DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] ethdev: fix DMA zone reserve not honoring size
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:36:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31ff511d-db25-7a64-63cb-97272f363dc1@solarflare.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190402073612.t1zTtIRA1w5OTKkLsbXZ8ItZq6dE-0ftlrdJB_aWhSQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <819b2c86516855fda65403a8e94be9d03c4d7eeb.camel@marvell.com>

On 4/2/19 3:47 AM, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 10:30 +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> External Email
>> On 3/31/19 7:25 PM, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote:
>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>>>
>>> The `rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve()` is generally used to create HW
>>> rings.
>>> In some scenarios when a driver needs to reconfigure the ring size
>>> since the named memzone already exists it returns the previous
>>> memzone
>>> without checking if a different sized ring is requested.
>>>
>>> Introduce a check to see if the ring size requested is different
>>> from the
>>> previously created memzone length.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 719dbebceb81 ("xen: allow determining DOM0 at runtime")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>>> ---
>>>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 5 ++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> index 12b66b68c..4ae12e43b 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -3604,9 +3604,12 @@ rte_eth_dma_zone_reserve(const struct
>>> rte_eth_dev *dev, const char *ring_name,
>>>   	}
>>>   
>>>   	mz = rte_memzone_lookup(z_name);
>>> -	if (mz)
>>> +	if (mz && (mz->len == size))
>>>   		return mz;
>>>   
>>> +	if (mz)
>>> +		rte_memzone_free(mz);
>>   
>> NACK
>> I really don't like that API which should reserve does free if
>> requested
>> size does not match previously allocated.
> Why? Is due to API name?

1. The problem really exists. The problem is bad and it very good that you
     caught it and came up with a patch. Many thanks.
2. Silently free and reallocate memory is bad. Memory could be 
used/mapped etc.
3. As an absolute minimum if we accept the behaviour it must be documented
     in the function description.

>   If so,
> Can we have rte_eth_dma_zone_reservere_with_resize() then ?
> or any another name, You would like to have?

4. I'd prefer an error if different size (or bigger) memzone is requested,
     but I understand that it can break existing drivers.

Thomas, Ferruh, what do you think?

>> I understand the motivation, but I don't think the solution is
>> correct.
> What you think it has correct solution then?

See above plus handling in drivers or dedicated function with
better name as you suggest above.

> Obviously, We can not allocate max ring size in init time.
> If the NIC has support for 64K HW ring, We will be wasting too much as
> it is per queue.

Yes, I agree that it is an overkill.

net/sfc tries to carefully free/reserve on NIC/queues reconfigure.

Many thanks,
Andrew.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-31 16:25 [dpdk-dev] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-03-31 16:25 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-01  7:30 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-01  7:30   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-01  9:28   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-01  9:28     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-01  9:40     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-01  9:40       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-01 12:12       ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-01 12:12         ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-02  0:47   ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02  0:47     ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02  7:36     ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2019-04-02  7:36       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02  8:25       ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02  8:25         ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-02  8:44         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-02  8:44           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-04 22:23           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 22:23             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-05  8:03             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-05  8:03               ` Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31ff511d-db25-7a64-63cb-97272f363dc1@solarflare.com \
    --to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).