patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
@ 2023-04-11  7:40 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
  2023-04-18  6:23 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan @ 2023-04-11  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: anoobj, Xueming Li, Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan

[ upstream commit 76618fc4bef616f16b6c92f15681ea080eabb486 ]

Fix the order of ECFPM parameters according to target board.

Fixes: 8e39b133235 ("crypto/cnxk: support fixed point multiplication")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
index adf719da73..f1183376d0 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static __rte_always_inline int
 cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
 		   struct roc_ae_buf_ptr *meta_buf, uint64_t *fpm_iova,
 		   struct roc_ae_ec_group *ec_grp, uint8_t curveid,
-		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst)
+		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst, int cpt_ver)
 {
 	uint16_t scalar_align, p_align;
 	uint16_t dlen, prime_len;
@@ -697,26 +697,33 @@ cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
 	scalar_align = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(ecpm->scalar.length, 8);
 
 	/*
-	 * Set dlen = sum(ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates), prime,
-	 * scalar length),
+	 * Set dlen = sum(prime, scalar length, table address and
+	 * optionally ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates)).
 	 * Please note point length is equivalent to prime of the curve
 	 */
-	dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
-
-	memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
-
-	*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
-	dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
-
-	/* Copy scalar, prime */
-	memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
-	dptr += scalar_align;
-	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
-	dptr += p_align;
-	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
-	dptr += p_align;
-	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
-	dptr += p_align;
+	if (cpt_ver == ROC_CPT_REVISION_ID_96XX_C0) {
+		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
+		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
+		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
+		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
+		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
+		dptr += scalar_align;
+		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
+		dptr += p_align;
+		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
+		dptr += p_align;
+		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
+		dptr += p_align;
+	} else {
+		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + p_align + scalar_align;
+		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
+		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
+		dptr += scalar_align;
+		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
+		dptr += p_align;
+		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
+		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
+	}
 
 	/* Setup opcodes */
 	w4.s.opcode_major = ROC_AE_MAJOR_OP_ECC;
@@ -947,7 +954,8 @@ cnxk_ae_enqueue(struct cnxk_cpt_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op *op,
 		ret = cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(&asym_op->ecpm, &meta_buf,
 					 sess->cnxk_fpm_iova,
 					 sess->ec_grp[sess->ec_ctx.curveid],
-					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst);
+					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst,
+					 sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
 		if (unlikely(ret))
 			goto req_fail;
 		break;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
  2023-04-11  7:40 [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
@ 2023-04-18  6:23 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
  2023-04-18 11:22   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xueming(Steven) Li @ 2023-04-18  6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan, stable; +Cc: anoobj

Thanks, patch applied.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: 4/11/2023 15:41
> To: stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: anoobj@marvell.com; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>;
> Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> 
> [ upstream commit 76618fc4bef616f16b6c92f15681ea080eabb486 ]
> 
> Fix the order of ECFPM parameters according to target board.
> 
> Fixes: 8e39b133235 ("crypto/cnxk: support fixed point multiplication")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> index adf719da73..f1183376d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static __rte_always_inline int
> cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
>  		   struct roc_ae_buf_ptr *meta_buf, uint64_t *fpm_iova,
>  		   struct roc_ae_ec_group *ec_grp, uint8_t curveid,
> -		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst)
> +		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst, int cpt_ver)
>  {
>  	uint16_t scalar_align, p_align;
>  	uint16_t dlen, prime_len;
> @@ -697,26 +697,33 @@ cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct
> rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
>  	scalar_align = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(ecpm->scalar.length, 8);
> 
>  	/*
> -	 * Set dlen = sum(ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates), prime,
> -	 * scalar length),
> +	 * Set dlen = sum(prime, scalar length, table address and
> +	 * optionally ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates)).
>  	 * Please note point length is equivalent to prime of the curve
>  	 */
> -	dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> -
> -	memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> -
> -	*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> -	dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> -
> -	/* Copy scalar, prime */
> -	memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> -	dptr += scalar_align;
> -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> -	dptr += p_align;
> -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> -	dptr += p_align;
> -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> -	dptr += p_align;
> +	if (cpt_ver == ROC_CPT_REVISION_ID_96XX_C0) {
> +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> +		dptr += scalar_align;
> +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> +		dptr += p_align;
> +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> +		dptr += p_align;
> +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> +		dptr += p_align;
> +	} else {
> +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + p_align + scalar_align;
> +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> +		dptr += scalar_align;
> +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> +		dptr += p_align;
> +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> +	}
> 
>  	/* Setup opcodes */
>  	w4.s.opcode_major = ROC_AE_MAJOR_OP_ECC; @@ -947,7 +954,8
> @@ cnxk_ae_enqueue(struct cnxk_cpt_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op *op,
>  		ret = cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(&asym_op->ecpm, &meta_buf,
>  					 sess->cnxk_fpm_iova,
>  					 sess->ec_grp[sess->ec_ctx.curveid],
> -					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst);
> +					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst,
> +					 sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
>  		if (unlikely(ret))
>  			goto req_fail;
>  		break;
> --
> 2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
  2023-04-18  6:23 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
@ 2023-04-18 11:22   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
  2023-04-18 12:19     ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xueming(Steven) Li @ 2023-04-18 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan, stable; +Cc: anoobj

There is a compilation error:

In file included from ../../../auto/mtbcswgwork/xuemingl/workspace/dpdk/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cn9k_cryptodev_ops.c:15:
../../../auto/mtbcswgwork/xuemingl/workspace/dpdk/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h:958:13: error: no member named 'lf' in 'struct cnxk_ae_sess'
                                         sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
                                         ~~~~  ^

Please provide a new version if we do need it for 22.11 LTS.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> Sent: 4/18/2023 14:23
> To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: anoobj@marvell.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> 
> Thanks, patch applied.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > Sent: 4/11/2023 15:41
> > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: anoobj@marvell.com; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>;
> > Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> >
> > [ upstream commit 76618fc4bef616f16b6c92f15681ea080eabb486 ]
> >
> > Fix the order of ECFPM parameters according to target board.
> >
> > Fixes: 8e39b133235 ("crypto/cnxk: support fixed point multiplication")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h | 48
> > ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h index adf719da73..f1183376d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static __rte_always_inline int
> > cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
> >  		   struct roc_ae_buf_ptr *meta_buf, uint64_t *fpm_iova,
> >  		   struct roc_ae_ec_group *ec_grp, uint8_t curveid,
> > -		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst)
> > +		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst, int cpt_ver)
> >  {
> >  	uint16_t scalar_align, p_align;
> >  	uint16_t dlen, prime_len;
> > @@ -697,26 +697,33 @@ cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct
> > rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
> >  	scalar_align = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(ecpm->scalar.length, 8);
> >
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Set dlen = sum(ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates), prime,
> > -	 * scalar length),
> > +	 * Set dlen = sum(prime, scalar length, table address and
> > +	 * optionally ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates)).
> >  	 * Please note point length is equivalent to prime of the curve
> >  	 */
> > -	dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> > -
> > -	memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > -
> > -	*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > -	dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > -
> > -	/* Copy scalar, prime */
> > -	memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > -	dptr += scalar_align;
> > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > -	dptr += p_align;
> > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> > -	dptr += p_align;
> > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> > -	dptr += p_align;
> > +	if (cpt_ver == ROC_CPT_REVISION_ID_96XX_C0) {
> > +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> > +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > +		dptr += scalar_align;
> > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > +		dptr += p_align;
> > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> > +		dptr += p_align;
> > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> > +		dptr += p_align;
> > +	} else {
> > +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + p_align + scalar_align;
> > +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > +		dptr += scalar_align;
> > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > +		dptr += p_align;
> > +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > +	}
> >
> >  	/* Setup opcodes */
> >  	w4.s.opcode_major = ROC_AE_MAJOR_OP_ECC; @@ -947,7 +954,8
> @@
> > cnxk_ae_enqueue(struct cnxk_cpt_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op *op,
> >  		ret = cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(&asym_op->ecpm, &meta_buf,
> >  					 sess->cnxk_fpm_iova,
> >  					 sess->ec_grp[sess->ec_ctx.curveid],
> > -					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst);
> > +					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst,
> > +					 sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
> >  		if (unlikely(ret))
> >  			goto req_fail;
> >  		break;
> > --
> > 2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
  2023-04-18 11:22   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
@ 2023-04-18 12:19     ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
  2023-04-18 12:38       ` Xueming(Steven) Li
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan @ 2023-04-18 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xueming(Steven) Li, stable; +Cc: Anoob Joseph

Hi,
Please drop this patch as we would not need this fix for 22.11.2.

Thanks,
Gowrishankar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4:52 PM
> To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> There is a compilation error:
> 
> In file included from
> ../../../auto/mtbcswgwork/xuemingl/workspace/dpdk/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cn9k
> _cryptodev_ops.c:15:
> ../../../auto/mtbcswgwork/xuemingl/workspace/dpdk/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk
> _ae.h:958:13: error: no member named 'lf' in 'struct cnxk_ae_sess'
>                                          sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
>                                          ~~~~  ^
> 
> Please provide a new version if we do need it for 22.11 LTS.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: 4/18/2023 14:23
> > To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: anoobj@marvell.com
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> >
> > Thanks, patch applied.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > > Sent: 4/11/2023 15:41
> > > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: anoobj@marvell.com; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>;
> > > Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> > >
> > > [ upstream commit 76618fc4bef616f16b6c92f15681ea080eabb486 ]
> > >
> > > Fix the order of ECFPM parameters according to target board.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 8e39b133235 ("crypto/cnxk: support fixed point
> > > multiplication")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h | 48
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > > b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h index adf719da73..f1183376d0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > > @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static __rte_always_inline int
> > > cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
> > >  		   struct roc_ae_buf_ptr *meta_buf, uint64_t *fpm_iova,
> > >  		   struct roc_ae_ec_group *ec_grp, uint8_t curveid,
> > > -		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst)
> > > +		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst, int cpt_ver)
> > >  {
> > >  	uint16_t scalar_align, p_align;
> > >  	uint16_t dlen, prime_len;
> > > @@ -697,26 +697,33 @@ cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct
> > > rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
> > >  	scalar_align = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(ecpm->scalar.length, 8);
> > >
> > >  	/*
> > > -	 * Set dlen = sum(ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates), prime,
> > > -	 * scalar length),
> > > +	 * Set dlen = sum(prime, scalar length, table address and
> > > +	 * optionally ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates)).
> > >  	 * Please note point length is equivalent to prime of the curve
> > >  	 */
> > > -	dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> > > -
> > > -	memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > > -
> > > -	*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > > -	dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > > -
> > > -	/* Copy scalar, prime */
> > > -	memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > > -	dptr += scalar_align;
> > > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > > -	dptr += p_align;
> > > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> > > -	dptr += p_align;
> > > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> > > -	dptr += p_align;
> > > +	if (cpt_ver == ROC_CPT_REVISION_ID_96XX_C0) {
> > > +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> > > +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > > +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > > +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > > +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > > +		dptr += scalar_align;
> > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + p_align + scalar_align;
> > > +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > > +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > > +		dptr += scalar_align;
> > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > > +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > > +	}
> > >
> > >  	/* Setup opcodes */
> > >  	w4.s.opcode_major = ROC_AE_MAJOR_OP_ECC; @@ -947,7 +954,8
> > @@
> > > cnxk_ae_enqueue(struct cnxk_cpt_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op *op,
> > >  		ret = cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(&asym_op->ecpm, &meta_buf,
> > >  					 sess->cnxk_fpm_iova,
> > >  					 sess->ec_grp[sess->ec_ctx.curveid],
> > > -					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst);
> > > +					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst,
> > > +					 sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
> > >  		if (unlikely(ret))
> > >  			goto req_fail;
> > >  		break;
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
  2023-04-18 12:19     ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
@ 2023-04-18 12:38       ` Xueming(Steven) Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xueming(Steven) Li @ 2023-04-18 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan, stable; +Cc: Anoob Joseph

Ack, thanks for update.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> Sent: 4/18/2023 20:19
> To: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> 
> Hi,
> Please drop this patch as we would not need this fix for 22.11.2.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gowrishankar
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4:52 PM
> > To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>;
> > stable@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> > Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM
> > parameters
> >
> > External Email
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > There is a compilation error:
> >
> > In file included from
> > ../../../auto/mtbcswgwork/xuemingl/workspace/dpdk/drivers/crypto/cnxk/
> > cn9k
> > _cryptodev_ops.c:15:
> > ../../../auto/mtbcswgwork/xuemingl/workspace/dpdk/drivers/crypto/cnxk/
> > cnxk
> > _ae.h:958:13: error: no member named 'lf' in 'struct cnxk_ae_sess'
> >                                          sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
> >                                          ~~~~  ^
> >
> > Please provide a new version if we do need it for 22.11 LTS.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> > > Sent: 4/18/2023 14:23
> > > To: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>;
> > > stable@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: anoobj@marvell.com
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM
> > > parameters
> > >
> > > Thanks, patch applied.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > > > Sent: 4/11/2023 15:41
> > > > To: stable@dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: anoobj@marvell.com; Xueming(Steven) Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>;
> > > > Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters
> > > >
> > > > [ upstream commit 76618fc4bef616f16b6c92f15681ea080eabb486 ]
> > > >
> > > > Fix the order of ECFPM parameters according to target board.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 8e39b133235 ("crypto/cnxk: support fixed point
> > > > multiplication")
> > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
> > > > <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h | 48
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > > > b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h index adf719da73..f1183376d0
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/cnxk/cnxk_ae.h
> > > > @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static __rte_always_inline int
> > > > cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
> > > >  		   struct roc_ae_buf_ptr *meta_buf, uint64_t *fpm_iova,
> > > >  		   struct roc_ae_ec_group *ec_grp, uint8_t curveid,
> > > > -		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst)
> > > > +		   struct cpt_inst_s *inst, int cpt_ver)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	uint16_t scalar_align, p_align;
> > > >  	uint16_t dlen, prime_len;
> > > > @@ -697,26 +697,33 @@ cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(struct
> > > > rte_crypto_ecpm_op_param *ecpm,
> > > >  	scalar_align = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(ecpm->scalar.length, 8);
> > > >
> > > >  	/*
> > > > -	 * Set dlen = sum(ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates), prime,
> > > > -	 * scalar length),
> > > > +	 * Set dlen = sum(prime, scalar length, table address and
> > > > +	 * optionally ROUNDUP8(input point(x and y coordinates)).
> > > >  	 * Please note point length is equivalent to prime of the curve
> > > >  	 */
> > > > -	dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> > > > -
> > > > -	memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > > > -
> > > > -	*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > > > -	dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > > > -
> > > > -	/* Copy scalar, prime */
> > > > -	memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > > > -	dptr += scalar_align;
> > > > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > > > -	dptr += p_align;
> > > > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> > > > -	dptr += p_align;
> > > > -	memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> > > > -	dptr += p_align;
> > > > +	if (cpt_ver == ROC_CPT_REVISION_ID_96XX_C0) {
> > > > +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + 3 * p_align + scalar_align;
> > > > +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > > > +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > > > +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > > > +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > > > +		dptr += scalar_align;
> > > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->consta.data, ec_grp->consta.length);
> > > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->constb.data, ec_grp->constb.length);
> > > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > > +	} else {
> > > > +		dlen = sizeof(fpm_table_iova) + p_align + scalar_align;
> > > > +		memset(dptr, 0, dlen);
> > > > +		memcpy(dptr, ecpm->scalar.data, ecpm->scalar.length);
> > > > +		dptr += scalar_align;
> > > > +		memcpy(dptr, ec_grp->prime.data, ec_grp->prime.length);
> > > > +		dptr += p_align;
> > > > +		*(uint64_t *)dptr = fpm_table_iova;
> > > > +		dptr += sizeof(fpm_table_iova);
> > > > +	}
> > > >
> > > >  	/* Setup opcodes */
> > > >  	w4.s.opcode_major = ROC_AE_MAJOR_OP_ECC; @@ -947,7 +954,8
> > > @@
> > > > cnxk_ae_enqueue(struct cnxk_cpt_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op *op,
> > > >  		ret = cnxk_ae_ecfpm_prep(&asym_op->ecpm, &meta_buf,
> > > >  					 sess->cnxk_fpm_iova,
> > > >  					 sess->ec_grp[sess->ec_ctx.curveid],
> > > > -					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst);
> > > > +					 sess->ec_ctx.curveid, inst,
> > > > +					 sess->lf->roc_cpt->cpt_revision);
> > > >  		if (unlikely(ret))
> > > >  			goto req_fail;
> > > >  		break;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-18 12:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-11  7:40 [PATCH 22.11] crypto/cnxk: fix order of ECFPM parameters Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-04-18  6:23 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2023-04-18 11:22   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2023-04-18 12:19     ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-04-18 12:38       ` Xueming(Steven) Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).