* [dpdk-dev] Re: TCP/IP stack - options
@ 2013-09-17 13:09 Gil Hellmann
2013-09-19 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gil Hellmann @ 2013-09-17 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi Sujith,
To add to the respond given by Mr. Jardin, Wind River also has commercial grade protocol stack that could be used with DPDK libraries and application, it is part of Wind Rivers' INP (Intelligent Networking Platform).
Regards,
Gil Hellmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-17 13:09 [dpdk-dev] Re: TCP/IP stack - options Gil Hellmann
@ 2013-09-19 4:33 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-19 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gil Hellmann, dev
Thank you Gil.
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 6:39 PM, "Gil Hellmann" <gil.hellmann@rogers.com> wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>To add to the respond given by Mr. Jardin, Wind River also has commercial
>grade protocol stack that could be used with DPDK libraries and
>application, it is part of Wind Rivers' INP (Intelligent Networking
>Platform).
>
>Regards,
>Gil Hellmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
@ 2013-09-19 4:37 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-19 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wiles, Roger Keith, <dev@dpdk.org>
Thanks Keith ! Your inputs are really helpful.
I'll keep the contacts handy.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 18/09/13 4:45 AM, "Wiles, Roger Keith" <keith.wiles@windriver.com>
wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network
>acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to
>DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system
>meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does).
>
>Wind River's INP product is a complete TCP/IP stack with many more
>features and protocols backed by the largest embedded development company
>in the world. We also have a very close relationship with Intel (as we
>are wholly owned subsidiary of Intel)
>
>We have a patent pending socket layer acceleration design and many more
>features.
>
>Please contact
>steve.konish@windriver.com<mailto:steve.konish@windriver.com> or
>Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com<mailto:Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com> for more
>details.Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the
>CTO office, Wind River
>direct 972.434.4136 mobile 940.213.5533 fax 000.000.0000
>[Powering 30 Years of
>Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
>
>On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
><ssujith@cisco.com<mailto:ssujith@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Vincent,
>
>Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
>I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
>about the other options later.
>
>Regards,
>-Sujith
>
>On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN"
><vincent.jardin@6wind.com<mailto:vincent.jardin@6wind.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
>may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
>robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
>applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
>for the DPDK too:
> - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
> - maybe LwIP TBC
> - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
>and to list them on dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org>.
>
>My 2 cents,
> Vincent
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>
>In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
>little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
>Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
>DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names
>(6Wind,
>rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group
>could
>go a long way in helping me out.
>
>Thanks in advance !
>-Sujith
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-17 4:36 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
@ 2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2013-09-19 4:37 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wiles, Roger Keith @ 2013-09-17 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Hi Sujith,
Wind River also has a fully integrated TCP/IP stack with network acceleration using DPKD with INP/AAE product. A few have ported lwIP to DPDK, but these stacks are not fully integrated into the whole system meaning the Linux host (at least I do not know of anyone that does).
Wind River's INP product is a complete TCP/IP stack with many more features and protocols backed by the largest embedded development company in the world. We also have a very close relationship with Intel (as we are wholly owned subsidiary of Intel)
We have a patent pending socket layer acceleration design and many more features.
Please contact steve.konish@windriver.com<mailto:steve.konish@windriver.com> or Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com<mailto:Paul.Senyshyn@windriver.com> for more details.Keith Wiles, Principal Technologist for Networking member of the CTO office, Wind River
direct 972.434.4136 mobile 940.213.5533 fax 000.000.0000
[Powering 30 Years of Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith) <ssujith@cisco.com<mailto:ssujith@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
about the other options later.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" <vincent.jardin@6wind.com<mailto:vincent.jardin@6wind.com>> wrote:
Hi Sujith,
NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
for the DPDK too:
- Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
- maybe LwIP TBC
- 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
and to list them on dpdk.org<http://dpdk.org>.
My 2 cents,
Vincent
Hi all,
I'm new to DPDK and this group.
In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names
(6Wind,
rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group
could
go a long way in helping me out.
Thanks in advance !
-Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
2013-09-16 20:31 [dpdk-dev] " Vincent JARDIN
@ 2013-09-17 4:36 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-17 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent JARDIN, dev
Hi Vincent,
Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
about the other options later.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" <vincent.jardin@6wind.com> wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP stack for DPDK. Some people
>may have tried to port LwIP too. As far as we know, only 6WIND has a
>robust and fully compliant stack which provides socket APIs to the
>applications on top of the DPDK. I'd be pleased to get a list of options
>for the DPDK too:
> - Rump/NetBSD thanks to Antti
> - maybe LwIP TBC
> - 6WINDGate's fast path TCP/IP stack
>and to list them on dpdk.org.
>
>My 2 cents,
> Vincent
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm new to DPDK and this group.
>>
>> In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
>> little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
>> Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
>> DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names
>>(6Wind,
>> rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group
>>could
>> go a long way in helping me out.
>>
>> Thanks in advance !
>> -Sujith
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack - options
@ 2013-09-05 8:40 Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) @ 2013-09-05 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi all,
I'm new to DPDK and this group.
In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
DPDK libraries and applications? Quick googling gave a few names (6Wind,
rump kernel tcp/ip stack, etc). But some wise words from the group could
go a long way in helping me out.
Thanks in advance !
-Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-19 4:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-17 13:09 [dpdk-dev] Re: TCP/IP stack - options Gil Hellmann
2013-09-19 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-16 20:31 [dpdk-dev] " Vincent JARDIN
2013-09-17 4:36 ` [dpdk-dev] " Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-17 23:15 ` Wiles, Roger Keith
2013-09-19 4:37 ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2013-09-05 8:40 Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).