From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
"Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
Li Zhang <lizh@nvidia.com>, Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
"lironh@marvell.com" <lironh@marvell.com>,
"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
Roni Bar Yanai <roniba@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] [RFC]: ethdev: add pre-defined meter policy API
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:23:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB498712C16C8D778DCC806F8FD67E9@DM6PR12MB4987.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR12MB24928BE9B1C6ACFC7FA3368EDF629@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Hi All,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC]: ethdev: add pre-defined meter policy API
>
> Hi Cristian
>
> Thank you for your important review!
> I agree with all your comments except one, please see inline.
>
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > Hi Li and Matan,
> >
> > Thank you for your proposal, some comments below.
> >
> > I am also adding Jerin and Hemant to this thread, as they also participated in
> > the definition of the rte_mtr API in 2017. Also Ajit expressed some interest in
> a
> > previous email.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Li Zhang <lizh@nvidia.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 8:58 AM
> > > To: dekelp@nvidia.com; orika@nvidia.com; viacheslavo@nvidia.com;
> > > matan@nvidia.com; shahafs@nvidia.com; lironh@marvell.com; Singh,
> > > Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> > > <thomas@monjalon.net>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Andrew
> > > Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > > <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; rasland@nvidia.com; roniba@nvidia.com
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC]: ethdev: add pre-defined meter policy API
> > >
> > > Currently, the flow meter policy does not support multiple actions per
> > > color; also the allowed action types per color are very limited.
> > > In addition, the policy cannot be pre-defined.
> > >
> > > Due to the growing in flow actions offload abilities there is a
> > > potential for the user to use variety of actions per color differently.
> > > This new meter policy API comes to allow this potential in the most
> > > ethdev common way using rte_flow action definition.
> > > A list of rte_flow actions will be provided by the user per color in
> > > order to create a meter policy.
> > > In addition, the API forces to pre-define the policy before the meters
> > > creation in order to allow sharing of single policy with multiple
> > > meters efficiently.
> > >
> > > meter_policy_id is added into struct rte_mtr_params.
> > > So that it can get the policy during the meters creation.
> > >
> > > Policy id 0 is default policy. Action per color as below:
> > > green - no action, yellow - no action, red - drop
> > >
> > > Allow coloring the packet using a new rte_flow_action_color as could
> > > be done by the old policy API,
> > >
> >
> > The proposal essentially is to define the meter policy based on rte_flow
> actions
> > rather than a reduced action set defined specifically just for meter object.
> This
> > makes sense to me.
> >
> > > The next API function were added:
> > > - rte_mtr_meter_policy_add
> > > - rte_mtr_meter_policy_delete
> > > - rte_mtr_meter_policy_update
> > > - rte_mtr_meter_policy_validate
> > > The next struct was changed:
> > > - rte_mtr_params
> > > - rte_mtr_capabilities
> > > The next API was deleted:
> > > - rte_mtr_policer_actions_update
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <lizh@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 18 ++++
> > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_mtr.c | 55 ++++++++--
> > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_mtr.h | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_mtr_driver.h | 45 ++++++--
> > > 4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h index 669e677e91..5f38aa7fa4 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > > #include <rte_ecpri.h>
> > > #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> > > #include <rte_mbuf_dyn.h>
> > > +#include <rte_meter.h>
> > >
> > > #ifdef __cplusplus
> > > extern "C" {
> > > @@ -2236,6 +2237,13 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> > > * See struct rte_flow_action_modify_field.
> > > */
> > > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MODIFY_FIELD,
> > > +
> > > + /**
> > > + * Color the packet to reflect the meter color result.
> > > + *
> > > + * See struct rte_flow_action_color.
> > > + */
> > > + RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COlOR,
> >
> > Typo here, it should be RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COLOR.
> >
Why do we need this action?
if it is to save the color it should be done by using mark/metadata
Or by the action of meter. For example you can see RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SECURITY
Which if exist saves the session id to a dedicated mbuf field.
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
[Snip]
> > I suggest you do not redundantly specify the value of the default policy ID in
> the
> > comment. Replace by "Default policy ID."
> >
> > > + * Action per color as below:
> > > + * green - no action, yellow - no action, red - drop
> >
> > This does not make sense to me as the default policy. The default policy
> should
> > be "no change", i.e. green -> green (no change), yellow -> yellow (no change),
> > red -> red (no change).
>
> Can you explain why it doesn't make sense to you?
>
> Meter with "no change" for all colors has no effect on the packets so it is
> redundant action which just costs performance and resources - probably never
> be used.
>
> The most common usage for meter is to drop all the packets come above the
> defined rate limit - so it makes sense to take this behavior as default.
>
>
> > I suggest we avoid the "no action" statement, as it might be confusing.
>
> Maybe "do nothing" is better?
>
Maybe passthrough? Or in rte_flow passthru
> > > + * It can be used without creating it by the rte_mtr_meter_policy_add
> > > function.
> > > + */
Best,
Ori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-29 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 8:58 Li Zhang
2021-03-18 8:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] [RFC]: ethdev: manage meter API object handles by the drivers Li Zhang
2021-03-23 21:33 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-03-25 8:21 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-25 23:16 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-29 19:56 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-27 13:15 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-29 20:10 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-31 10:22 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-23 21:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] [RFC]: ethdev: add pre-defined meter policy API Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-03-25 6:56 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-29 9:23 ` Ori Kam [this message]
2021-03-29 16:24 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-01 13:13 ` Ori Kam
2021-04-01 13:35 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-01 14:22 ` Ori Kam
2021-03-29 16:08 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-03-29 20:43 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-31 15:46 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-04 13:48 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-29 10:38 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-29 20:31 ` Matan Azrad
2021-03-31 10:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-13 0:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Support " Li Zhang
2021-04-13 0:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Li Zhang
2021-04-13 14:19 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-14 3:23 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-13 14:59 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-14 4:55 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-14 8:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-14 8:31 ` Matan Azrad
2021-04-14 8:47 ` Asaf Penso
2021-04-14 8:59 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-14 9:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-14 14:00 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-14 16:21 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-13 16:25 ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-13 0:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Li Zhang
2021-04-14 3:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] Support meter policy API Li Zhang
2021-04-14 3:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Li Zhang
2021-04-14 3:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Li Zhang
2021-04-14 6:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Support meter policy API Li Zhang
2021-04-14 6:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Li Zhang
2021-04-14 6:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Li Zhang
2021-04-14 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] Support meter policy API Li Zhang
2021-04-14 8:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Li Zhang
2021-04-14 16:16 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-15 1:59 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-14 22:21 ` Singh, Jasvinder
2021-04-15 2:00 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-14 8:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Li Zhang
2021-04-15 4:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] Support meter policy API Li Zhang
2021-04-15 4:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Li Zhang
2021-04-15 4:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Li Zhang
2021-04-15 9:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] Support meter policy API Li Zhang
2021-04-15 9:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Li Zhang
2021-04-15 15:13 ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 12:34 ` Singh, Jasvinder
2021-04-19 16:13 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2021-04-15 9:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Li Zhang
2021-04-19 16:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Support meter policy API Jiawei Wang
2021-04-19 16:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Jiawei Wang
2021-04-20 11:18 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-20 12:55 ` Asaf Penso
2021-04-20 21:01 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-04-19 16:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Jiawei Wang
2021-04-20 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Support meter policy API Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 14:08 ` Jiawei(Jonny) Wang
2021-04-20 14:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 " Jiawei Wang
2021-04-20 14:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/2] ethdev: add pre-defined " Jiawei Wang
2021-04-20 17:12 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-21 19:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-22 1:29 ` Li Zhang
2021-04-20 14:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/2] app/testpmd: support policy actions per color Jiawei Wang
2021-04-20 17:14 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-21 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/2] Support meter policy API Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-20 17:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] [RFC]: ethdev: add pre-defined " Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-21 2:49 ` Li Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR12MB498712C16C8D778DCC806F8FD67E9@DM6PR12MB4987.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dekelp@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=lironh@marvell.com \
--cc=lizh@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=roniba@nvidia.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).