       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-14 15:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-17  7:32   ` David Marchand
2023-04-19 14:38     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8x-n=i2aVmZdxSuxaLH1WDPSX3Lym=Qwrduk-prGDueGQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).