DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>,
	Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 03:26:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR08MB7718610E27B4E86BA3118C04C8FCA@AS8PR08MB7718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS8PR08MB7718602AA2ABB7141CA3FC8DC8FEA@AS8PR08MB7718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

For Konstantin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feifei Wang
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2023 1:52 PM
> To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>; Konstantin
> Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei
> Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>;
> nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2023 12:41 AM
> > To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; Konstantin Ananyev
> > <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei Xing
> > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> > <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> <nd@arm.com>; nd
> > <nd@arm.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle mode
> >
> >
> > Hi Feifei,
> >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Feifei Wang
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 11:11 AM
> > > > > To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>;
> > > > > Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > > > > Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei Xing
> > > > > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> > > > > <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle
> > > > > mode
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 4, 2023 6:22 PM
> > > > > > To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>; Konstantin Ananyev
> > > > > > <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
> > > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> > > > > <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > > > > > Yuying Zhang <Yuying.Zhang@intel.com>; Beilei Xing
> > > > > > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>; nd
> > > > > > <nd@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement mbufs recycle
> > > > > > mode
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Define specific function implementation for i40e driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, mbufs recycle mode can support
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 128bit vector path and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > avx2
> > > > > > > > > > > > path.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > And can be enabled both in fast free and no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > fast free
> > mode.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > > > <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c                |   1 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h                |   2 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  .../net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 147
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c                  |  32 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h                  |   4 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  drivers/net/i40e/meson.build                  |   1 +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  6 files changed, 187 insertions(+)  create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mode
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > .c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8271bbb394..50ba9aac94
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ static const struct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > eth_dev_ops i40e_eth_dev_ops
> > > > > > > > > > > > = {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	.flow_ops_get                 =
> i40e_dev_flow_ops_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	.rxq_info_get                 = i40e_rxq_info_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	.txq_info_get                 = i40e_txq_info_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	.recycle_rxq_info_get         =
> > > > > i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	.rx_burst_mode_get            =
> > > > > i40e_rx_burst_mode_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	.tx_burst_mode_get            =
> > > > > i40e_tx_burst_mode_get,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	.timesync_enable              =
> i40e_timesync_enable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6f65d5e0ac..af758798e1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1355,6 +1355,8 @@ void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t
> > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	struct rte_eth_rxq_info *qinfo);  void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_txq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t
> > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	struct rte_eth_txq_info *qinfo);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +void i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get(struct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +*recycle_rxq_info);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  int i40e_rx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *dev, uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			   struct rte_eth_burst_mode
> *mode);
> > > > > int
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_tx_burst_mode_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *dev, uint16_t queue_id, diff -- git
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_comm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > .c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_comm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on .c new file mode 100644 index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000..5663ecccde
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ co
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ mmon
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ .c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2023 Arm Limited.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#include <stdint.h> #include
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +<ethdev_driver.h>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "base/i40e_prototype.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "base/i40e_type.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "i40e_ethdev.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#include "i40e_rxtx.h"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wcast-qual"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec(void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +*rx_queue, uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +nb_mbufs) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct i40e_rx_entry *rxep;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t rx_id;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint64_t paddr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint64_t dma_addr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t i;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxdp = rxq->rx_ring + rxq->rxrearm_start;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rxrearm_start];
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	for (i = 0; i < nb_mbufs; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		/* Initialize rxdp descs. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		paddr = (rxep[i].mbuf)->buf_iova +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		dma_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(paddr);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		/* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = dma_addr;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* Update the descriptor initializer index */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxq->rxrearm_start += nb_mbufs;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rx_id = rxq->rxrearm_start - 1;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if (unlikely(rxq->rxrearm_start >= rxq-
> >nb_rx_desc)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		rxq->rxrearm_start = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		rx_id = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxq->rxrearm_nb -= nb_mbufs;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rte_io_wmb();
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +rx_id); }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec(void *tx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info
> *recycle_rxq_info) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct i40e_tx_queue *txq = tx_queue;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct rte_mbuf **rxep;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	int i, n;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t nb_recycle_mbufs;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t avail = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t mbuf_ring_size = recycle_rxq_info-
> > > > > >mbuf_ring_size;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t mask = recycle_rxq_info-
> >mbuf_ring_size - 1;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t refill_requirement =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +recycle_rxq_info-
> > > > > > > > > > >refill_requirement;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t refill_head = *recycle_rxq_info-
> >refill_head;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	uint16_t receive_tail =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +*recycle_rxq_info->receive_tail;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* Get available recycling Rx buffers. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	avail = (mbuf_ring_size - (refill_head -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +receive_tail)) & mask;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* Check Tx free thresh and Rx available
> space. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if (txq->nb_tx_free > txq->tx_free_thresh ||
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +avail <=
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +txq-
> > > > > > > > > > >tx_rs_thresh)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* check DD bits on threshold descriptor */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +et
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +_bsz
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +&
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > )
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	n = txq->tx_rs_thresh;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	nb_recycle_mbufs = n;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* Mbufs recycle mode can only support no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +ring buffer
> > > > > > > > > > wrapping
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > around.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * Two case for this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * case 1: The refill head of Rx buffer ring
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +needs to be aligned
> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * mbuf ring size. In this case, the number
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +of Tx
> > > > > freeing buffers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * should be equal to refill_requirement.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * case 2: The refill head of Rx ring buffer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +does not need to be
> > > > > > > > > > aligned
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * with mbuf ring size. In this case, the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +update of refill head
> > > > > > > > > > can not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * exceed the Rx mbuf ring size.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if (refill_requirement != n ||
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		(!refill_requirement && (refill_head +
> n >
> > > > > > > > > > mbuf_ring_size)))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* First buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n -
> 1)];
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxep = recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxep += refill_head;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if (txq->offloads &
> > > > > RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		/* Avoid txq contains buffers from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +unexpected
> > > > > > > > > > mempool. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		if (unlikely(recycle_rxq_info->mp
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +					!=
> txep[0].mbuf-
> > > > > >pool))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		/* Directly put mbufs from Tx to Rx. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			rxep[i] = txep[i].mbuf;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	} else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			rxep[i] =
> > > > > > > > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			/* If Tx buffers are not the last
> > > > > reference or
> > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			 * unexpected mempool,
> previous
> > > > > copied
> > > > > > > > > > buffers are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			 * considered as invalid.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			if (unlikely((rxep[i] == NULL
> &&
> > > > > > > > > > refill_requirement) ||
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Konstantin]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you pls remind me why it is ok to have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rxep[i]==NULL when refill_requirement is not set?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If reill_requirement is not zero, it means each
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tx freed buffer must be valid and can be put into Rx
> sw_ring.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Then the refill head of Rx buffer ring can be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > aligned with mbuf ring size. Briefly speaking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the number
> > > > > > > > > > > > of Tx valid freed buffer must be equal to Rx
> > refill_requirement.
> > > > > > > > > > > > For example, i40e driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If reill_requirement is zero, it means that the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > refill head of Rx buffer ring does not need to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be aligned with mbuf ring size, thus if Tx have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > n valid freed buffers, we just need to put these
> > > > > > > > > > > > > n buffers into Rx
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sw-
> > > > > > > > > > > > ring, and not to be equal to the Rx setting rearm number.
> > > > > > > > > > > > For example, mlx5 driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In conclusion, above difference is due to pmd
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers have different
> > > > > > > > > > > > strategies to update their Rx rearm(refill) head.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For i40e driver, if rearm_head exceed 1024, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > will be set as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 0 due to  the
> > > > > > > > > > > > number of each rearm is a fixed value by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For mlx5 driver. Its rearm_head can exceed 1024,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and use mask to achieve
> > > > > > > > > > > > real index. Thus its rearm number can be a different value.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, but if rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf),
> > > > > > > > > > > > it means that this mbuf is not free yet and can't be
> reused.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't we then set nb_recycle_mbufs = 0 in that
> > > > > > > > > > > > case
> > too?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Or probably would be enough to skip that mbuf?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Might be something like that:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > for (i = 0, j = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 	rxep[j] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > > > > > > > > > > 	if (rxep[j] == NULL || recycle_rxq_info->mp !=
> > > > > > > > > > > > rxep[j].mbuf-
> > > > > > >pool))  {
> > > > > > > > > > > > 		if (refill_requirement) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > 			nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > 			break;
> > > > > > > > > > > > 		}
> > > > > > > > > > > > 	} else
> > > > > > > > > > > > 		j++;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* now j contains actual number of recycled mbufs
> > > > > > > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> 	recycle_rxq_info-
> > > > > >mp !=
> > > > > > > > > > txep[i].mbuf-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >pool))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +				nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		/* If Tx buffers are not the last
> reference or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		 * from unexpected mempool, all
> recycled
> > > > > buffers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		 * are put into mempool.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		if (nb_recycle_mbufs == 0)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +				if (rxep[i] != NULL)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > 	rte_mempool_put(rxep[i]-
> > > > > > > > > > >pool,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rxep[i]);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > [Konstantin] After another thought, it might be
> > > > > > > > > > > easier and cleaner
> > > > > > just to:
> > > > > > > > > > > if (rxep[j] == NULL || recycle_rxq_info->mp !=
> > > > > > > > > > > rxep[j].mbuf-
> > >pool)
> > > > > > > > > > > 	nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, from my understanding - if
> > > > > > > > > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) returns NULL, then we
> > > > > > > > > > > can't recycle
> > > > > > that mbuf.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [Feifei] Agree with that
> > > > > > > > > > > 'rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(mbuf) returns NULL, then
> > > > > > > > > > we can't recycle that mbuf'.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Firstly, we should know for i40e driver,  the number
> > > > > > > > > > > of free mbufs is fixed, it
> > > > > > > > > > must equal to 'tx_rs_thresh'
> > > > > > > > > > > This means if we start to free Tx mbufs, it cannot
> > > > > > > > > > > be interrupted until the
> > > > > > > > > > given amount of mbufs are freed.
> > > > > > > > > > > In the meanwhile, doing prefree operation for a Tx
> > > > > > > > > > > mbuf can be looked at this mbuf is freed from this
> > > > > > > > > > > TX sw-ring if the API returns NULL. This is due
> > > > > > > > > > to that call 'prefree_seg' function means update the
> > > > > > > > > > mbuf
> > refcnt.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So let's come back our recycle mbuf case.
> > > > > > > > > > > Here we consider that the case if we have 32 mbufs
> > > > > > > > > > > need to be freed, and
> > > > > > > > > > we firstly do the pre-free.
> > > > > > > > > > > And then first 8 mbufs is good and return value is not none.
> > > > > > > > > > > But the 9th
> > > > > > > > > > mbuf is bad, its refcnt is more than 1.
> > > > > > > > > > > So we just update its refcnt and cannot put it into Rx sw-
> ring.
> > > > > > > > > > > For Tx sw-ring,
> > > > > > > > > > this mbuf has been freed.
> > > > > > > > > > > Then we should continue to do pre-free operation for
> > > > > > > > > > > the next Tx mbufs to ensure the given amount of
> > > > > > > > > > > mbufs are
> > freed.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Do a conclusion for this, this is because if we
> > > > > > > > > > > start to do pre-free operation,  the Tx mbuf refcnt
> > > > > > > > > > > value maybe changed, so we cannot stop or
> > > > > > > > > > break until finish all the pre-free operation.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Finally, in the case that Rx refill_request is not
> > > > > > > > > > > zero, but the valid mbuf amount is less than this
> > > > > > > > > > > value, we must put back this Tx mbufs into
> > > > > > > > > > mempool.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Above is the reason why I do not directly jump out
> > > > > > > > > > > of the loop if some mbuf
> > > > > > > > > > return value is NULL.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yep, I already realized that it is a bit more
> > > > > > > > > > complicated and we need to continue with prefree() for
> > > > > > > > > > all packets even when we get NULL in
> > > > > > > > the middle.
> > > > > > > > > > Anyway the code has to be changed, right?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sorry, I think for the code, it is unnecessary to be changed.
> > > > > > > > > For no fast free path, currently:
> > > > > > > > > 1.   We check whether each mbuf is Ok and call pre_free
> function
> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > 2.1 For the mbuf return value is not NULL, it is put
> > > > > > > > > into Rx sw-
> > ring.
> > > > > > > > > 2.2 For the mbuf return value is zero and
> > > > > > > > > refill-request, it will also firstly put into Rx
> > > > > > > > > sw-ring, and we set nb_recycle =
> > > > > > > > > 0
> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > 3.1 We check nb_recycle, if it is not 0, we will
> > > > > > > > > continue to rearm Rx descs
> > > > > > > > and update its index by call descs_refill function.
> > > > > > > > > 3.2 if nb_recycle is 0, we will put valid recycle mbufs
> > > > > > > > > back into mempool as general path. This is necessary,
> > > > > > > > > because we need to ensure the freed Tx number is
> > > > > > > > > fixed.(Some buffers return is null can be seen as freed,
> > > > > > > > > others need to be put into mempool)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Or maybe I ignore something?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am talking about the case when both refill_requirement
> > > > > > > > and mbuf return values iare zero:
> > > > > > > > if (unlikely((rxep[i] == NULL && refill_requirement) ||         // ???
> > > > rxep[i]
> > > > > ==
> > > > > > 0
> > > > > > > > AND refill_requirement == 0 ???
> > > > > > > >  		recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> > > > > > > > 	nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As I can read the code you treat such situation as valid,
> > > > > > > > while I think we should reset nb_recycle_mbufs to zero
> > > > > > > > when rxep[i] == NULL, no matter what value refill_requirement is.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So this means for maybe MLX5 driver, its refill_request = 0.
> > > > > > > And if some mbufs return value is zero, the other mbufs can
> > > > > > > not be recycled into Rx sw-ring? Because nb_recycle=0, and
> > > > > > > they need to be put into
> > > > > > mempool.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think for such as MLX5 driver, we can allow recycle some
> > > > > > > valid mbufs into
> > > > > > Rx ring.
> > > > > > > Because no constraint for its refill number. Is my
> > > > > > > suggestion
> > reasonable?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suppose yes: if refill_request is zero we potentially can skip 'bad'
> > > > > > mbufs and continue with recycling for remaining ones.
> > > > > > It would probably require more changes in current code, but
> > > > > > sounds ok to me in general.
> > > > > That's Ok. Thanks for your careful reviewing.
> > > >
> > > > I'm very sorry not to receive your e-mail and until now I realize
> > > > we need to do some code change for i40e driver. Also thanks ferruh
> > > > to kindly
> > remind this.
> >
> > No worries at all and thanks for you and Ferruh fro fast reaction.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Agree with you we need some operation for the case that
> > > > (refill_requirement == 0 &&  rxep[i] == 0).
> > > > Thus maybe we can do a change as follows:
> > > >
> > > > for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > > > 	rxep[0] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > > 	if (unlikely((rxep[0] == NULL && refill_requirement) ||
> > > > 			recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> > > > 		nb_recycle_mbufs = 0;
> > > > 	if (likely(rxep[0]))
> > > > 		rxep++;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Is above change is Ok?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Just do a change for the above code:
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > -------------------------------
> > > int j = 0;
> > > ......
> > >
> > >  for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > >  	rxep[j] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> > > 	if (unlikely(rxep[j] == NULL  && !refill_requirement))
> > >  		continue;
> > > 	if (unlikely((rxep[j] == NULL && refill_requirement) ||
> > >  			recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> > >  		nb_recycle_mbufs  = 0;
> > > 	j++;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > if (nb_recycle_mbufs  == 0)
> > > 	for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
> > > 		if (rxep[i] != NULL)
> > > 			rte_mempool_put(rxep[i]->pool, rxep[i]);
> > > 	}
> >
> > I think it should work...
> > One more thing, shouldn't we reset
> > nb_recycle_mbufs  = j;
> >
> > Something like:
> >  if (nb_recycle_mbufs  == 0) {
> >  	for (i = 0; i < j; i++) {
> >  		if (rxep[i] != NULL)
> >  			rte_mempool_put(rxep[i]->pool, rxep[i]);
> >  	}
> > } else
> >   nb_recycle_mbufs  = j;
> >
> > ?
> >
> >
> Yes, we should reset it.
> 
> I just do a performance test with the new code and find the performance
> decrease with  8%, comparing with the old version.
> 
> Thus I think we should come back your previous idea:
> "we should reset nb_recycle_mbufs to zero when rxep[i] == NULL, no matter
> what value refill_requirement is":
> 
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> 	rxep[i] = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
> 	if (unlikely((rxep[i] == NULL) ||
> 			recycle_rxq_info->mp != txep[i].mbuf->pool))
> 		nb_recycle_mbufs  = 0;
> }
> 
> Thus we drop the case that putting the remaining valid mbuf into Rx sw-ring
> when no refill_request, but maintain good performance.

[Konstantin] I am ok with that way too.
Again that way, it looks simpler and probaly less error-prone.

Thanks
Konstantin
[Feifei] Agree with this, I will update a new version to the community.
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------
> 
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	/* Update counters for Tx. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	txq->nb_tx_free = (uint16_t)(txq->nb_tx_free
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +txq-
> > > > > > > > > > >tx_rs_thresh);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_dd
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +txq-
> > > > > > > > > > >tx_rs_thresh);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if (txq->tx_next_dd >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq-
> > > > > >tx_rs_thresh -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	return nb_recycle_mbufs; }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b4f65b58fa..a9c9eb331c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -3199,6 +3199,30 @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_txq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t
> queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	qinfo->conf.offloads = txq->offloads;  }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rxq_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +*dev, uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > queue_id,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info
> *recycle_rxq_info) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	struct i40e_adapter *ad =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev-
> >data-
> > > > > > > > > > >dev_private);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[queue_id];
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring = (void *)rxq-
> >sw_ring;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	recycle_rxq_info->mp = rxq->mp;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	recycle_rxq_info->mbuf_ring_size = rxq-
> >nb_rx_desc;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	recycle_rxq_info->receive_tail =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +&rxq->rx_tail;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	if (ad->rx_vec_allowed) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		recycle_rxq_info->refill_requirement =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		recycle_rxq_info->refill_head = &rxq-
> > > > > >rxrearm_start;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	} else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		recycle_rxq_info->refill_requirement =
> rxq-
> > > > > > > > > > >rx_free_thresh;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		recycle_rxq_info->refill_head = &rxq-
> > > > > >rx_free_trigger;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  #ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86  static inline bool
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > get_avx_supported(bool request_avx512) @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -3293,6
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +3317,8
> > > > > > > > @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  				dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> ad-
> > > > > > > > >rx_use_avx2 ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 	i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec_avx2 :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > 	i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +				dev-
> > > > > >recycle_rx_descriptors_refill =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > 	i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  		} else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			if (ad->rx_use_avx512) { @@ -
> 3311,9
> > > > > +3337,12
> > > > > > @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > > > *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  				dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> ad-
> > > > > > > > >rx_use_avx2 ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > 	i40e_recv_pkts_vec_avx2 :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> 	i40e_recv_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +				dev-
> > > > > >recycle_rx_descriptors_refill =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > 	i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  		}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  #else /* RTE_ARCH_X86 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		dev->recycle_rx_descriptors_refill =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  		if (dev->data->scattered_rx) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  				     "Using Vector
> Scattered Rx
> > > > > > > > (port %d).", @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -3481,15 +3510,18 @@
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_set_tx_function(struct rte_eth_dev
> > > > > > > > *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  				dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> ad-
> > > > > > > > >tx_use_avx2 ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i40e_xmit_pkts_vec_avx2 :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i40e_xmit_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +				dev-
> >recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse
> > > > > =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  #else /* RTE_ARCH_X86 */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> "Using Vector
> > > > > Tx
> > > > > > > > (port %d).",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  				     dev->data-
> >port_id);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > > > i40e_xmit_pkts_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			dev->recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse
> =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec;  #endif /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > RTE_ARCH_X86
> > > > > */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  		} else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> "Simple tx
> > > > > finally be
> > > > > > > > used.");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > > > > i40e_xmit_pkts_simple;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +			dev->recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse
> =
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  		}
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  		dev->tx_pkt_prepare =
> > > > > i40e_simple_prep_pkts;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  	} else {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a8686224e5..b191f23e1f
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ uint32_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_dev_rx_queue_count(void *rx_queue);  int
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_dev_rx_descriptor_status(void *rx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > uint16_t offset);  int
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_dev_tx_descriptor_status(void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *tx_queue, uint16_t offset);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +uint16_t i40e_recycle_tx_mbufs_reuse_vec(void
> > > > *tx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +		struct rte_eth_recycle_rxq_info
> > > > > *recycle_rxq_info);
> > > > > > > > > > void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +i40e_recycle_rx_descriptors_refill_vec(void
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +*rx_queue, uint16_t nb_mbufs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  uint16_t i40e_recv_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct rte_mbuf
> > > > > > > > > > **rx_pkts,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  			    uint16_t nb_pkts);  uint16_t
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > i40e_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build index
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8e53b87a65..3b1a233c84 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/meson.build
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ sources = files(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >          'i40e_tm.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >          'i40e_hash.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >          'i40e_vf_representor.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +	'i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >          'rte_pmd_i40e.c',
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  )
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-25  3:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 145+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20  8:16 [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2022-04-20  8:16 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] net/i40e: remove redundant Dtype initialization Feifei Wang
2022-04-20  8:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] net/i40e: enable direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2022-05-11 22:28   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-04-20  8:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] ethdev: add API for " Feifei Wang
2022-04-20  9:59   ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-29  2:42     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 10:41   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-29  6:28     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-05-10 22:49       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-03 10:19         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-20 10:50   ` Jerin Jacob
2022-05-02  3:09     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-04-21 14:57   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-04-29  6:35     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-04-20  8:16 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] net/i40e: add direct rearm mode internal API Feifei Wang
2022-05-11 22:31   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-04-20  8:16 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] examples/l3fwd: enable direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2022-04-20 10:10   ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-21  2:35     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-04-21  6:40       ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-10 22:01         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-05-11  7:17           ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-11 22:33   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-27 11:28     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-31 17:14       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-03 10:32         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-06 11:27         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-29 21:25           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-05-11 23:00 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Konstantin Ananyev
     [not found] ` <20220516061012.618787-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>
2022-05-24  1:25   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-05-24 12:40     ` Morten Brørup
2022-05-24 20:14     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-05-28 12:22       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-01  1:00         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-03 23:32           ` Konstantin Ananyev
2022-06-04  8:07             ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-29 21:58               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-06-30 15:21                 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-01 19:30                   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-01 20:28                     ` Morten Brørup
2022-06-13  5:55     ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04  7:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04  7:30   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: enable direct rearm with separate API Feifei Wang
2023-01-04  8:21     ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-04  8:51       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04 10:11         ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-24  8:55           ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-06 12:49       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-06 13:26         ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-06 14:53           ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-06 15:02           ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-07  6:12             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-07 10:52               ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-07 20:41               ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-03-22 14:43                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-02 14:33     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-24  9:45       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-27 19:31         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-28  2:16           ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-28  8:09           ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-01  7:34             ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-04  7:30   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] net/i40e: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-02 14:37     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-24  9:50       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-27 19:35         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-28  2:15           ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-07 11:01             ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-14  6:07               ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-19 16:11                 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-23 10:49                   ` Feifei Wang
2023-01-04  7:30   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-01-31  6:13   ` 回复: [PATCH v3 0/3] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2023-02-01  1:10     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-02-01  2:24       ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-22 12:56   ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-22 13:41     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-22 14:04       ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-02  7:38 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  7:38   ` [PATCH v8 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  7:38   ` [PATCH v8 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  7:38   ` [PATCH v8 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  7:38   ` [PATCH v8 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  8:08 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  8:08   ` [PATCH v9 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  8:08   ` [PATCH v9 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  8:08   ` [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-02  8:08   ` [PATCH v9 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-04  9:24 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-04  9:24   ` [PATCH v10 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-04  9:24   ` [PATCH v10 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-04  9:24   ` [PATCH v10 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-04  9:24   ` [PATCH v10 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-22  7:27 ` [PATCH v11 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-22  7:27   ` [PATCH v11 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 14:02     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-24  3:16       ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 23:33     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-24  3:38     ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-22  7:27   ` [PATCH v11 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 23:43     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-24  6:10     ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-31 17:24       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-31 23:49         ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-01 12:22         ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-01 14:22           ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-04  6:59             ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-04  7:49               ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-04  9:24                 ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-04 10:21                   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-05  3:11                     ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-22 14:58                       ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-22 15:46                         ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-22 16:40                           ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-23  5:52                             ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-23 20:40                               ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-25  3:26                               ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2023-08-22  7:27   ` [PATCH v11 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-22  7:27   ` [PATCH v11 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-08-22  7:33   ` [PATCH v11 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-08-22 13:59   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-24  3:11     ` Feifei Wang
2023-08-24  7:36 ` [PATCH v12 " Feifei Wang
2023-08-24  7:36   ` [PATCH v12 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-08-31  9:16     ` Feifei Wang
2023-09-20 13:10     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-08-24  7:36   ` [PATCH v12 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-08-24  7:36   ` [PATCH v12 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-08-24  7:36   ` [PATCH v12 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-09-20 13:11     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-20 13:12   ` [PATCH v12 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-22 15:30     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-25  3:19 ` [PATCH v13 " Feifei Wang
2023-09-25  3:19   ` [PATCH v13 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-09-25  4:40     ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-09-25  3:19   ` [PATCH v13 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-09-26  8:26     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-09-26  8:56       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-26 13:34     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-25  3:19   ` [PATCH v13 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-09-26 13:30     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-25  3:19   ` [PATCH v13 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-09-26 13:30     ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-09-26 16:38       ` Ajit Khaparde
2023-09-27 17:24   ` [PATCH v13 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue into Rx queue Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AS8PR08MB7718610E27B4E86BA3118C04C8FCA@AS8PR08MB7718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Yuying.Zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).