DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"wenzhuo.lu@intel.com" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"jingjing.wu@intel.com" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"bernard.iremonger@intel.com" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 05:27:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR05MB4224B4F96510DD45FFB0395DB6FF0@VI1PR05MB4224.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf16144c-6790-b62a-cdc5-824d4134a1b7@solarflare.com>

Thanks, PSB.

From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 5:12 PM
To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>; wenzhuo.lu@intel.com; jingjing.wu@intel.com; bernard.iremonger@intel.com; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria

On 10/11/18 1:49 PM, Dekel Peled wrote:

As described in [1], a new rte_flow item is added to support metadata

to use as flow rule match pattern.

The metadata is an opaque item, fully controlled by the application.



The use of metadata is relevant for egress rules only.

It can be set in the flow rule using the RTE_FLOW_ITEM_META.



An additional item 'tx_metadata' is added in union with existing member

'hash' of struct 'rte_mbuf'.

It is used to carry the metadata item.

Currently this union is used only for ingress packets, so using it for

egress metadata will not cause conflicts.



Application should set the packet metadata in the mbuf dedicated field,

and set the PKT_TX_METADATA flag in the mbuf->ol_flags.

The NIC will use the packet metadata as match criteria for relevant

flow rules.



This patch introduces metadata item type for rte_flow RTE_FLOW_ITEM_META,

along with corresponding struct rte_flow_item_meta and ol_flag

PKT_TX_METADATA.



[1] "[RFC,v2] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria"



Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com><mailto:dekelp@mellanox.com>

[...]



diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst

index b600b2d..8643722 100644

--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst

+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst

@@ -1191,6 +1191,27 @@ Normally preceded by any of:

 - `Item: ICMP6_ND_NS`_

 - `Item: ICMP6_ND_OPT`_



+Item: ``META``

+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

+

+Matches an application specific 32 bit metadata item.

+

+- Default ``mask`` matches any 32 bit value.

+

+.. _table_rte_flow_item_meta:

+

+.. table:: META

+

+   +----------+----------+---------------------------+

+   | Field    | Subfield | Value                     |

+   +==========+==========+===========================+

+   | ``spec`` | ``data`` | 32 bit metadata value     |

+   +----------+--------------------------------------+

+   | ``last`` | ``data`` | upper range value         |

+   +----------+----------+---------------------------+

+   | ``mask`` | ``data`` | zeroed to match any value |

+   +----------+----------+---------------------------+

+

Is there a difference between any metadata value and
no metadata value at all?


<DP> Value Zero is considered as no metadata value.


diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h

index 012577b..933f0e0 100644

--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h

+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h

@@ -942,6 +942,11 @@ struct rte_eth_conf {

  * for tunnel TSO.

  */

 #define DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_TNL_TSO       0x00080000

+/**

+ * Device supports match on metadata Tx offload..

+ * Application must set PKT_TX_METADATA and mbuf metadata field.

+ */

+#define DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA   0x00100000



 #define RTE_ETH_DEV_CAPA_RUNTIME_RX_QUEUE_SETUP 0x00000001

 /**< Device supports Rx queue setup after device started*/



diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h

index a50b05c..1fa38db 100644

--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h

+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h

@@ -182,6 +182,11 @@

 /* add new TX flags here */



 /**

+ * Indicate that the metadata field in the mbuf is in use.

+ */

+#define PKT_TX_METADATA       (1ULL << 41)

+

+/**

  * UDP Fragmentation Offload flag. This flag is used for enabling UDP

  * fragmentation in SW or in HW. When use UFO, mbuf->tso_segsz is used

  * to store the MSS of UDP fragments.

@@ -342,8 +347,9 @@

                PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT |        \

                PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT |        \

                PKT_TX_TUNNEL_MASK |    \

-               PKT_TX_MACSEC |         \

-               PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD)

+               PKT_TX_MACSEC |          \

+               PKT_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD |    \

+               PKT_TX_METADATA)



 /**

  * Mbuf having an external buffer attached. shinfo in mbuf must be filled.

@@ -511,28 +517,41 @@ struct rte_mbuf {

        /** VLAN TCI (CPU order), valid if PKT_RX_VLAN is set. */

        uint16_t vlan_tci;



+       RTE_STD_C11

        union {

-               uint32_t rss;     /**< RSS hash result if RSS enabled */

-               struct {

-                       RTE_STD_C11

-                       union {

-                              struct {

-                                      uint16_t hash;

-                                      uint16_t id;

+               union {

+                       uint32_t rss;     /**< RSS hash result if RSS enabled */

+                       struct {

+                              union {

+                                      struct {

+                                              uint16_t hash;

+                                             uint16_t id;

+                                      };

+                                      uint32_t lo;

+                                      /**< Second 4 flexible bytes */

                               };

+                              uint32_t hi;

+                              /**< First 4 flexible bytes or FD ID, dependent

+                               * on PKT_RX_FDIR_* flag in ol_flags.

+                               */

+                       } fdir; /**< Filter identifier if FDIR enabled */

+                       struct {

                               uint32_t lo;

-                              /**< Second 4 flexible bytes */

-                       };

-                       uint32_t hi;

-                       /**< First 4 flexible bytes or FD ID, dependent on

-                            PKT_RX_FDIR_* flag in ol_flags. */

-               } fdir;           /**< Filter identifier if FDIR enabled */

+                              uint32_t hi;

+                       } sched;          /**< Hierarchical scheduler */

+                       /**< User defined tags. See rte_distributor_process() */

+                       uint32_t usr;

+               } hash;                   /**< hash information */

                struct {

-                       uint32_t lo;

+                       /**

+                        * Application specific metadata value

+                        * for egress flow rule match.

+                        * Valid if PKT_TX_METADATA is set.

+                        */

Do I understand correctly that it is in CPU byte order?

<DP> Yes. The metadata value is not sent out to network.


+                       uint32_t tx_metadata;

                        uint32_t hi;

I don't know if we need 'hi' here. Right now only one thing is
important - make it clear that it is not used. May be name it 'reserved'
instead of 'hi'.

<DP> Accepted, I will rename it.

It is interesting that hash::sched::hi is used for TxQ identification
in rte_event_eth_tx. The patch uses low bytes. So, seem to be fine.
However, if the separate structure is added in union for Tx fields,
it looks strange taking  rte_event_eth_tx into account.
So, I think it would be good document (comments) the purpose
of separate but unnamed structure in the union.

<DP> Accepted, I will add comment.

Andrew.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-17  5:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-16 13:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Dekel Peled
2018-09-16 13:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] app/testpmd: " Dekel Peled
2018-09-16 13:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app/testpmd: add debug command tx_metadata set <port-id> <value> Dekel Peled
2018-09-16 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Dekel Peled
2018-09-27 13:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] support meadata as flow rule criteria Dekel Peled
2018-10-03 20:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-11 10:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Dekel Peled
2018-10-16  8:42       ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-10-17 12:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] support metadata " Dekel Peled
2018-10-21 14:22         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Dekel Peled
2018-10-22 16:14           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-21 14:22         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: " Dekel Peled
2018-10-21 14:22         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] app/testpmd: support metadata as flow rule item Dekel Peled
2018-10-22 16:13           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-17 12:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria Dekel Peled
2018-10-17 14:04         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 12:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] app/testpmd: support metadata as flow rule item Dekel Peled
2018-10-18 12:26         ` Ori Kam
2018-10-21 13:49           ` Dekel Peled
2018-10-17 12:03       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] app/testpmd: add Tx metadata debug commands Dekel Peled
2018-10-18  7:56         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-18  8:30           ` Dekel Peled
2018-10-11 10:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria Dekel Peled
2018-10-16 14:11       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17  5:27         ` Dekel Peled [this message]
2018-10-17  6:02           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17  7:52             ` Dekel Peled
2018-10-11 10:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: " Dekel Peled
2018-10-11 10:49     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] app/testpmd: add Tx metadata debug commands Dekel Peled
2018-09-27 13:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria Dekel Peled
2018-10-05 13:31     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-05 13:39       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-05 18:20         ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-08 15:10         ` Dekel Peled
2018-10-09 14:46         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-09 14:52           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-27 13:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: " Dekel Peled
2018-09-27 13:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] app/testpmd: add debug command Tx metadata set Dekel Peled
2018-10-05 13:27     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-16 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] ethdev: support metadata as flow rule criteria Dekel Peled
2018-09-18  7:55   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2018-09-16 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] app/testpmd: " Dekel Peled
2018-09-18  8:21   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2018-09-25 11:32     ` Dekel Peled
2018-09-16 14:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] app/testpmd: add debug command Tx metadata set Dekel Peled
2018-09-19  5:39   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2018-10-05 13:19   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-09 14:30     ` Dekel Peled

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR05MB4224B4F96510DD45FFB0395DB6FF0@VI1PR05MB4224.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=dekelp@mellanox.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).