DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: qi.z.zhang@intel.com, junfeng.guo@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/gve: fix bug in verify driver compatibility
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 14:44:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANzqiF7NydUqXzLbw9jQE2KNk-kWS2TxTguwKKCrAUkTHb4wYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f87b15e-2618-46a8-e43c-ddec57270c6d@amd.com>

Thanks for the clarification and for squashing the bug into the main commit.
I just tested the net-next branch and it seems to log the right
message on the device.

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 7:49 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/2023 5:32 PM, Rushil Gupta wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick response!
> > Just for my own knowledge, what Junfeng described is the process to
> > fix the bug if a bug is present in the main dpdk repo?
> >
>
> Correct.
>
> As main dpdk repo doesn't rewrite git history, any bug there needs to be
> fixed with an incremental commit, and fix commit should have some
> metadata to describe what it is fixing (this is to help LTS maintainers
> and developers tracing down a change).
>
> But sub-trees (like next-net) allowed to rewrite git history, so allowed
>  to squash/rebase commits when it is more practical to do so as this case.
> But changing directly in the git repo has its problems, like tracing,
> justifying source of the change and missing consensus etc. So, even it
> is squashed, the patch should be publicly available in the mail list first.
>
> For developers it is best to send incremental patch as if it will be
> merged as incremental commit, but can request a squash if the commit
> still not pulled by main repo, or maintainer can prefer to squash the
> fix to original commit, to reduce the churn & process overhead.
>
> > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 3:24 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/1/2023 9:26 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >>> On 6/1/2023 5:49 AM, Rushil Gupta wrote:
> >>>> gVNIC requires physical address to be passed in the adminq command.
> >>>> This was initially rightly pointed by ferruh.yigit@.
> >>>> Fixed by passing 'driver_info_mem->iova'.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 3 ++-
> >>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
> >>>> index 2c1e73d07a..aa75abe102 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
> >>>> @@ -276,7 +276,8 @@ gve_verify_driver_compatibility(struct gve_priv *priv)
> >>>>                      (char *)driver_info->os_version_str2);
> >>>>
> >>>>      err = gve_adminq_verify_driver_compatibility(priv,
> >>>> -            sizeof(struct gve_driver_info), (dma_addr_t)driver_info);
> >>>> +            sizeof(struct gve_driver_info),
> >>>> +            (dma_addr_t)driver_info_mem->iova);
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yep, this was my point, let me squashed onto original patch in next-net.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Squashed into relevant commit in next-net, thanks.
> >> Can you please verify latest code in next-net?
>

      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01  3:15 Rushil Gupta
2023-06-01  4:49 ` Rushil Gupta
2023-06-01  6:44   ` Guo, Junfeng
2023-06-01  8:35     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-01  8:58       ` Guo, Junfeng
2023-06-01  8:26   ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-01 10:24     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-01 16:32       ` Rushil Gupta
2023-06-02 14:49         ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-02 21:44           ` Rushil Gupta [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANzqiF7NydUqXzLbw9jQE2KNk-kWS2TxTguwKKCrAUkTHb4wYA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rushilg@google.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=junfeng.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).