From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 04:34:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0802MB2216AC7B9A06F1D466C415F198940@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0801MB20250B937AB94A11E65B40D59E970@HE1PR0801MB2025.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
<snip>
> >
> >
> > On 08/06/2020 06:16, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> > > Currently, the tbl8 group is freed even though the readers might be
> > > using the tbl8 group entries. The freed tbl8 group can be
> > > reallocated quickly. This results in incorrect lookup results.
> > >
> > > RCU QSBR process is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclaim.
> > > Refer to RCU documentation to understand various aspects of
> > > integrating RCU library into other libraries.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst | 32 ++++++++
> > > lib/librte_lpm/Makefile | 2 +-
> > > lib/librte_lpm/meson.build | 1 +
> > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 59 ++++++++++++++
> > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map | 6 ++
> > > 6 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > b/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > index 1609a57d0..7cc99044a 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/lpm_lib.rst
> > > @@ -145,6 +145,38 @@ depending on whether we need to move to the
> > next table or not.
> > > Prefix expansion is one of the keys of this algorithm,
> > > since it improves the speed dramatically by adding redundancy.
> > >
> > > +Deletion
> > > +~~~~~~~~
> > > +
> > > +When deleting a rule, a replacement rule is searched for.
> > > +Replacement rule is an existing rule that has the longest prefix
> > > +match with the rule to be
> > deleted, but has smaller depth.
> > > +
> > > +If a replacement rule is found, target tbl24 and tbl8 entries are
> > > +updated to have the same depth and next hop value with the
> > replacement rule.
> > > +
> > > +If no replacement rule can be found, target tbl24 and tbl8 entries
> > > +will be
> > cleared.
> > > +
> > > +Prefix expansion is performed if the rule's depth is not exactly 24
> > > +bits or
> > 32 bits.
> > > +
> > > +After deleting a rule, a group of tbl8s that belongs to the same
> > > +tbl24 entry
> > are freed in following cases:
> > > +
> > > +* All tbl8s in the group are empty .
> > > +
> > > +* All tbl8s in the group have the same values and with depth no
> greater
> > than 24.
> > > +
> > > +Free of tbl8s have different behaviors:
> > > +
> > > +* If RCU is not used, tbl8s are cleared and reclaimed immediately.
> > > +
> > > +* If RCU is used, tbl8s are reclaimed when readers are in quiescent
> state.
> > > +
> > > +When the LPM is not using RCU, tbl8 group can be freed immediately
> > > +even though the readers might be using the tbl8 group entries. This
> > > +might
> > result in incorrect lookup results.
> > > +
> > > +RCU QSBR process is integrated for safe tbl8 group reclaimation.
> > > +Application has certain responsibilities while using this feature.
> > > +Please refer to resource reclaimation framework of :ref:`RCU
> > > +library
> > <RCU_Library>` for more details.
> > > +
> > > Lookup
> > > ~~~~~~
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile b/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile index
> > > d682785b6..6f06c5c03 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/Makefile
> > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ LIB = librte_lpm.a
> > >
> > > CFLAGS += -O3
> > > CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS) -I$(SRCDIR) -LDLIBS += -lrte_eal
> > > -lrte_hash
> > > +LDLIBS += -lrte_eal -lrte_hash -lrte_rcu
> > >
> > > EXPORT_MAP := rte_lpm_version.map
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build b/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> > > index 021ac6d8d..6cfc083c5 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/meson.build
> > > @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ headers = files('rte_lpm.h', 'rte_lpm6.h')
> > > # without worrying about which architecture we actually need
> > > headers += files('rte_lpm_altivec.h', 'rte_lpm_neon.h', 'rte_lpm_sse.h')
> > > deps += ['hash']
> > > +deps += ['rcu']
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > > index
> > > 38ab512a4..30f541179 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> > > + * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> > > */
> > >
> > > #include <string.h>
> > > @@ -246,12 +247,85 @@ rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> > >
> > > rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
> > >
> > > +if (lpm->dq)
> > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_delete(lpm->dq);
> > > rte_free(lpm->tbl8);
> > > rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl);
> > > rte_free(lpm);
> > > rte_free(te);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void
> > > +__lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource(void *p, void *data, unsigned int n) {
> > > +struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry zero_tbl8_entry = {0}; uint32_t
> > > +tbl8_group_index = *(uint32_t *)data; struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry
> > > +*tbl8 = (struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *)p;
> > > +
> > > +RTE_SET_USED(n);
> > > +/* Set tbl8 group invalid */
> > > +__atomic_store(&tbl8[tbl8_group_index], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > +__ATOMIC_RELAXED); }
> > > +
> > > +/* Associate QSBR variable with an LPM object.
> > > + */
> > > +int
> > > +rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct rte_lpm_rcu_config
> > *cfg,
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq)
> > > +{
> > > +char rcu_dq_name[RTE_RCU_QSBR_DQ_NAMESIZE];
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_parameters params = {0};
> > > +
> > > +if ((lpm == NULL) || (cfg == NULL)) { rte_errno = EINVAL; return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (lpm->v) {
> > > +rte_errno = EEXIST;
> > > +return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +if (cfg->mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC) {
> > > +/* No other things to do. */
> > > +} else if (cfg->mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ) {
> > > +/* Init QSBR defer queue. */
> > > +snprintf(rcu_dq_name, sizeof(rcu_dq_name), "LPM_RCU_%s",
> > > +lpm->name); params.name = rcu_dq_name; params.size = cfg->dq_size;
> > > +if (params.size == 0) params.size = lpm->number_tbl8s;
> > > +params.trigger_reclaim_limit = cfg->reclaim_thd; if
> > > +(params.trigger_reclaim_limit == 0)
> >
> >
> > This makes it impossible for a user to configure reclamation
> > triggering with every call. Should we allow it?
> Yes, use (reclaim_thd = 0) to trigger reclamation at each dq enqueue should
> be a valid case.
> Will remove value overriding and take it as is.
> >
> >
> > > +params.trigger_reclaim_limit =
> > > +RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_THD;
> > > +params.max_reclaim_size = cfg->reclaim_max; if
> > > +(params.max_reclaim_size == 0) params.max_reclaim_size =
> > RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX;
> > > +params.esize = sizeof(uint32_t);/* tbl8 group index */
> > > +params.free_fn = __lpm_rcu_qsbr_free_resource; params.p =
> > > +lpm->tbl8;
> >
> >
> > I think it's better to pass the LPM pointer here rather than tbl8, for
> > example, in case we decide to add some counters in the future
> Use LPM pointer is more extendable.
> Will change in next version.
> >
> >
> > > +params.v = cfg->v;
> > > +lpm->dq = rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_create(¶ms);
> > > +if (lpm->dq == NULL) {
> > > +RTE_LOG(ERR, LPM,
> > > +"LPM QS defer queue creation
> > failed\n");
> > > +return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +if (dq)
> > > +*dq = lpm->dq;
> > > +} else {
> > > +rte_errno = EINVAL;
> > > +return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +lpm->rcu_mode = cfg->mode;
> > > +lpm->v = cfg->v;
> > > +
> > > +return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Adds a rule to the rule table.
> > > *
> > > @@ -394,14 +468,15 @@ rule_find(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked, uint8_t depth)
> > > * Find, clean and allocate a tbl8.
> > > */
> > > static int32_t
> > > -tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t number_tbl8s)
> > > +_tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> > > {
> > > uint32_t group_idx; /* tbl8 group index. */
> > > struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8_entry;
> > >
> > > /* Scan through tbl8 to find a free (i.e. INVALID) tbl8 group. */
> > > -for (group_idx = 0; group_idx < number_tbl8s; group_idx++) {
> > > -tbl8_entry = &tbl8[group_idx *
> > RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES];
> > > +for (group_idx = 0; group_idx < lpm->number_tbl8s; group_idx++) {
> > > +tbl8_entry = &lpm->tbl8[group_idx *
> > > +
> > RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES];
> > > /* If a free tbl8 group is found clean it and set as VALID. */
> > > if (!tbl8_entry->valid_group) {
> > > struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl8_entry = { @@ -427,14 +502,40 @@
> > > tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8,
> > uint32_t number_tbl8s)
> > > return -ENOSPC;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int32_t
> > > +tbl8_alloc(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
> > > +{
> > > +int32_t group_idx; /* tbl8 group index. */
> > > +
> > > +group_idx = _tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> > > +if ((group_idx < 0) && (lpm->dq != NULL)) {
> >
> >
> > I think (group_idx == -ENOSPC) will be safer
> Will change it in next version.
> >
> >
> > > +/* If there are no tbl8 groups try to reclaim one. */ if
> > > +(rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim(lpm->dq, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL)
> > == 0)
> > > +group_idx = _tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> >
> >
> > I'm not really happy with this approach. _tbl8_alloc() produces linear
> > scan through the memory to find a free group_idx and it is the slowest
> > part of rte_lpm_add().
> > Here after reclamation of some group index we need to rescan a memory
> > again to find it. It would be great if there will be some way to
> > return reclaimed elements. Or just to dequeue elements from dq and
> > reclaim them manually.
> I think there is little chance a rescan will be needed. If RCU QSBR defer
> queue trigger_reclaim_limit is configured with reasonable value, tbl8 groups
> will be reclaimed regularly. So defer queue won't get too long.
>
> Return reclaimed elements makes API complex. Not sure if it is useful for
> other use cases.
> @Honnappa Nagarahalli, any idea?
I think it is a problem that should be solved in LPM. I had hacked up the allocation scheme to use a ring when I was doing the performance testing. I can send that out if required.
> >
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +return group_idx;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static void
> > > -tbl8_free(struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8, uint32_t
> > > tbl8_group_start)
> > > +tbl8_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t tbl8_group_start)
> > > {
> > > -/* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> > > struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry zero_tbl8_entry = {0};
> > >
> > > -__atomic_store(&tbl8[tbl8_group_start], &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > -__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > +if (!lpm->v) {
> > > +/* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> > > +__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start],
> > &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > +__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > +} else if (lpm->rcu_mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC) {
> > > +/* Wait for quiescent state change. */
> > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_synchronize(lpm->v,
> > RTE_QSBR_THRID_INVALID);
> > > +/* Set tbl8 group invalid*/
> > > +__atomic_store(&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_group_start],
> > &zero_tbl8_entry,
> > > +__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > +} else if (lpm->rcu_mode == RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ) {
> > > +/* Push into QSBR defer queue. */
> > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_enqueue(lpm->dq, (void
> > *)&tbl8_group_start);
> > > +}
> > > }
> > >
> > > static __rte_noinline int32_t
> > > @@ -523,7 +624,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
> > >
> > > if (!lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid) {
> > > /* Search for a free tbl8 group. */ -tbl8_group_index =
> > >tbl8_alloc(lpm->tbl8, lpm- number_tbl8s);
> > > +tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> > >
> > > /* Check tbl8 allocation was successful. */
> > > if (tbl8_group_index < 0) {
> > > @@ -569,7 +670,7 @@ add_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked, uint8_t depth,
> > > } /* If valid entry but not extended calculate the index into Table8. */
> > > else if (lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid_group == 0) {
> > > /* Search for free tbl8 group. */
> > > -tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm->tbl8, lpm- number_tbl8s);
> > > +tbl8_group_index = tbl8_alloc(lpm);
> > >
> > > if (tbl8_group_index < 0) {
> > > return tbl8_group_index;
> > > @@ -977,7 +1078,7 @@ delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked,
> > > */
> > > lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index].valid = 0;
> > > __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> > > -tbl8_free(lpm->tbl8, tbl8_group_start);
> > > +tbl8_free(lpm, tbl8_group_start);
> > > } else if (tbl8_recycle_index > -1) {
> > > /* Update tbl24 entry. */
> > > struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry new_tbl24_entry = { @@ -993,7 +1094,7 @@
> > > delete_depth_big(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked,
> > > __atomic_store(&lpm->tbl24[tbl24_index],
> > &new_tbl24_entry,
> > > __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > > __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> > > -tbl8_free(lpm->tbl8, tbl8_group_start);
> > > +tbl8_free(lpm, tbl8_group_start);
> > > }
> > > #undef group_idx
> > > return 0;
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> > > index b9d49ac87..8c054509a 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> > > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> > > + * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> > > */
> > >
> > > #ifndef _RTE_LPM_H_
> > > @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@
> > > #include <rte_memory.h>
> > > #include <rte_common.h>
> > > #include <rte_vect.h>
> > > +#include <rte_rcu_qsbr.h>
> > >
> > > #ifdef __cplusplus
> > > extern "C" {
> > > @@ -62,6 +64,17 @@ extern "C" {
> > > /** Bitmask used to indicate successful lookup */
> > > #define RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS 0x01000000
> > >
> > > +/** @internal Default threshold to trigger RCU defer queue
> reclaimation.
> > */
> > > +#define RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_THD32
> > > +
> > > +/** @internal Default RCU defer queue entries to reclaim in one go.
> > > +*/ #define RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX16
> > > +
> > > +/* Create defer queue for reclaim. */ #define
> RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_DQ0
> > > +/* Use blocking mode reclaim. No defer queue created. */ #define
> > > +RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_SYNC0x01
> >
> >
> > using enums instead of defines?
> Will convert to enums in next version.
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > #if RTE_BYTE_ORDER == RTE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
> > > /** @internal Tbl24 entry structure. */
> > > __extension__
> > > @@ -130,6 +143,28 @@ struct rte_lpm {
> > > __rte_cache_aligned; /**< LPM tbl24 table. */
> > > struct rte_lpm_tbl_entry *tbl8; /**< LPM tbl8 table. */
> > > struct rte_lpm_rule *rules_tbl; /**< LPM rules. */
> > > +
> > > +/* RCU config. */
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v;/* RCU QSBR variable. */ uint32_t
> > > +rcu_mode;/* Blocking, defer queue. */ struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq;/*
> > > +RCU QSBR defer queue. */ };
> > > +
> > > +/** LPM RCU QSBR configuration structure. */ struct
> > > +rte_lpm_rcu_config { struct rte_rcu_qsbr *v;/* RCU QSBR variable.
> > > +*/
> > > +/* Mode of RCU QSBR. RTE_LPM_QSBR_MODE_xxx
> > > + * '0' for default: create defer queue for reclaim.
> > > + */
> > > +uint32_t mode;
> > > +/* RCU defer queue size. default: lpm->number_tbl8s. */ uint32_t
> > > +dq_size; uint32_t reclaim_thd;/* Threshold to trigger auto reclaim.
> > > + * default:
> > RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_TRHD.
> > > + */
> > > +uint32_t reclaim_max;/* Max entries to reclaim in one go.
> > > + * default:
> > RTE_LPM_RCU_DQ_RECLAIM_MAX.
> > > + */
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -179,6 +214,30 @@ rte_lpm_find_existing(const char *name);
> > > void
> > > rte_lpm_free(struct rte_lpm *lpm);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * @warning
> > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> > > + *
> > > + * Associate RCU QSBR variable with an LPM object.
> > > + *
> > > + * @param lpm
> > > + * the lpm object to add RCU QSBR
> > > + * @param cfg
> > > + * RCU QSBR configuration
> > > + * @param dq
> > > + * handler of created RCU QSBR defer queue
> > > + * @return
> > > + * On success - 0
> > > + * On error - 1 with error code set in rte_errno.
> > > + * Possible rte_errno codes are:
> > > + * - EINVAL - invalid pointer
> > > + * - EEXIST - already added QSBR
> > > + * - ENOMEM - memory allocation failure
> > > + */
> > > +__rte_experimental
> > > +int rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(struct rte_lpm *lpm, struct
> > rte_lpm_rcu_config *cfg,
> > > +struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq **dq);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * Add a rule to the LPM table.
> > > *
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > > index 500f58b80..bfccd7eac 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_version.map
> > > @@ -21,3 +21,9 @@ DPDK_20.0 {
> > >
> > > local: *;
> > > };
> > > +
> > > +EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > +global:
> > > +
> > > +rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add;
> > > +};
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 6:34 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/3] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-22 6:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-23 1:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-26 3:11 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-26 5:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-08-22 15:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] lib/ring: add peek API Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-18 16:15 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:17 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] test/lpm: reset total time Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-18 16:17 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-09-19 6:22 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-09-06 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2019-09-06 19:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/ring: add peek API Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 19:49 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09 4:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-10 15:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 5:03 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-11 14:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 18:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-13 20:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-14 4:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lib/rcu: add resource reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:29 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 12:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 6:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 10:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 18:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-03 6:42 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-03 11:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-04 19:01 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-07 13:11 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-13 3:02 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 16:48 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-18 3:47 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 6:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-03-29 20:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] Add RCU reclamation APIs Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-30 17:37 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-07 17:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-19 23:22 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-20 8:19 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-03 18:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/rcu: add resource " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 8:42 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 8:51 ` David Marchand
2020-04-22 9:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/rcu: test cases for RCU defer queue APIs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:27 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] doc/rcu: add RCU integration design details Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 3:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] lib/rcu: add additional debug logs Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-22 8:25 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-22 18:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Add RCU reclamation APIs David Marchand
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-04 16:05 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-10-09 3:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-07 9:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-13 4:36 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-15 11:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-18 3:32 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: add test case for LPM RCU integration Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-01 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-02 13:02 ` Aaron Conole
2019-10-03 9:09 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 18:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-18 17:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-18 17:21 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-06-22 5:46 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-23 4:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-08 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 11:56 ` David Marchand
2020-06-29 12:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-06-30 10:35 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-07-03 7:43 ` David Marchand
2020-07-04 17:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-30 10:33 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-29 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-06-29 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 14:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:30 ` David Marchand
2020-07-08 15:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:00 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-07 15:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-07-08 14:07 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 11:49 ` David Marchand
2020-07-09 14:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-09 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] lib/lpm: integrate RCU QSBR Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/3] test/lpm: add LPM RCU integration functional tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/3] test/lpm: add RCU integration performance tests Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 2:29 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-07-10 12:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/3] RCU integration with LPM library David Marchand
2020-07-10 14:34 ` Ruifeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB6PR0802MB2216AC7B9A06F1D466C415F198940@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).