Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] test/event_crypto_adapter: return error with unsupported mode

["Gujjar, Abhinandan S" <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>]

Hi Ankur,

Please see comments inline.

Regards
Abhinandan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 8:05 PM
> To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> <anoobj@marvell.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] test/event_crypto_adapter: return error with
> unsupported mode
> 
> Hi Abhinandan,
> 
> Please see my comments inline.
> 
> Thanks
> Ankur
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> >Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 12:41 PM
> >To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> ><anoobj@marvell.com>
> >Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH 1/3] test/event_crypto_adapter: return error
> >with unsupported mode
> >
> >External Email
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Hi Ankur,
> >
> >This patch requires minor change. Please find the comment inline.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gujjar, Abhinandan S
> >> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 1:07 PM
> >> To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: jerinj@marvell.com; anoobj@marvell.com
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] test/event_crypto_adapter: return error with
> >> unsupported mode
> >>
> >> Acked-by: abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com (For series)
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 2:46 PM
> >> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> > Cc: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>;
> >> > jerinj@marvell.com; anoobj@marvell.com; Ankur Dwivedi
> >> > <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >> > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] test/event_crypto_adapter: return error with
> >> > unsupported mode
> >> >
> >> > The capability of a event device should be checked before creating
> >> > a event crypto adapter in a particular mode. The test case returns
> >> > error if the mode is not supported.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 30
> >> > ++++++++++++++++++----------
> >> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> > b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> > index 8d42462d8..930c2a9bc 100644
> >> > --- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> > +++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> >> > @@ -750,15 +750,23 @@ configure_event_crypto_adapter(enum
> >> > rte_event_crypto_adapter_mode mode)
> >> >  	uint32_t cap;
> >> >  	int ret;
> >> >
> >> > +	ret = rte_event_crypto_adapter_caps_get(evdev, TEST_CDEV_ID,
> >> > &cap);
> >> > +	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to get adapter capabilities\n");
> >> > +
> >> > +	if ((mode == RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_OP_FORWARD) &&
> >> > +	    !(cap &
> >> > RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT_OP_FWD))
> >> > +		return -ENOTSUP;
> >> > +
> >> > +	if ((mode == RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_OP_NEW) &&
> >> > +	    !(cap &
> >> > RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT_OP_NEW))
> >> > +		return -ENOTSUP;
> >> > +
> >SW adapter does not have *_INTERNAL_PORT_* caps. Just noticed test was
> >failing here.
> >Could you please bypass this check for "event_sw" and repost the patch?
> [Ankur] I was thinking of handling this by reading
> rte_eventdevs[evdev].data->name.
> If the name matches event_sw0(which is the default device name), I will
> bypass if checks.
> Can the event_sw device name be anything else?
> Or, if there is a better way of handling this please let me know.
Yes. You can also use rte_event_dev_info_get(evdev, &info) and check info.driver_name for "event_sw".

> >
> >> >  	/* Create adapter with default port creation callback */
> >> >  	ret = rte_event_crypto_adapter_create(TEST_ADAPTER_ID,
> >> > -					      TEST_CDEV_ID,
> >> > +					      evdev,
> >> >  					      &conf, mode);
> >> >  	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to create event crypto
> >> adapter\n");
> >> >
> >> > -	ret = rte_event_crypto_adapter_caps_get(TEST_ADAPTER_ID,
> >> > evdev, &cap);
> >> > -	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to get adapter capabilities\n");
> >> > -
> >> >  	if (cap &
> >> > RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_CAP_INTERNAL_PORT_QP_EV_BIND) {
> >> >  		ret =
> >> > rte_event_crypto_adapter_queue_pair_add(TEST_ADAPTER_ID,
> >> >  				TEST_CDEV_ID, TEST_CDEV_QP_ID,
> &response_info); @@ -813,6
> >> > +821,8 @@ test_crypto_adapter_conf(enum
> >> > rte_event_crypto_adapter_mode mode)
> >> >  			TEST_ASSERT(ret >= 0, "Failed to link queue %d "
> >> >  					"port=%u\n", qid,
> >> >  					params.crypto_event_port_id);
> >> > +		} else {
> >> > +			return ret;
> >> >  		}
> >> >  		crypto_adapter_setup_done = 1;
> >> >  	}
> >> > @@ -845,24 +855,24 @@ static int
> >> >  test_crypto_adapter_conf_op_forward_mode(void)
> >> >  {
> >> >  	enum rte_event_crypto_adapter_mode mode;
> >> > +	int ret;
> >> >
> >> >  	mode = RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_OP_FORWARD;
> >> > -	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_crypto_adapter_conf(mode),
> >> > -				"Failed to config crypto adapter");
> >> > +	ret = test_crypto_adapter_conf(mode);
> >> >
> >> > -	return TEST_SUCCESS;
> >> > +	return ret;
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> >  static int
> >> >  test_crypto_adapter_conf_op_new_mode(void)
> >> >  {
> >> >  	enum rte_event_crypto_adapter_mode mode;
> >> > +	int ret;
> >> >
> >> >  	mode = RTE_EVENT_CRYPTO_ADAPTER_OP_NEW;
> >> > -	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(test_crypto_adapter_conf(mode),
> >> > -				"Failed to config crypto adapter");
> >> > +	ret = test_crypto_adapter_conf(mode);
> >> >
> >> > -	return TEST_SUCCESS;
> >> > +	return ret;
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > 2.28.0