DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
To: Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil <asekhar@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
	Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
	Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	"Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda" <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Satheesh Paul Antonysamy <psatheesh@marvell.com>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>,
	"Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram" <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable compilation for non x86 arch
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:53:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MW5PR11MB5809B5302C61393E226A1DB8B8B59@MW5PR11MB5809.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR18MB4540C283713080B333697E29BFB39@CO1PR18MB4540.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

Yes you are right - 
Maybe with this way?

#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
 		vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_ARM64;
 #elif defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64)
 	if (vector_mode == IPSEC_MB_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
		/* Check CPU for supported vector instruction set */
 		if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F))
 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX512;
 		else if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX2))
 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX2;
 		else if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX))
 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX;
 		else
 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_SSE;
#else
		/* error return */
#endif

The only reason I suggest this is to avoid forgetting why it is implemented this way in the future...

Regards,
Fan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil <asekhar@marvell.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 7:38 AM
> To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Sunil Kumar Kori
> <skori@marvell.com>; Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
> <skoteshwar@marvell.com>; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
> <kirankumark@marvell.com>; Satheesh Paul Antonysamy
> <psatheesh@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Akhil Goyal
> <gakhil@marvell.com>; Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>; Nithin Kumar
> Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable compilation for non x86 arch
> 
> Hi Fan,
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion. However that will not work for ARM64.
> 
> Please note that the #defines RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F, RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX2
> and RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX are not available for ARM64. So the compilation will
> break.
> 
> I can introduce IPSEC_MB_ARM64, but still the current branch needs to be
> completely wrapped under #ifdef to avoid compilation failure.
> 
> Does the below code look OK ?
> 
> 	if (vector_mode == IPSEC_MB_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> #if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64)
> 		/* Check CPU for supported vector instruction set */
> 		if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F))
> 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX512;
> 		else if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX2))
> 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX2;
> 		else if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX))
> 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX;
> 		else
> 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_SSE;
> #elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> 		vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_ARM64;
> #else
> 		/* error return */
> #endif
> 	}
> 
> Ashwin Sekhar T K
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2022 7:10 PM
> > To: Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil <asekhar@marvell.com>;
> > dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Sunil Kumar Kori
> > <skori@marvell.com>; Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
> > <skoteshwar@marvell.com>; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> > <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
> > <kirankumark@marvell.com>; Satheesh Paul Antonysamy
> > <psatheesh@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Akhil
> > Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>; Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>; Nithin
> > Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> > <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> > Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable compilation for non x86
> > arch
> >
> > External Email
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for the explanation.
> > In that case I'd suggest instead of warping the branches completely with
> > macro, wrapping on the last "else" instead.
> > Something like
> >
> > 	if (vector_mode == IPSEC_MB_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> > 		/* Check CPU for supported vector instruction set */
> > 		if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F))
> > 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX512;
> > 		else if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX2))
> > 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX2;
> > 		else if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX))
> > 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_AVX;
> > 		else
> > #ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> > 			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_SSE;
> > #elif RTE_ARCH_ARM64 ?
> > 			Vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_ARM64; /* newly
> > introduced ARM vector mode */ #else
> > 			/* error return */
> > #endif
> > 	}
> >
> > This should also help setting RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_ARM_CE in device
> > feature flag bitmap later.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Fan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil <asekhar@marvell.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 11:34 AM
> > > To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Sunil Kumar Kori
> > > <skori@marvell.com>; Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
> > > <skoteshwar@marvell.com>; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> > > <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
> > > <kirankumark@marvell.com>; Satheesh Paul Antonysamy
> > > <psatheesh@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Akhil
> > > Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>; Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>; Nithin
> > > Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable compilation for non x86
> > > arch
> > >
> > > Hi Fan,
> > >
> > > There is an ARM64 port for IPSEC-MB
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > 3A__gitlab.arm.com_ar
> > > m-2Dreference-2D&d=DwIF-g&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=pYk-
> > QOhvnkU-_75y0
> > >
> > NKSn535ZotEGI_E69Py3Ppondk&m=hJ5ewsPh0KMcvMFylomkCk_hiNsuTm-
> > HfHad1UoQy
> > > K7MHqUyXvJSwSgyAQQThWyj&s=mL8bOzY63JQ-
> > 6CBhruqHv9bE5sEWT5PfXRFv4zbI6mw&
> > > e=
> > > solutions/ipsec-mb .
> > >
> > > When we compile DPDK with this IPSEC-MB port for ARM64, the
> > > vector_mode value doesn't matter.
> > >
> > > And the cpuflag #defines RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F, RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX2
> > etc.
> > > are not available in ARM64. So these need to be made x86 specific.
> > >
> > > Thank  you
> > > Ashwin
> > >
> > > Ashwin Sekhar T K
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 3:53 PM
> > > > To: Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil <asekhar@marvell.com>;
> > > > dev@dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Sunil Kumar Kori
> > > > <skori@marvell.com>; Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
> > > > <skoteshwar@marvell.com>; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> > > > <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
> > > > <kirankumark@marvell.com>; Satheesh Paul Antonysamy
> > > > <psatheesh@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>;
> > Akhil
> > > > Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>; Harman Kalra <hkalra@marvell.com>;
> > > > Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> > > > Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable compilation for
> > > > non x86 arch
> > > >
> > > > External Email
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > IPsec-mb PMD should not be built at all if the library is not installed.
> > > > Also, the code you are warping with macro only prevents initializing
> > > > the vector mode param to SSE which is later used to add feature flag
> > > > bits. To me this change does not make much sense.
> > > > Can you share with me the purpose of this change?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Fan
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Ashwin Sekhar T K <asekhar@marvell.com>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2022 5:21 PM
> > > > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > > > Cc: jerinj@marvell.com; skori@marvell.com; skoteshwar@marvell.com;
> > > > > pbhagavatula@marvell.com; kirankumark@marvell.com;
> > > > > psatheesh@marvell.com; asekhar@marvell.com; anoobj@marvell.com;
> > > > > gakhil@marvell.com; hkalra@marvell.com; ndabilpuram@marvell.com
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] crypto/ipsec_mb: enable compilation for non x86
> > > > > arch
> > > > >
> > > > > Enable compilation for non x86 architectures by conditionally
> > > > > compiling x86 specific code.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ashwin Sekhar T K <asekhar@marvell.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.c | 2 ++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.c
> > > > > b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.c
> > > > > index aab42c360c..9ea1110aaf 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.c
> > > > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ ipsec_mb_create(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev,
> > > > >  	const char *name, *args;
> > > > >  	int retval;
> > > > >
> > > > > +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> > > > >  	if (vector_mode == IPSEC_MB_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
> > > > >  		/* Check CPU for supported vector instruction set */
> > > > >  		if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_AVX512F))
> > > > > @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ ipsec_mb_create(struct rte_vdev_device *vdev,
> > > > >  		else
> > > > >  			vector_mode = IPSEC_MB_SSE;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > >
> > > > >  	init_params.private_data_size = sizeof(struct
> > > > ipsec_mb_dev_private) +
> > > > >  		pmd_data->internals_priv_size;
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-23  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10 16:21 Ashwin Sekhar T K
2022-06-17 10:23 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-06-17 10:33   ` Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil
2022-06-20 13:39     ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2022-06-21  6:38       ` Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil
2022-06-23  8:53         ` Zhang, Roy Fan [this message]
2022-06-23 13:26           ` Ashwin Sekhar Thalakalath Kottilveetil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MW5PR11MB5809B5302C61393E226A1DB8B8B59@MW5PR11MB5809.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=asekhar@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=psatheesh@marvell.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).