DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_clear that clears all keys
@ 2015-03-06 11:10 Bruce Richardson
  2015-03-06 12:02 ` Tomas Vestelind
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-06 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomas Vestelind; +Cc: dev

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:47:57PM +0200, Tomas Vestelind wrote:
> I added rte_hash_clear which clear the map from all previously added
> keys.
> 
This patch is now quite old and needs an update to add the new API to the
rte_hash_version.map. A unit test for the new function would also be good to
have. Otherwise patch content looks ok. Is an updated V2 planned?

Regards,
/Bruce

> Signed-off-by: Tomas Vestelind <tomas.vestelind at gmail.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h |   10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
> index 2108c4f..917a6c1 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
> @@ -507,3 +507,17 @@ rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys)
>  
>      return found_keys;
>  }
> +
> +void
> +rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h)
> +{
> +    unsigned int bucket, entry;
> +
> +    /* Clear all entries by invalidating each signature */
> +    for (bucket = 0; bucket < h->num_buckets; bucket++) {
> +        hash_sig_t *sig = get_sig_tbl_bucket(h, bucket);
> +        for (entry = 0; entry < h->bucket_entries; entry++) {
> +            sig[entry] = NULL_SIGNATURE;
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
> index e0fb28f..b84137e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
> @@ -318,6 +318,16 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
>   */
>  unsigned int
>  rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys);
> +
> +/**
> + * Clear all keys. This operation is not multi-thread safe and should only be
> + * called from one thread.
> + *
> + * @param h
> + *   Hash table to clear.
> + */
> +void
> +rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h);
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
>  }
>  #endif
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_clear that clears all keys
  2015-03-06 11:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_clear that clears all keys Bruce Richardson
@ 2015-03-06 12:02 ` Tomas Vestelind
  2015-03-06 12:53   ` Bruce Richardson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Vestelind @ 2015-03-06 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Richardson; +Cc: dev

Hi Bruce!

Oh yea, this patch is quite old :)

I'm currently not working actively with DPDK. If no one else wants to do 
it, I could do the update and add a unit test

/Tomas

On 2015-03-06 12:10, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:47:57PM +0200, Tomas Vestelind wrote:
>> I added rte_hash_clear which clear the map from all previously added
>> keys.
>>
> This patch is now quite old and needs an update to add the new API to the
> rte_hash_version.map. A unit test for the new function would also be good to
> have. Otherwise patch content looks ok. Is an updated V2 planned?
>
> Regards,
> /Bruce
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Vestelind <tomas.vestelind at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
>>   lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h |   10 ++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
>> index 2108c4f..917a6c1 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
>> @@ -507,3 +507,17 @@ rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys)
>>   
>>       return found_keys;
>>   }
>> +
>> +void
>> +rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int bucket, entry;
>> +
>> +    /* Clear all entries by invalidating each signature */
>> +    for (bucket = 0; bucket < h->num_buckets; bucket++) {
>> +        hash_sig_t *sig = get_sig_tbl_bucket(h, bucket);
>> +        for (entry = 0; entry < h->bucket_entries; entry++) {
>> +            sig[entry] = NULL_SIGNATURE;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
>> index e0fb28f..b84137e 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
>> @@ -318,6 +318,16 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
>>    */
>>   unsigned int
>>   rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Clear all keys. This operation is not multi-thread safe and should only be
>> + * called from one thread.
>> + *
>> + * @param h
>> + *   Hash table to clear.
>> + */
>> +void
>> +rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h);
>>   #ifdef __cplusplus
>>   }
>>   #endif
>> -- 
>> 1.7.10.4
>>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_clear that clears all keys
  2015-03-06 12:02 ` Tomas Vestelind
@ 2015-03-06 12:53   ` Bruce Richardson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Richardson @ 2015-03-06 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomas Vestelind; +Cc: dev

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:02:56PM +0100, Tomas Vestelind wrote:
> Hi Bruce!
> 
> Oh yea, this patch is quite old :)
> 
> I'm currently not working actively with DPDK. If no one else wants to do it,
> I could do the update and add a unit test
> 
> /Tomas

Hi Tomas,

no pressure, since there doesn't appear to be pressing interest in this enhancement
and since we are now passed feature freeze for 2.0.
However, contributions for our next release are always welcome!

Regards,
/Bruce

> 
> On 2015-03-06 12:10, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:47:57PM +0200, Tomas Vestelind wrote:
> >>I added rte_hash_clear which clear the map from all previously added
> >>keys.
> >>
> >This patch is now quite old and needs an update to add the new API to the
> >rte_hash_version.map. A unit test for the new function would also be good to
> >have. Otherwise patch content looks ok. Is an updated V2 planned?
> >
> >Regards,
> >/Bruce
> >
> >>Signed-off-by: Tomas Vestelind <tomas.vestelind at gmail.com>
> >>---
> >>  lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
> >>  lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h |   10 ++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
> >>index 2108c4f..917a6c1 100644
> >>--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
> >>+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
> >>@@ -507,3 +507,17 @@ rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys)
> >>      return found_keys;
> >>  }
> >>+
> >>+void
> >>+rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h)
> >>+{
> >>+    unsigned int bucket, entry;
> >>+
> >>+    /* Clear all entries by invalidating each signature */
> >>+    for (bucket = 0; bucket < h->num_buckets; bucket++) {
> >>+        hash_sig_t *sig = get_sig_tbl_bucket(h, bucket);
> >>+        for (entry = 0; entry < h->bucket_entries; entry++) {
> >>+            sig[entry] = NULL_SIGNATURE;
> >>+        }
> >>+    }
> >>+}
> >>diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
> >>index e0fb28f..b84137e 100644
> >>--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
> >>+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
> >>@@ -318,6 +318,16 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
> >>   */
> >>  unsigned int
> >>  rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys);
> >>+
> >>+/**
> >>+ * Clear all keys. This operation is not multi-thread safe and should only be
> >>+ * called from one thread.
> >>+ *
> >>+ * @param h
> >>+ *   Hash table to clear.
> >>+ */
> >>+void
> >>+rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h);
> >>  #ifdef __cplusplus
> >>  }
> >>  #endif
> >>-- 
> >>1.7.10.4
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_clear that clears all keys
@ 2014-08-12 21:47 Tomas Vestelind
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Vestelind @ 2014-08-12 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

I added rte_hash_clear which clear the map from all previously added
keys.

Signed-off-by: Tomas Vestelind <tomas.vestelind@gmail.com>
---
 lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h |   10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
index 2108c4f..917a6c1 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.c
@@ -507,3 +507,17 @@ rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys)
 
     return found_keys;
 }
+
+void
+rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h)
+{
+    unsigned int bucket, entry;
+
+    /* Clear all entries by invalidating each signature */
+    for (bucket = 0; bucket < h->num_buckets; bucket++) {
+        hash_sig_t *sig = get_sig_tbl_bucket(h, bucket);
+        for (entry = 0; entry < h->bucket_entries; entry++) {
+            sig[entry] = NULL_SIGNATURE;
+        }
+    }
+}
diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
index e0fb28f..b84137e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h
@@ -318,6 +318,16 @@ rte_hash_lookup_bulk(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys,
  */
 unsigned int
 rte_hash_keys(const struct rte_hash *h, void *keys);
+
+/**
+ * Clear all keys. This operation is not multi-thread safe and should only be
+ * called from one thread.
+ *
+ * @param h
+ *   Hash table to clear.
+ */
+void
+rte_hash_clear(const struct rte_hash *h);
 #ifdef __cplusplus
 }
 #endif
-- 
1.7.10.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-06 12:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-06 11:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: added rte_hash_clear that clears all keys Bruce Richardson
2015-03-06 12:02 ` Tomas Vestelind
2015-03-06 12:53   ` Bruce Richardson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-12 21:47 Tomas Vestelind

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).