DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	 Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	 Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>,
	 Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ethdev: deprecate header fields and metadata flow actions
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:33:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOBf=mtkQgJQxYbsBkCGtZgng+APrq8zHRHwSJsLkFk9OPp1iw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e5753c9-85c3-1dc1-69d8-460cb0a7b5a4@intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/24/2021 3:37 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> > The generic RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MODIFY_FIELD action was
> > introduced by [1]. This action provides an unified way
> > to perform various arithmetic and transfer operations over
> > packet network header fields and packet metadata.
> >
> > [1] commit 641dbe4fb053 ("net/mlx5: support modify field flow action")
> >
> > On other side there are a bunch of multiple legacy actions,
> > that can be superseded by the generic modify field action:
> >
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_MPLS_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_DEC_MPLS_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_NW_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_DEC_NW_TTL      sfc
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_COPY_TTL_OUT
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_COPY_TTL_IN
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC       bnxt, cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST       bnxt, cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC       cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST       cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC         cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST         cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DEC_TTL            mlx5, sfc
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TTL            mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_MAC_SRC        cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_MAC_DST        cxgbe, mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INC_TCP_SEQ        mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DEC_TCP_SEQ        mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INC_TCP_ACK        mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DEC_TCP_ACK        mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DSCP      mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DSCP      mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_VID    bnxt, cnxk, cxgbe, enic,
> >                                          mlx5, octeontx2, sfc
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP    bnxt, cnxk, cxgbe, enic,
> >                                          mlx5, octeontx2, sfc
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TAG            mlx5
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META           mlx5
> >
> > This note deprecates the following RTE Flow actions:
> > 1. As not supported by any of PMDs:
> >
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_MPLS_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_DEC_MPLS_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_NW_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_COPY_TTL_OUT
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_COPY_TTL_IN
> >
> > 2. As supposed to be replaced by generig field modify action:
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_DEC_NW_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DEC_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TTL
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_MAC_SRC
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_MAC_DST
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INC_TCP_SEQ
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DEC_TCP_SEQ
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INC_TCP_ACK
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DEC_TCP_ACK
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DSCP
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DSCP
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TAG
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META
> >
> > The VLAN set actions are interrelated to VLAN header insertion/removal
> > and supported by multiple PMDs and supposed to be just deprecated but
> > not be removed in 22.11.
> >
>
> Why not remove them for v22.11? Do you think PMDs can't change the
> existing implementation until 22.11?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> >
> > --
> > v2  - deprecation.rst is updated
> > v3  - doc comments addressed
> >      - commit message comments addressed
> >      - SET_VLAN_VID and SET_VLAN_PCP actions deprecated, but will not
> >        be removed in 22.11
>
> Deprecated symbols are to prevent new code using them, but for this case
> there is no alternative, since PMDs still don't support
> 'RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MODIFY_FIELD' yet.
> This patch is forcing users to use deprecated actions (except from mlx).
>
> What about a slight change:
> 1- In this release, update header/document as 'RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MODIFY_FIELD'
>     is preferred way if supported. Instead of deprecating old ones.
>
> 2- Have an agreement with PMD maintainers to switch to new action before v22.11,
>     and don't accept old action implementation in PMDs anymore.
>     Based on agreement update 'deprecation.rst' in this release to note that
>     old actions will be removed on v22.11.
>     (It would be good to have a check to prevent old actions merged during that time.)
>
> 3- In v22.11, remove old actions, the PMDs that don't support MODIFY_FIELD
>     action will lose the feature.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Andrew, Ajit, Somnath, Rahul,
>
> We need your confirmation for item (2) above, do you have any objection?
I'm okay with item (2) i.e have an agreement to switch to the new
action by 22.11

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23  7:59 [PATCH] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-24  8:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-24 14:56   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 15:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-24 15:59   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 16:21   ` Ori Kam
2021-11-24 16:37     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-24 17:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-24 18:09         ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 11:53   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:03     ` Somnath Kotur [this message]
2021-11-25 13:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-25 14:13       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-25 14:40         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 14:52           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-25 14:15       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 13:56     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-11-25 15:14       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 15:53         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-25 12:18   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:29     ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 12:46       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 13:56         ` Ori Kam
2021-11-25 14:28           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:31   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-25 12:50     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-26  9:51 ` [PATCH v4] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-11-26 12:53   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-26 13:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-26 14:52       ` Olivier Matz
2021-11-26 17:07         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOBf=mtkQgJQxYbsBkCGtZgng+APrq8zHRHwSJsLkFk9OPp1iw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).