DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Santana <msantana@redhat.com>,
	ci@dpdk.org,  Juraj Linkes <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [RFC pw-ci] pw_mon: check for recheck requested comments
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:38:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zFAK+wkuBVvXY3wA2C_jxBLh9f6uQbf+copAT5Uovd+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tmtsqdcz2.fsf@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:18 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ENOTREADY: Missing the actual recheck logic... needs some input /
>            design before committing to anything.
>
> When a developer wants to ask for a test case recheck (for example,
> maybe to rerun the github-actions test suite), we scan for the specific
> line:
>
> ^Recheck-request: .*$
>
> The line would break up as:
>
>    Recheck-request: [context]
>
> where '[context]' is the name of the check (as it appears in the UI).
> For example, if we look at a patch that has 'github-robot', we can
> request a recheck of the series by sending an email reply with the line:

It could happen that the tree was broken and we want to rerun all or a
list of tests.
Coud we accept multiple ^Recheck-request lines?
Or maybe have a magic "all" context?


>
> Recheck-request: github-robot
>
> It is important to use the 'msgid' field to distinguish recheck
> requests.  Otherwise, we will continuously reparse the same
> recheck request and loop forever.  Additionally, we've discussed using a
> counter to limit the recheck requests to a single 'recheck' per test
> name.
>
> As an additional change, we run after the 'superseded' and 'completed'
> checks, to ensure that we don't bother parsing comments from older
> series that aren't relevant any longer.

There was also an ask on filtering requesters (only maintainers and
patch authors can ask for a recheck).


-- 
David Marchand


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 14:17 Aaron Conole
2021-05-20  9:37 ` Juraj Linkeš
2021-05-20 19:16   ` Aaron Conole
2021-05-20 13:38 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-05-20 21:05   ` Aaron Conole
2021-05-21  9:38     ` David Marchand
2021-06-17 14:38       ` Lincoln Lavoie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8zFAK+wkuBVvXY3wA2C_jxBLh9f6uQbf+copAT5Uovd+w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=msantana@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).