DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
@ 2021-01-13  8:26 Jiang, Cheng1
  2021-01-13 14:11 ` Aaron Conole
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiang, Cheng1 @ 2021-01-13  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ci; +Cc: Xia, Chenbo

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 295 bytes --]

Hi,

I'm an engineer from DPDK project.
I've sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem.
Here is the link:
http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/

Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks.
Cheng

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2348 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
  2021-01-13  8:26 [dpdk-ci] CI work status check Jiang, Cheng1
@ 2021-01-13 14:11 ` Aaron Conole
  2021-01-14  2:23   ` Jiang, Cheng1
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Conole @ 2021-01-13 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang\, Cheng1; +Cc: ci\, Xia\, Chenbo

"Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
>
> I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made any progress for more than a day, so I
> want to ask if there is a problem.

From the 0day robot, I see the following error:

  error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
  error: could not build fake ancestor
  hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
  Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
  When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
  If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
  To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

So, looks like it didn't apply.  Which tree is this based on?

> Here is the link:
>
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
>
>  
>
> Looking forward to your reply.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheng


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
  2021-01-13 14:11 ` Aaron Conole
@ 2021-01-14  2:23   ` Jiang, Cheng1
  2021-01-14 15:38     ` Aaron Conole
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiang, Cheng1 @ 2021-01-14  2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aaron Conole; +Cc: ci, Xia, Chenbo, Hu, Jiayu, Yang, YvonneX

Hi,

Thanks a lot.
This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my environment.
It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
> 
> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
> >
> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made
> > any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem.
> 
> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
> 
>   error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
>   error: could not build fake ancestor
>   hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
>   Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
>   When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
>   If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
>   To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> 
> So, looks like it didn't apply.  Which tree is this based on?
> 
> > Here is the link:
> >
> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Cheng


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
  2021-01-14  2:23   ` Jiang, Cheng1
@ 2021-01-14 15:38     ` Aaron Conole
  2021-01-15  2:03       ` Jiang, Cheng1
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Conole @ 2021-01-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiang\, Cheng1; +Cc: ci\, Xia\, Chenbo, Hu\, Jiayu, Yang\, YvonneX

"Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot.
> This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my environment.
> It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be
> applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.

I guess that's probably what happened here.  The DPDK 0-day robot has
difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against.  Nothing
'wrong' here on your side.  I will look at this closer and see if I can
get it working better.

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
>> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
>> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
>> 
>> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
>> >
>> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made
>> > any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem.
>> 
>> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
>> 
>>   error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
>>   error: could not build fake ancestor
>>   hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
>>   Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
>>   When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
>>   If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
>>   To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
>> 
>> So, looks like it didn't apply.  Which tree is this based on?
>> 
>> > Here is the link:
>> >
>> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking forward to your reply.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > Cheng


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
  2021-01-14 15:38     ` Aaron Conole
@ 2021-01-15  2:03       ` Jiang, Cheng1
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiang, Cheng1 @ 2021-01-15  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aaron Conole; +Cc: ci, Xia, Chenbo, Hu, Jiayu, Yang, YvonneX

Sure, thanks a lot.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 11:38 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Hu, Jiayu
> <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
> 
> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> > This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my
> environment.
> > It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be
> > applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.
> 
> I guess that's probably what happened here.  The DPDK 0-day robot has
> difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against.  Nothing 'wrong'
> here on your side.  I will look at this closer and see if I can get it working
> better.
> 
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
> >> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
> >>
> >> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
> >> >
> >> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not
> >> > made any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a
> problem.
> >>
> >> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
> >>
> >>   error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
> >>   error: could not build fake ancestor
> >>   hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> >>   Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
> >>   When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> >>   If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> >>   To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> >>
> >> So, looks like it didn't apply.  Which tree is this based on?
> >>
> >> > Here is the link:
> >> >
> >> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Looking forward to your reply.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Cheng


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-15  2:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-13  8:26 [dpdk-ci] CI work status check Jiang, Cheng1
2021-01-13 14:11 ` Aaron Conole
2021-01-14  2:23   ` Jiang, Cheng1
2021-01-14 15:38     ` Aaron Conole
2021-01-15  2:03       ` Jiang, Cheng1

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
		ci@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.ci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git