DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: properly parse 32-bit domain numbers
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 11:15:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xZz=b8EwqmbgyByPfrSXcEpM-Az7CEjDiERFJkta-5tQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512133057.106374-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:31 PM Darek Stojaczyk
<dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The parsing code was bailing on domains greater than UINT16_MAX,
> but domain numbers like that are still valid and present on some systems.
> One example is Intel VMD (Volume Management Device), which acts somewhat
> as a software-managed PCI switch and its upstream linux driver assigns
> all downstream devices a PCI domain of 0x10000.
>
> Parsing a BDF like 10000:01:00.0 was failing before. To fix it, increase
> the upper limit of domain number to UINT32_MAX. This matches the size of
> struct rte_pci_addr->domain (uint32).

Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

> Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Acked-by: Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>

Applied, thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-12 13:30 Darek Stojaczyk
2020-05-12 15:08 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-12 18:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-05-13  9:04   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-05-13 12:20     ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2020-05-19  9:15 ` David Marchand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xZz=b8EwqmbgyByPfrSXcEpM-Az7CEjDiERFJkta-5tQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=grive@u256.net \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).