From: "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@intel.com> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>, "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@redhat.com>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, "Rong, Leyi" <leyi.rong@intel.com>, "Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>, "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>, Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>, "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] net/ixgbe: fix UDP zero checksum error Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 01:12:39 +0000 Message-ID: <BN8PR11MB379556D02AEB5667BD37FA76F7749@BN8PR11MB3795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8yBNOHuBgSAm+6JNqY_0dN4THyr75JC-q1UJVmAZWokdw@mail.gmail.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 19:54 > To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> > Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@redhat.com>; Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Rong, > Leyi <leyi.rong@intel.com>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>; Guo, Jia > <jia.guo@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin > <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon > <thomas@monjalon.net>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] net/ixgbe: fix UDP zero checksum error > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:54 AM David Marchand > <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Haiyue, > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:56 PM Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > There is an 82599 errata that UDP frames with a zero checksum are > > > incorrectly marked as checksum invalid by the hardware. This was > > > leading to misleading PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD flag. > > > > > > This patch changes the bad UDP checksum to PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN, > > > so the software application will then have to recompute the checksum > > > itself if needed. > > > > > > Bugzilla ID: 629 > > > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > Reported-by: Paolo Valerio <pvalerio@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@intel.com> > > > > There was a previous mention of this issue in the past and it resulted > > in dropping part of the hw statistics. > > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=256ff05a9cae7484e2197cde4401dfa1f21d5a6f > > > > Does it make sense to restrict this "fix" to 82599 only? Make sense. > > ping. > > > -- > David Marchand
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 1:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-02 7:06 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1] net/ixgbe: adjust error for UDP with zero checksum Haiyue Wang 2021-02-02 9:45 ` David Marchand 2021-02-02 12:42 ` Wang, Haiyue 2021-02-02 12:53 ` David Marchand 2021-02-02 12:56 ` Wang, Haiyue 2021-02-02 14:28 ` Wang, Haiyue 2021-02-02 17:42 ` Paolo Valerio 2021-02-02 12:54 ` Wang, Haiyue 2021-02-03 2:19 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix UDP zero checksum error Haiyue Wang 2021-02-03 8:07 ` Zhang, Qi Z 2021-02-03 8:32 ` David Marchand 2021-02-04 7:45 ` Zhang, Qi Z 2021-02-04 14:39 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Haiyue Wang 2021-02-05 17:50 ` Paolo Valerio 2021-02-07 18:40 ` Paolo Valerio 2021-02-08 13:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 2021-02-09 1:23 ` Zhang, Qi Z 2021-02-25 10:54 ` David Marchand 2021-04-07 11:53 ` David Marchand 2021-04-08 1:12 ` Wang, Haiyue [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=BN8PR11MB379556D02AEB5667BD37FA76F7749@BN8PR11MB3795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \ --to=haiyue.wang@intel.com \ --cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \ --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \ --cc=aconole@redhat.com \ --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \ --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \ --cc=dev@dpdk.org \ --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \ --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \ --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \ --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \ --cc=leyi.rong@intel.com \ --cc=lijuan.tu@intel.com \ --cc=pvalerio@redhat.com \ --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \ --cc=stable@dpdk.org \ --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
patches for DPDK stable branches This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \ stable@dpdk.org public-inbox-index stable Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git