From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal/arm: fix gcc build for optimization level 0
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:05:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0802MB2351B1966A87247A150AC91D9EF80@VI1PR0802MB2351.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8yP0YaCAAMVJFDNNw8Hwos2eEMuNyCu=zVeQMgz40xcNg@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 5:45 PM
> To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Andrew Rybchenko
> <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>; jerinj@marvell.com; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; nd
> <nd@arm.com>; Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal/arm: fix gcc build for optimization
> level 0
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:34 AM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:56 PM David Marchand
> > <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:51 AM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:09 PM David Marchand
> > > > <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 9:10 AM Ruifeng Wang
> <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gcc build with '-O0' on platforms with
> RTE_ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS
> > > > > > set failed for:
> > > > > > ../lib/librte_efd/rte_efd.c
> > > > > > Assembler messages:
> > > > > > 3866: Error: selected processor does not support `crc32cb w0,w0,w1'
> > > > > > 3890: Error: selected processor does not support `crc32ch w0,w0,w1'
> > > > > > 3914: Error: selected processor does not support `crc32cw
> w0,w0,w1'
> > > > > > 3938: Error: selected processor does not support `crc32cx w0,w0,x1'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This was caused by an architecture specifier added for Clang.
> > > > > > Unlike Clang, Gcc considers each inline assembly block to be
> > > > > > dependent and therefor, the architecture specifier impacts
> > > > > > assemble of some blocks require certain extension support.
> > > > >
> > > > > I reproduced this error with -O0 for
> config/arm/arm64_octeontx2_linux_gcc.
> > > > > The patch looks simple enough and it only affects ARM builds.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jerin,
> > > > > Are you okay with this change for 20.11?
> > > > > Or should we wait 21.02?
> > > >
> > > > I could reproduce the issue with meson build -Dbuildtype=debug
> > > > --cross-file config/arm/arm64_octeontx2_linux_gcc
> > > >
> > > > This fix is OK. Request to merge for 20.11
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > >
> > > Ruifeng, Andrew,
> > >
> > > I get a compilation error with this patch on sfc using gcc and
> > > config/arm/arm64_octeontx2_linux_gcc config + --buildtype=debug
> > > and/or
> > > -Dc_args=-O0 .
> > >
> > > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (GNU Toolchain for the A-profile Architecture
> > > 8.2-2019.01 (arm-rel-8.28)) 8.2.1 20180802
> > >
> > > FAILED:
> > > drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_crc32.c.o
> > > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
> > > -Idrivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta
> > > -Idrivers/common/sfc_efx/base
> > > -I../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base
> > > -Idrivers/common/sfc_efx -I../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx -I.
> > > -I../../dpdk/ -Iconfig -I../../dpdk/config -Ilib/librte_eal/include
> > > -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/include -Ilib/librte_eal/linux/include
> > > -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linux/include
> > > -Ilib/librte_eal/arm/include -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include
> > > -Ilib/librte_eal/common -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common
> > > -Ilib/librte_eal -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal -Ilib/librte_kvargs
> > > -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_kvargs
> > > -Ilib/librte_telemetry/../librte_metrics
> > > -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_telemetry/../librte_metrics
> > > -Ilib/librte_telemetry -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_telemetry
> > > -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall
> > > -Winvalid-pch -Werror -g -include rte_config.h -Wextra -Wcast-qual
> > > -Wdeprecated -Wformat -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security
> > > -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs
> > > -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare
> > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wno-packed-not-aligned
> > > -Wno-missing-field-initializers -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC
> > > -march=armv8.2-a+crc+crypto+lse -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API
> > > -DALLOW_INTERNAL_API -Wno-format-truncation -Wdisabled-
> optimization
> > > -Waggregate-return -Wbad-function-cast -Wno-sign-compare
> > > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-empty-body
> > > -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -MD -MQ
> > > 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_crc32.c.o'
> > > -MF
> > >
> 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_crc32.c.o.d'
> > > -o
> 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_crc32.c.o'
> > > -c ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_crc32.c
> > > In file included from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic.h:9,
> > > from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h:19,
> > > from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h:19,
> > > from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_pause.h:13,
> > > from
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h:25,
> > > from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_spinlock.h:17,
> > > from ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/efsys.h:15,
> > > from ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h:11,
> > > from ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_crc32.c:7:
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h: In function
> > > ‘__cas_128_relaxed’:
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:81:20: error:
> > > function returns an aggregate [-Werror=aggregate-return]
> > > __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_relaxed, "casp")
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:57:1: note: in
> > > definition of macro ‘__ATOMIC128_CAS_OP’
> > > cas_op_name(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t old, rte_int128_t updated)
> \
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h: In function
> > > ‘__cas_128_acquire’:
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:82:20: error:
> > > function returns an aggregate [-Werror=aggregate-return]
> > > __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_acquire, "caspa")
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:57:1: note: in
> > > definition of macro ‘__ATOMIC128_CAS_OP’
> > > cas_op_name(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t old, rte_int128_t updated)
> \
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h: In function
> > > ‘__cas_128_release’:
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:83:20: error:
> > > function returns an aggregate [-Werror=aggregate-return]
> > > __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_release, "caspl")
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:57:1: note: in
> > > definition of macro ‘__ATOMIC128_CAS_OP’
> > > cas_op_name(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t old, rte_int128_t updated)
> \
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h: In function
> > > ‘__cas_128_acq_rel’:
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:84:20: error:
> > > function returns an aggregate [-Werror=aggregate-return]
> > > __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_acq_rel, "caspal")
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:57:1: note: in
> > > definition of macro ‘__ATOMIC128_CAS_OP’
> > > cas_op_name(rte_int128_t *dst, rte_int128_t old, rte_int128_t updated)
> \
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >
> > >
> > > If I waive those warnings:
> > > - next to fail is net/igc (fixed by next patch so ok)
> > > - and then next to fail is net/sfc.
> >
> > Regarding the net/sfc build, Could try clean build.(I got the warning
> > first, after the clean build, it is OK)
>
> That's what I first thought too, then I noticed that test-meson-builds.sh had
> switched back my build dir to debugoptimized.
>
>
> From scratch:
>
> The Meson build system
> Version: 0.52.0
> Source dir: /home/dmarchan/dpdk
> Build dir: /home/dmarchan/builds/build-arm64-octeontx2
> Build type: cross build
> Program cat found: YES (/usr/bin/cat)
> Project name: DPDK
> Project version: 20.11.0-rc5
> Appending CFLAGS from environment: '-Werror'
> C compiler for the build machine: ccache gcc (gcc 9.3.1 "gcc (GCC)
> 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2)")
> C linker for the build machine: GNU ld.bfd 2.32-33 C compiler for the host
> machine: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (gcc 8.2.1 "aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (GNU
> Toolchain for the A-profile Architecture
> 8.2-2019.01 (arm-rel-8.28)) 8.2.1 20180802") C linker for the host machine:
> GNU ld.bfd 8.2-2019 Build machine cpu family: x86_64 Build machine cpu:
> x86_64 Host machine cpu family: aarch64 Host machine cpu: armv8-a Target
> machine cpu family: aarch64 Target machine cpu: armv8-a ...
> Option buildtype is: debug [default: release] Option default_library is: shared
> [default: static] Found ninja-1.9.0 at /usr/bin/ninja
> ninja: Entering directory `/home/dmarchan/builds/build-arm64-octeontx2'
> [479/2558] Compiling C object
> 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_bootcfg.c.o'.
> FAILED:
> drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_bootcfg.c.o
> aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
> -Idrivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta
> -Idrivers/common/sfc_efx/base -I../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base
> -Idrivers/common/sfc_efx -I../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx -I.
> -I../../dpdk/ -Iconfig -I../../dpdk/config -Ilib/librte_eal/include -
> I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/include -Ilib/librte_eal/linux/include -
> I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/linux/include -Ilib/librte_eal/arm/include -
> I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include -Ilib/librte_eal/common -
> I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common -Ilib/librte_eal -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal -
> Ilib/librte_kvargs -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_kvargs -
> Ilib/librte_telemetry/../librte_metrics
> -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_telemetry/../librte_metrics
> -Ilib/librte_telemetry -I../../dpdk/lib/librte_telemetry -fdiagnostics-
> color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -g -
> include rte_config.h -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wdeprecated -Wformat -
> Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-
> prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -
> Wsign-compare -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wno-packed-
> not-aligned -Wno-missing-field-initializers -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -
> march=armv8.2-a+crc+crypto+lse -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API -
> DALLOW_INTERNAL_API -Wno-format-truncation -Wdisabled-optimization -
> Waggregate-return -Wbad-function-cast -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused-
> parameter -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-empty-body -Wno-unused-but-set-
> variable -MD -MQ
> 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_bootcfg.c.o'
> -MF
> 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_bootcfg.c.o.
> d'
> -o
> 'drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/932d09a@@sfc_base@sta/efx_bootcfg.c.o'
> -c ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_bootcfg.c
> In file included from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic.h:9,
> from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_pause.h:19,
> from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_pause_64.h:19,
> from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_pause.h:13,
> from
> ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h:25,
> from ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_spinlock.h:17,
> from ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/efsys.h:15,
> from ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h:11,
> from ../../dpdk/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_bootcfg.c:7:
> ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h: In function
> ‘__cas_128_relaxed’:
> ../../dpdk/lib/librte_eal/arm/include/rte_atomic_64.h:81:20: error:
> function returns an aggregate [-Werror=aggregate-return]
> __ATOMIC128_CAS_OP(__cas_128_relaxed, "casp") ...
I can see similar warning message (function returns an aggregate) when doing "-O0" build.
Since "-Werror=aggregate-return" is used, error will be reported.
This is because '__cas_128_xxx' return aggregated data type I think.
Inline the functions should resolve the issue. But it could cause register corruption as discussed
when the code was added:
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/55580/
No quick solution I can think of.
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-27 8:09 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] gcc build fix Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal/arm: fix gcc build for optimization level 0 Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 8:39 ` David Marchand
2020-11-27 8:51 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-27 9:25 ` David Marchand
2020-11-27 9:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-27 9:45 ` David Marchand
2020-11-27 10:05 ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2020-11-27 10:28 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-27 9:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-11-27 9:36 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 8:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/igc: " Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 8:53 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-11-27 9:02 ` David Marchand
2020-11-27 12:13 ` David Marchand
2020-11-27 14:50 ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-11-27 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] gcc build fix Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal/arm: fix gcc build for optimization level 0 Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 13:03 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/igc: " Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 13:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] gcc build fix Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-27 14:08 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-11-27 16:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR0802MB2351B1966A87247A150AC91D9EF80@VI1PR0802MB2351.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).