DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	"Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:34:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0802MB2216AC7B9A06F1D466C415F198940@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0801MB20250B937AB94A11E65B40D59E970@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

<snip>

> >
> >
> > On 08/06/2020 06:16, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> > > Currently, the tbl8 group is freed even though the readers might be
> > > using the tbl8 group entries. The freed tbl8 group can be
> > > reallocated quickly. This results in incorrect lookup results.
> > >
> > > RCU QSBR process is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclaim.
> > > Refer to RCU documentation to understand various aspects of
> > > integrating RCU library into other libraries.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst  |  32 ++++++++
> > >   lib/librte_lpm/Makefile            |   2 +-
> > >   lib/librte_lpm/meson.build         |   1 +
> > >   lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c           | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >   lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h           |  59 ++++++++++++++
> > >   lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map |   6 ++
> > >   6 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > b/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > index 1609a57d0..7cc99044a 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > @@ -145,6 +145,38 @@ depending on whether we need to move to the
> > next table or not.
> > >   Prefix expansion is one of the keys of this algorithm,
> > >   since it improves the speed dramatically by adding redundancy.
> > >
> > > +Deletion
> > > +~~~~~~~~
> > > +
> > > +When deleting a rule, a replacement rule is searched for.
> > > +Replacement rule is an existing rule that has the longest prefix
> > > +match with the rule to be
> > deleted, but has smaller depth.
> > > +
> > > +If a replacement rule is found, target tbl24 and tbl8 entries are
> > > +updated to have the same depth and next hop value with the
> > replacement rule.
> > > +
> > > +If no replacement rule can be found, target tbl24 and tbl8 entries
> > > +will be
> > cleared.
> > > +
> > > +Prefix expansion is performed if the rule's depth is not exactly 24
> > > +bits or
> > 32 bits.
> > > +
> > > +After deleting a rule, a group of tbl8s that belongs to the same
> > > +tbl24 entry
> > are freed in following cases:
> > > +
> > > +*   All tbl8s in the group are empty .
> > > +
> > > +*   All tbl8s in the group have the same values and with depth no
> greater
> > than 24.
> > > +
> > > +Free of tbl8s have different behaviors:
> > > +
> > > +*   If RCU is not used, tbl8s are cleared and reclaimed immediately.
> > > +
> > > +*   If RCU is used, tbl8s are reclaimed when readers are in quiescent
> state.
> > > +
> > > +When the LPM is not using RCU, tbl8 group can be freed immediately
> > > +even though the readers might be using the tbl8 group entries. This
> > > +might
> > result in incorrect lookup results.
> > > +
> > > +RCU QSBR process is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclaimation.
> > > +Application has certain responsibilities while using this feature.
> > > +Please refer to resource reclaimation framework of :ref:`RCU
> > > +library
> > <RCU_Library>` for more details.
> > > +
> > >   Lookup
> > >   ~~~~~~
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile b/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile index
> > > d682785b6..6f06c5c03 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ LIB = librte_lpm.a
> > >
> > >   CFLAGS += -O3
> > >   CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS) -I$(SRCDIR) -LDLIBS += -lrte_eal
> > > -lrte_hash
> > > +LDLIBS += -lrte_eal -lrte_hash -lrte_rcu
> > >
> > >   EXPORT_MAP := rte_lpm_version.map
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build b/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> > > index 021ac6d8d..6cfc083c5 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> > > @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ headers = files('rte_lpm.h', 'rte_lpm6.h')
> > >   # without worrying about which architecture we actually need
> > >   headers += files('rte_lpm_altivec.h', 'rte_lpm_neon.h', 'rte_lpm_sse.h')
> > >   deps += ['hash']
> > > +deps += ['rcu']
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > > index
> > > 38ab512a4..30f541179 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > >   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > >    * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> > > + * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> > >    */
> > >
> > >   #include <string.h>
> > > @@ -246,12 +247,85 @@ rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> > >
> > >   rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
> > >
> > > +if (lpm->dq)
> > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_delete(lpm->dq);
> > >   rte_free(lpm->tbl8);
> > >   rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl);
> > >   rte_free(lpm);
> > >   rte_free(te);
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +static void
> > > +__lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource(void *p, void *data, unsigned int n) {
> > > +struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry zero_tbl8_entry = {0}; uint32_t
> > > +tbl8_group_index = *(uint32_t *)data; struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry
> > > +*tbl8 = (struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *)p;
> > > +
> > > +RTE_SET_USED(n);
> > > +/* Set tbl8 group invalid */
> > > +__atomic_store(&tbl8[tbl8_group_index], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > +__ATOMIC_RELAXED); }
> > > +
> > > +/* Associate QSBR variable with an LPM object.
> > > + */
> > > +int
> > > +rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config
> > *cfg,
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq)
> > > +{
> > > +char rcu_dq_name[RTE_RCU_QSBR_DQ_NAMESIZE];
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_parameters params = {0};
> > > +
> > > +if ((lpm == NULL) || (cfg == NULL)) { rte_errno = EINVAL; return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (lpm->v) {
> > > +rte_errno = EEXIST;
> > > +return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (cfg->mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC) {
> > > +/* No other things to do. */
> > > +} else if (cfg->mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ) {
> > > +/* Init QSBR defer queue. */
> > > +snprintf(rcu_dq_name, sizeof(rcu_dq_name), "LPM_RCU_%s",
> > > +lpm->name); params.name = rcu_dq_name; params.size = cfg->dq_size;
> > > +if (params.size == 0) params.size = lpm->number_tbl8s;
> > > +params.trigger_reclaim_limit = cfg->reclaim_thd; if
> > > +(params.trigger_reclaim_limit == 0)
> >
> >
> > This makes it impossible for a user to configure reclamation
> > triggering with every call. Should we allow it?
> Yes, use (reclaim_thd = 0) to trigger reclamation at each dq enqueue should
> be a valid case.
> Will remove value overriding and take it as is.
> >
> >
> > > +params.trigger_reclaim_limit =
> > > +RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_THD;
> > > +params.max_reclaim_size = cfg->reclaim_max; if
> > > +(params.max_reclaim_size == 0) params.max_reclaim_size =
> > RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX;
> > > +params.esize = sizeof(uint32_t);/* tbl8 group index */
> > > +params.free_fn = __lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource; params.p =
> > > +lpm->tbl8;
> >
> >
> > I think it's better to pass the LPM pointer here rather than tbl8, for
> > example, in case we decide to add some counters in the future
> Use LPM pointer is more extendable.
> Will change in next version.
> >
> >
> > > +params.v = cfg->v;
> > > +lpm->dq = rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_create(&params);
> > > +if (lpm->dq == NULL) {
> > > +RTE_LOG(ERR, LPM,
> > > +"LPM QS defer queue creation
> > failed\n");
> > > +return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +if (dq)
> > > +*dq = lpm->dq;
> > > +} else {
> > > +rte_errno = EINVAL;
> > > +return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +lpm->rcu_mode = cfg->mode;
> > > +lpm->v = cfg->v;
> > > +
> > > +return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   /*
> > >    * Adds a rule to the rule table.
> > >    *
> > > @@ -394,14 +468,15 @@ rule_find(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked, uint8_t depth)
> > >    * Find, clean and allocate a tbl8.
> > >    */
> > >   static int32_t
> > > -tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t number_tbl8s)
> > > +_tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> > >   {
> > >   uint32_t group_idx; /* tbl8 group index. */
> > >   struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8_entry;
> > >
> > >   /* Scan through tbl8 to find a free (i.e. INVALID) tbl8 group. */
> > > -for (group_idx = 0; group_idx < number_tbl8s; group_idx++) {
> > > -tbl8_entry = &tbl8[group_idx *
> > RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES];
> > > +for (group_idx = 0; group_idx < lpm->number_tbl8s; group_idx++) {
> > > +tbl8_entry = &lpm->tbl8[group_idx *
> > > +
> > RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES];
> > >   /* If a free tbl8 group is found clean it and set as VALID. */
> > >   if (!tbl8_entry->valid_group) {
> > >   struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl8_entry = { @@ -427,14 +502,40 @@
> > > tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8,
> > uint32_t number_tbl8s)
> > >   return -ENOSPC;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > +static int32_t
> > > +tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> > > +{
> > > +int32_t group_idx; /* tbl8 group index. */
> > > +
> > > +group_idx = _tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> > > +if ((group_idx < 0) && (lpm->dq != NULL)) {
> >
> >
> > I think (group_idx == -ENOSPC) will be safer
> Will change it in next version.
> >
> >
> > > +/* If there are no tbl8 groups try to reclaim one. */ if
> > > +(rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim(lpm->dq, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL)
> > == 0)
> > > +group_idx = _tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> >
> >
> > I'm not really happy with this approach. _tbl8_alloc() produces linear
> > scan through the memory to find a free group_idx and it is the slowest
> > part of rte_lpm_add().
> > Here after reclamation of some group index we need to rescan a memory
> > again to find it. It would be great if there will be some way to
> > return reclaimed elements. Or just to dequeue elements from dq and
> > reclaim them manually.
> I think there is little chance a rescan will be needed. If RCU QSBR defer
> queue trigger_reclaim_limit is configured with reasonable value, tbl8 groups
> will be reclaimed regularly. So defer queue won't get too long.
> 
> Return reclaimed elements makes API complex. Not sure if it is useful for
> other use cases.
> @Honnappa Nagarahalli, any idea?
I think it is a problem that should be solved in LPM. I had hacked up the allocation scheme to use a ring when I was doing the performance testing. I can send that out if required.

> >
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +return group_idx;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >   static void
> > > -tbl8_free(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t
> > > tbl8_group_start)
> > > +tbl8_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t tbl8_group_start)
> > >   {
> > > -/* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> > >   struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry zero_tbl8_entry = {0};
> > >
> > > -__atomic_store(&tbl8[tbl8_group_start], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > -__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > +if (!lpm->v) {
> > > +/* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> > > +__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start],
> > &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > +__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > +} else if (lpm->rcu_mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC) {
> > > +/* Wait for quiescent state change. */
> > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_synchronize(lpm->v,
> > RTE_QSBR_THRID_INVALID);
> > > +/* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> > > +__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start],
> > &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > +__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > +} else if (lpm->rcu_mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ) {
> > > +/* Push into QSBR defer queue. */
> > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_enqueue(lpm->dq, (void
> > *)&tbl8_group_start);
> > > +}
> > >   }
> > >
> > >   static __rte_noinline int32_t
> > > @@ -523,7 +624,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
> > >
> > >   if (!lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid) {
> > >   /* Search for a free tbl8 group. */  -tbl8_group_index =
> > >tbl8_alloc(lpm->tbl8, lpm- number_tbl8s);
> > > +tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> > >
> > >   /* Check tbl8 allocation was successful. */
> > >   if (tbl8_group_index < 0) {
> > > @@ -569,7 +670,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
> > >   } /* If valid entry but not extended calculate the index into Table8. */
> > >   else if (lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid_group == 0) {
> > >   /* Search for free tbl8 group. */
> > > -tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm->tbl8, lpm- number_tbl8s);
> > > +tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> > >
> > >   if (tbl8_group_index < 0) {
> > >   return tbl8_group_index;
> > > @@ -977,7 +1078,7 @@ delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked,
> > >    */
> > >   lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid = 0;
> > >   __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> > > -tbl8_free(lpm->tbl8, tbl8_group_start);
> > > +tbl8_free(lpm, tbl8_group_start);
> > >   } else if (tbl8_recycle_index > -1) {
> > >   /* Update tbl24 entry. */
> > >   struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl24_entry = { @@ -993,7 +1094,7 @@
> > > delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked,
> > >   __atomic_store(&lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index],
> > &new_tbl24_entry,
> > >   __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > >   __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> > > -tbl8_free(lpm->tbl8, tbl8_group_start);
> > > +tbl8_free(lpm, tbl8_group_start);
> > >   }
> > >   #undef group_idx
> > >   return 0;
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> > > index b9d49ac87..8c054509a 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > >   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > >    * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> > > + * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> > >    */
> > >
> > >   #ifndef _RTE_LPM_H_
> > > @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
> > >   #include <rte_memory.h>
> > >   #include <rte_common.h>
> > >   #include <rte_vect.h>
> > > +#include <rte_rcu_qsbr.h>
> > >
> > >   #ifdef __cplusplus
> > >   extern "C" {
> > > @@ -62,6 +64,17 @@ extern "C" {
> > >   /** Bitmask used to indicate successful lookup */
> > >   #define RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS          0x01000000
> > >
> > > +/** @internal Default threshold to trigger RCU defer queue
> reclaimation.
> > */
> > > +#define RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_THD32
> > > +
> > > +/** @internal Default RCU defer queue entries to reclaim in one go.
> > > +*/ #define RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX16
> > > +
> > > +/* Create defer queue for reclaim. */ #define
> RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ0
> > > +/* Use blocking mode reclaim. No defer queue created. */ #define
> > > +RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC0x01
> >
> >
> > using enums instead of defines?
> Will convert to enums in next version.
> >
> >
> > > +
> > >   #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > >   /** @internal Tbl24 entry structure. */
> > >   __extension__
> > > @@ -130,6 +143,28 @@ struct rte_lpm {
> > >   __rte_cache_aligned; /**< LPM tbl24 table. */
> > >   struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8; /**< LPM tbl8 table. */
> > >   struct rte_lpm_rule *rules_tbl; /**< LPM rules. */
> > > +
> > > +/* RCU config. */
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v;/* RCU QSBR variable. */ uint32_t
> > > +rcu_mode;/* Blocking, defer queue. */ struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq;/*
> > > +RCU QSBR defer queue. */ };
> > > +
> > > +/** LPM RCU QSBR configuration structure. */ struct
> > > +rte_lpm_rcu_config { struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v;/* RCU QSBR variable.
> > > +*/
> > > +/* Mode of RCU QSBR. RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_xxx
> > > + * '0' for default: create defer queue for reclaim.
> > > + */
> > > +uint32_t mode;
> > > +/* RCU defer queue size. default: lpm->number_tbl8s. */ uint32_t
> > > +dq_size; uint32_t reclaim_thd;/* Threshold to trigger auto reclaim.
> > > + * default:
> > RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_TRHD.
> > > + */
> > > +uint32_t reclaim_max;/* Max entries to reclaim in one go.
> > > + * default:
> > RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX.
> > > + */
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   /**
> > > @@ -179,6 +214,30 @@ rte_lpm_find_existing(const char *name);
> > >   void
> > >   rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * @warning
> > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> > > + *
> > > + * Associate RCU QSBR variable with an LPM object.
> > > + *
> > > + * @param lpm
> > > + *   the lpm object to add RCU QSBR
> > > + * @param cfg
> > > + *   RCU QSBR configuration
> > > + * @param dq
> > > + *   handler of created RCU QSBR defer queue
> > > + * @return
> > > + *   On success - 0
> > > + *   On error - 1 with error code set in rte_errno.
> > > + *   Possible rte_errno codes are:
> > > + *   - EINVAL - invalid pointer
> > > + *   - EEXIST - already added QSBR
> > > + *   - ENOMEM - memory allocation failure
> > > + */
> > > +__rte_experimental
> > > +int rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct
> > rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq);
> > > +
> > >   /**
> > >    * Add a rule to the LPM table.
> > >    *
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > > index 500f58b80..bfccd7eac 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > > @@ -21,3 +21,9 @@ DPDK_20.0 {
> > >
> > >   local: *;
> > >   };
> > > +
> > > +EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > +global:
> > > +
> > > +rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add;
> > > +};
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23  4:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-22  6:34 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22  6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-23  1:23   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-26  3:11     ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-26  5:32       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-08-22 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06  9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-18 16:15     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19  6:17       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:45     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19  6:22       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06  9:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:46     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/ring: add peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:42       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 19:49         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07  9:01           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09  4:25             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-10 15:09               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11  5:03                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-11 14:41                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 18:28                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-13 20:09                       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-14  4:11                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/rcu: add resource reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 17:39       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03  6:29         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 12:26           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04  6:07             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 10:46               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13  4:35                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:50       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03  6:42         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 11:52           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 19:01       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-07 13:11       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-13  3:02         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 16:48           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-18  3:47             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01  6:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-29 20:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-30 17:37       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-07 17:39         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-19 23:22           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-20  8:19             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  3:30     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  8:36         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22  8:42           ` David Marchand
2020-04-22  8:51             ` David Marchand
2020-04-22  9:26               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  8:27         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  3:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22  8:25         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 18:46       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs David Marchand
2019-10-01 18:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-04 16:05       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-09  3:48         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07  9:21       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13  4:36         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 11:15           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18  3:32             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 13:02       ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-03  9:09         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08  5:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08  5:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 18:46       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-18 17:36         ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-18 17:21       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-22  5:46         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-23  4:34           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-06-08  5:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08  5:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29  8:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 11:56       ` David Marchand
2020-06-29 12:55         ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-30 10:35           ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-03  7:43         ` David Marchand
2020-07-04 17:00         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-30 10:33       ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-29  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29  8:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:36       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:30       ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 15:34         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:00         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37       ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:07         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 11:49       ` David Marchand
2020-07-09 14:35         ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09  8:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:29       ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10  2:29       ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 12:21     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library David Marchand
2020-07-10 14:34       ` Ruifeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB6PR0802MB2216AC7B9A06F1D466C415F198940@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).