DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication in rcu	qsbr perf
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 05:32:44 +0000
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB5814E84FF71977E7B34C96F498110@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9B5688D2-D668-4EE4-9ECF-150BDEF5A292@arm.com>

<snip>

> >>
> >> Avoid code duplication by combining single and multi threaded tests
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >> app/test/test_lpm_perf.c | 362
> >> ++++++++++-----------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> >> index
> >> 224c92fa3d65..229c835c23f7 100644
> >> --- a/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> >> +++ b/app/test/test_lpm_perf.c
> >> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ enum {
> >> IP_CLASS_C
> >> };
> >>
> >> +enum {
> >> +SINGLE_WRITER = 1,
> >> +MULTI_WRITER_1,
> >> +MULTI_WRITER_2
> >> +};
> > Do we need this? Can we use the number of cores instead?
> >
> 
> There are 3 combinations of writes (adds/deletes):
> 1. Write all the entries - in case of a single writer 2. Write half of the entries -
> in case of multiple writers 3. Write remaining half of the entries - in case of
> multiple writers
> 
> So, I think this is required.
IMO, this is not scalable. Essentially, we need 2 parameters to divide the routes among each writer thread. We need 2 parameters, 1) total number of writers 2) the core ID in the linear space.
Creating a structure with these 2 and passing that to the writer thread would be better and scalable.

> 
> >> +
> >> /* struct route_rule_count defines the total number of rules in
> >> following a/b/c
> >>  * each item in a[]/b[]/c[] is the number of common IP address class
> >> A/B/C, not
> >>  * including the ones for private local network.
> >> @@ -430,11 +436,16 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)  {
> unsigned
> >> int i, j, si, ei; uint64_t begin, total_cycles; -uint8_t core_id =
> >> (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
> >> +uint8_t writer_id = (uint8_t)((uintptr_t)arg);
> >> uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
> >>
> >> -/* 2 writer threads are used */
> >> -if (core_id % 2 == 0) {
> >> +/* Single writer (writer_id = 1) */
> >> +if (writer_id == SINGLE_WRITER) {
> >> +si = 0;
> >> +ei = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
> >> +}
> >> +/* 2 Writers (writer_id = 2/3)*/
> >> +else if (writer_id == MULTI_WRITER_1) {
> >> si = 0;
> >> ei = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES / 2;
> >> } else {
> >> @@ -447,29 +458,35 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg) for (i = 0;
> >> i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
> >> /* Add all the entries */
> >> for (j = si; j < ei; j++) {
> >> -pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> +if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
> >> +pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
> >> large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
> >> next_hop_add) != 0) {
> >> printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n", i, j);
> >> -pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> +if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
> >> +
> >> pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >> -pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> +if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
> >> +pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* Delete all the entries */
> >> for (j = si; j < ei; j++) {
> >> -pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> +if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
> >> +pthread_mutex_lock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm,
> >> large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
> >> large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) { printf("Failed to delete
> >> iteration %d, route# %d\n", i, j); -pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> +if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
> >> +
> >> pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >> -pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> +if (writer_id != SINGLE_WRITER)
> >> +pthread_mutex_unlock(&lpm_mutex);
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -482,16 +499,17 @@ test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer(void *arg)
> >>
> >> /*
> >>  * Functional test:
> >> - * 2 writers, rest are readers
> >> + * 1/2 writers, rest are readers
> >>  */
> >> static int
> >> -test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
> >> +test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(uint8_t use_rcu)
> >> {
> >> struct rte_lpm_config config;
> >> size_t sz;
> >> -unsigned int i;
> >> +unsigned int i, j;
> >> uint16_t core_id;
> >> struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
> >> +int (*reader_f)(void *arg) = NULL;
> >>
> >> if (rte_lcore_count() < 3) {
> >> printf("Not enough cores for lpm_rcu_perf_autotest, expecting at
> >> least 3\n"); @@ -504,273 +522,76 @@
> >> test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(void)
> >> num_cores++;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -printf("\nPerf test: 2 writers, %d readers, RCU integration
> >> enabled\n", -num_cores - 2);
> >> -
> >> -/* Create LPM table */
> >> -config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -
> config.number_tbl8s =
> >> NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -config.flags = 0; -lpm =
> >> rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
> >> -TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
> >> -
> >> -/* Init RCU variable */
> >> -sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
> >> -rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
> >> -RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE); -rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
> >> -
> >> -rcu_cfg.v = rv;
> >> -/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */ -if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm,
> >> &rcu_cfg) != 0) { -printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n"); -goto
> >> error; -}
> >> -
> >> -writer_done = 0;
> >> -__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >> -
> >> -__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> >> -
> >> -/* Launch reader threads */
> >> -for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
> >> -enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -/* Launch writer threads */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
> >> -(void *)(uintptr_t)i,
> >> -enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -/* Wait for writer threads */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> >> -if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0) -goto error;
> >> -
> >> -printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES); -printf("Total LPM
> >> Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES); -printf("Average LPM Add/Del:
> >> %"PRIu64" cycles\n", -__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles,
> >> __ATOMIC_RELAXED) -/ TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> -
> >> -writer_done = 1;
> >> -/* Wait until all readers have exited */ -for (i = 2; i < num_cores;
> >> i++) -rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >> -rte_free(rv);
> >> -lpm = NULL;
> >> -rv = NULL;
> >> -
> >> -/* Test without RCU integration */
> >> -printf("\nPerf test: 2 writers, %d readers, RCU integration
> >> disabled\n", -num_cores - 2);
> >> -
> >> -/* Create LPM table */
> >> -config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -
> config.number_tbl8s =
> >> NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -config.flags = 0; -lpm =
> >> rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
> >> -TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
> >> -
> >> -writer_done = 0;
> >> -__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >> -__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> >> -
> >> -/* Launch reader threads */
> >> -for (i = 2; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_reader, NULL, -enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -/* Launch writer threads */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
> >> -(void *)(uintptr_t)i,
> >> -enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -/* Wait for writer threads */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> >> -if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0) -goto error;
> >> -
> >> -printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES); -printf("Total LPM
> >> Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES); -printf("Average LPM Add/Del:
> >> %"PRIu64" cycles\n", -__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles,
> >> __ATOMIC_RELAXED) -/ TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> -
> >> -writer_done = 1;
> >> -/* Wait until all readers have exited */ -for (i = 2; i < num_cores;
> >> i++) -rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >> -
> >> -return 0;
> >> -
> >> -error:
> >> -writer_done = 1;
> >> -/* Wait until all readers have exited */ -rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
> >> -
> >> -rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >> -rte_free(rv);
> >> -
> >> -return -1;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -/*
> >> - * Functional test:
> >> - * Single writer, rest are readers
> >> - */
> >> -static int
> >> -test_lpm_rcu_perf(void)
> >> -{
> >> -struct rte_lpm_config config;
> >> -uint64_t begin, total_cycles;
> >> -size_t sz;
> >> -unsigned int i, j;
> >> -uint16_t core_id;
> >> -uint32_t next_hop_add = 0xAA;
> >> -struct rte_lpm_rcu_config rcu_cfg = {0};
> >> -
> >> -if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {
> >> -printf("Not enough cores for lpm_rcu_perf_autotest, expecting at
> >> least 2\n"); -return TEST_SKIPPED; -}
> >> -
> >> -num_cores = 0;
> >> -RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(core_id) {
> >> -enabled_core_ids[num_cores] = core_id; -num_cores++; -}
> >> -
> >> -printf("\nPerf test: 1 writer, %d readers, RCU integration
> >> enabled\n", -num_cores);
> >> -
> >> -/* Create LPM table */
> >> -config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -
> config.number_tbl8s =
> >> NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -config.flags = 0; -lpm =
> >> rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
> >> -TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
> >> -
> >> -/* Init RCU variable */
> >> -sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
> >> -rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
> >> -RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE); -rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
> >> -
> >> -rcu_cfg.v = rv;
> >> -/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */ -if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm,
> >> &rcu_cfg) != 0) { -printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n"); -goto
> >> error; -}
> >> -
> >> -writer_done = 0;
> >> -__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> >> -
> >> -/* Launch reader threads */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader, NULL,
> >> -enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -/* Measure add/delete. */
> >> -begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> >> -for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
> >> -/* Add all the entries */
> >> -for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++) -if (rte_lpm_add(lpm,
> >> large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip, -large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
> >> -next_hop_add) != 0) {
> >> -printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route# %d\n", -i, j);
> >> +for (j = 1; j < 3; j++) {
> >> +if (use_rcu)
> >> +printf("\nPerf test: %d writer(s), %d reader(s),"
> >> +       " RCU integration enabled\n", j, num_cores - j); else
> >> +printf("\nPerf test: %d writer(s), %d reader(s),"
> >> +       " RCU integration disabled\n", j, num_cores - j);
> >> +
> >> +/* Create LPM table */
> >> +config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES;
> config.number_tbl8s =
> >> +NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; config.flags = 0; lpm =
> >> +rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
> >> +TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
> >> +
> >> +/* Init RCU variable */
> >> +if (use_rcu) {
> >> +sz = rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize(num_cores);
> >> +rv = (struct rte_rcu_qsbr *)rte_zmalloc("rcu0", sz,
> >> +
> >> RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
> >> +rte_rcu_qsbr_init(rv, num_cores);
> >> +
> >> +rcu_cfg.v = rv;
> >> +/* Assign the RCU variable to LPM */ if (rte_lpm_rcu_qsbr_add(lpm,
> >> +&rcu_cfg) != 0) { printf("RCU variable assignment failed\n");
> >> goto error;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/* Delete all the entries */
> >> -for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++) -if
> >> (rte_lpm_delete(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
> >> -large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) { -printf("Failed to delete
> >> iteration %d, route# %d\n", -i, j); -goto error; -} -} -total_cycles
> >> = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
> >> +reader_f = test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_reader; } else reader_f =
> >> +test_lpm_reader;
> >>
> >> -printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES); -printf("Total LPM
> >> Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES); -printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g
> >> cycles\n", -(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> +writer_done = 0;
> >> +__atomic_store_n(&gwrite_cycles, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >>
> >> -writer_done = 1;
> >> -/* Wait until all readers have exited */ -for (i = 0; i < num_cores;
> >> i++) -if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >> -rte_free(rv);
> >> -lpm = NULL;
> >> -rv = NULL;
> >> -
> >> -/* Test without RCU integration */
> >> -printf("\nPerf test: 1 writer, %d readers, RCU integration
> >> disabled\n", -num_cores);
> >> -
> >> -/* Create LPM table */
> >> -config.max_rules = NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -
> config.number_tbl8s =
> >> NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; -config.flags = 0; -lpm =
> >> rte_lpm_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
> >> -TEST_LPM_ASSERT(lpm != NULL);
> >> +__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> >>
> >> -writer_done = 0;
> >> -__atomic_store_n(&thr_id, 0, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
> >> +/* Launch reader threads */
> >> +for (i = j; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> +rte_eal_remote_launch(reader_f, NULL,
> >> +enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >>
> >> -/* Launch reader threads */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_reader, NULL,
> >> -enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> +/* Launch writer threads */
> >> +for (i = 0; i < j; i++)
> >> +rte_eal_remote_launch(test_lpm_rcu_qsbr_writer,
> >> +(void *)(uintptr_t)(i + j),
> > This can be just 'j'?
> >
> >> +enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >>
> >> -/* Measure add/delete. */
> >> -begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
> >> -for (i = 0; i < RCU_ITERATIONS; i++) {
> >> -/* Add all the entries */
> >> -for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
> >> -if (rte_lpm_add(lpm, large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
> >> -large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth,
> >> -next_hop_add) != 0) {
> >> -printf("Failed to add iteration %d, route#
> >> %d\n",
> >> -i, j);
> >> +/* Wait for writer threads */
> >> +for (i = 0; i < j; i++)
> >> +if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
> >> goto error;
> >> -}
> >>
> >> -/* Delete all the entries */
> >> -for (j = 0; j < NUM_LDEPTH_ROUTE_ENTRIES; j++)
> >> -if (rte_lpm_delete(lpm,
> >> large_ldepth_route_table[j].ip,
> >> -large_ldepth_route_table[j].depth) != 0) {
> >> -printf("Failed to delete iteration %d, route#
> >> %d\n",
> >> -i, j);
> >> -goto error;
> >> -}
> >> +printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> +printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> +printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %"PRIu64" cycles\n",
> >> +__atomic_load_n(&gwrite_cycles,
> >> __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
> >> +/ TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> +
> >> +writer_done = 1;
> >> +/* Wait until all readers have exited */
> >> +for (i = j; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> +rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> +
> >> +rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >> +rte_free(rv);
> >> +lpm = NULL;
> >> +rv = NULL;
> >> }
> >> -total_cycles = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
> >> -
> >> -printf("Total LPM Adds: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> -printf("Total LPM Deletes: %d\n", TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> -printf("Average LPM Add/Del: %g cycles\n",
> >> -(double)total_cycles / TOTAL_WRITES);
> >> -
> >> -writer_done = 1;
> >> -/* Wait until all readers have exited */
> >> -for (i = 0; i < num_cores; i++)
> >> -rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]);
> >> -
> >> -rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> @@ -946,9 +767,8 @@ test_lpm_perf(void)
> >> rte_lpm_delete_all(lpm);
> >> rte_lpm_free(lpm);
> >>
> >> -test_lpm_rcu_perf();
> >> -
> >> -test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer();
> >> +test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(0);
> >> +test_lpm_rcu_perf_multi_writer(1);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-03  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-29 15:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-10-29 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 17:17   ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-02 22:11     ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 10:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation " David Marchand
2020-11-02 15:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-02 16:58   ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 17:21     ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-02 17:33     ` Bruce Richardson
2020-11-02 23:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:30     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:28     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:42       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  1:21     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:56       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-02 23:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  4:21     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  4:33       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:32         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-11-03 14:03           ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 14:51             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03 18:01             ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-03  5:12   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:21       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03  5:22       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-03  5:12     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:23       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-03 22:35         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-11-04 15:46         ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 16:49           ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 18:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] test/lpm: fix cycle calculation in rcu qsbr perf Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:34           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] test/lpm: return error on failure " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] test/lpm: remove error checking " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-04 18:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] test/lpm: avoid code duplication " Dharmik Thakkar
2020-11-04 19:35           ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-11-05 15:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] test/lpm: fix rcu qsbr perf test David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB5814E84FF71977E7B34C96F498110@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git