DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: Remove	PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM offload flags
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 15:18:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801616357C3@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1558006933-32247-2-git-send-email-skori@marvell.com>


Hi,
 
> Currently PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM is being set into mbuf->ol_flags
> during fragmentation and reassemble operation implicitly.
> Because of this, application is forced to use checksum offload
> whether it is supported by platform or not.
> 
> Also documentation does not provide any expected value of ol_flags
> in returned mbuf (reassembled or fragmented) so application will never
> come to know that which offloads are enabled. So transmission may be failed
> for the platforms which does not support checksum offload.
> 
> Also, IPv6 does not contain any checksum field in header so setting
> mbuf->ol_flags with PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM is itself invalid.
> 
> So removing mentioned flag from the library.

As there is a change in public API behavior, I think it deserves update in release notes.
Apart from that:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>


> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c | 1 -
>  lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c    | 3 ---
>  lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c    | 3 ---
>  3 files changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> index a96fb03..13e60fb 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ static inline void __free_fragments(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num)
>  		fragment_offset = (uint16_t)(fragment_offset +
>  		    out_pkt->pkt_len - sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr));
> 
> -		out_pkt->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
>  		out_pkt->l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
> 
>  		/* Write the fragment to the output list */
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
> index 1029b7a..4e20431 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_reassembly.c
> @@ -66,9 +66,6 @@ struct rte_mbuf *
>  	m = fp->frags[IP_FIRST_FRAG_IDX].mb;
>  	fp->frags[IP_FIRST_FRAG_IDX].mb = NULL;
> 
> -	/* update mbuf fields for reassembled packet. */
> -	m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
> -
>  	/* update ipv4 header for the reassembled packet */
>  	ip_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, struct ipv4_hdr *, m->l2_len);
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> index 855e3f7..eb8b849 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_reassembly.c
> @@ -89,9 +89,6 @@ struct rte_mbuf *
>  	m = fp->frags[IP_FIRST_FRAG_IDX].mb;
>  	fp->frags[IP_FIRST_FRAG_IDX].mb = NULL;
> 
> -	/* update mbuf fields for reassembled packet. */
> -	m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM;
> -
>  	/* update ipv6 header for the reassembled datagram */
>  	ip_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, struct ipv6_hdr *, m->l2_len);
> 
> --
> 1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-18 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16 11:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Removing PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM from fragmentation/reassembly lib Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: Remove PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM offload flags Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/ip_reassembly: " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Removing PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM from fragmentation/reassembly lib Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: Remove PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM offload flags Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-18 15:18     ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2019-06-26 21:10       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-04 16:52         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-05  8:31           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-16 11:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-18 15:21     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20  8:09       ` Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-20  8:15         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20 10:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-20 10:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/ip_reassembly: " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-20 11:29         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20 11:28       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/ip_fragmentation: " Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-07-08  4:32       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: remove IP checkum offload flag jerinj
2019-07-08  4:32         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: enable IP checksum offload jerinj
2019-07-08  4:33         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ip_reassembly: " jerinj
2019-07-08  9:07         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: remove IP checkum offload flag Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-16 11:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/ip_reassembly: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf Sunil Kumar Kori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801616357C3@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).